- Joined
- Jan 28, 2013
- Messages
- 94,823
- Reaction score
- 28,342
- Location
- Williamsburg, Virginia
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
No. Tree ring proxies were never bad. Statistical incompetence and scientific malpractice were (and remain) bad.
He never accounts for differing RESOLUTION levels of proxy data, thus grafting a yearly resolution level temperature data onto proxies, that have resolutions that range from decades to over 100 years, which he doesn't provide a source link to.
He makes clear he has no idea how useless that chart really is.
Ah.
The true expert on paleoclimatology weighs in.
Amazing how much expertise one can get from denier blogs and a career bagging groceries.
As the number of papers contradicting MBH and PAGES continues to mount.
Sure they do.
On your denier blogs.
In the peer-reviewed literature.
Yet... they don’t say what your denier blogs claim.
Yes, they do. You should read more.
If they did, you wouldn’t post denier spam. You’d post Nature editorials saying that these little regional studies have become better than the hundreds of researchers that have worked for a decade on PAGES 2K (which, ill note some of your supposedly ‘skeptical’ authors are a part of).
The data are the data.
Three local/regional studies.
Probably already included in PAGES.
But your denier blogs didn’t tell you that.
If they were included then that would mark PAGES' turn away from MBH.
No.
But you wouldn’t understand.
If they were included then that would mark PAGES' turn away from MBH.
These are published papers that threegoofs refuses to read, because he thinks they are tainted by being mentioned in a Skeptic blog, well here it is straight from their science publishers only. You are safe now....., no blogs at all.....
Springer Link
Multi-scale temperature variations and their regional differences in China during the Medieval Climate Anomaly
===
Quaternary Science Reviews
A Late Holocene Subfossil Atlantic White Cedar Tree-Ring Chronology from the northeaster United States
===
Springer Link
Ensemble standardization constraints on the influence of the tree growth trends in dendroclimatology
===
Climate Dynamics
Eastern Mediterranean summer temperatures since*730 CE from*Mt. Smolikas tree‑ring densities
===
Science Direct
Assessing non-linearity in European temperature-sensitive tree-ring data
===
Nature
Ancient air challenges prominent explanation for a shift in glacial cycles
===
What will be your excuse to avoiding all these published papers?
They are directly from parent publishers.
Still frightened?
Nope.
What kind of discussion has this sparked to discredit PAGES at, say, the AGU meetings?