- Joined
- Apr 17, 2018
- Messages
- 53,605
- Reaction score
- 58,599
- Location
- Guiando la manada de cabras
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
So your post says Trump didn't actually take any steps but cloaks their conspiracy theory in COVID measures.
Most of your article takes issue with immigration being reduced because.....Trump enforces immigration law.
You can't be a public charge. You have to be a real refugee, not just claim status and so on.
The only change is Trump enforcing the law vs ignoring it.
MAGAs aren't conservatives.Seems pretty incompatible with your views on immigration and American greatness. Would you support removing the poem?
“Not like the brazen giant of Greek fame,
With conquering limbs astride from land to land;
Here at our sea-washed, sunset gates shall stand
A mighty woman with a torch, whose flame
Is the imprisoned lightning, and her name
Mother of Exiles. From her beacon-hand
Glows world-wide welcome; her mild eyes command
The air-bridged harbor that twin cities frame.
"Keep, ancient lands, your storied pomp!" cries she
With silent lips. "Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me,
I lift my lamp beside the golden door!"
New data shows why the U.S. needs more immigrants
As the fight over immigration reached peak chaos in the U.S. Senate earlier this month, the Congressional Budget Office held a press conference nearby. The director’s briefing about the latest economic forecast seemed disconnected from the political drama playing out a few blocks away. But its...publicintegrity.org
So your post says Trump didn't actually take any steps but cloaks their conspiracy theory in COVID measures.
Most of your article takes issue with immigration being reduced because.....Trump enforces immigration law.
You can't be a public charge. You have to be a real refugee, not just claim status and so on.
The only change is Trump enforcing the law vs ignoring it.
They tend to generally do better for America than the right. Just ask Donald Trump.If only the left cared as much for American citizens as they do for illegal immigrants and criminals. What am I saying, that'll never happen
I don't think that you understand that America is currently closed to all immigrants, legal or illegal. Yes, we technically still have a legal process, but the 'door ain't open'. We do need comprehensive immigration reform: we need agreement as to how immigration should work and then manage to that.Why do you insist on thinking illegal immigration is the same as legal immigration? We absolutely do welcome immigrants who come to our country legally. This is just another example of the evil of the left. Do you not understand that the most support given to Trump's immigrant policies is from the Hispanic community? You know, the most recent LEGAL immigrants?
Democrats will never win elections again if they can't recognize reality. Here is an example of just how disconnected Democrats are from the common sense core of American citizens.
Trump doesn't like any immigration. He reduced legal immigration during first term (but actually increase illegal immigration)So your post says Trump didn't actually take any steps but cloaks their conspiracy theory in COVID measures.
Most of your article takes issue with immigration being reduced because.....Trump enforces immigration law.
You can't be a public charge. You have to be a real refugee, not just claim status and so on.
The only change is Trump enforcing the law vs ignoring it.
Again, this administration wants less of those too. Perhaps you can do a better job at reading the article to find the specific policies this administration is employing to do exactly that.Legal immigrants...emphasis on legal.
Again, this administration wants less of those too. Perhaps you can do a better job at reading the article to find the specific policies this administration is employing to do exactly that.
I don't think that you understand that America is currently closed to all immigrants, legal or illegal. Yes, we technically still have a legal process, but the 'door ain't open'. We do need comprehensive immigration reform: we need agreement as to how immigration should work and then manage to that.
Immigration to the U.S. Dropped an Insane 92%
The United States has welcomed more than 85 million legal immigrants to the United States since its founding. But at no time since it has maintained records has the country witnessed as fast a decline in legal immigration as it has seen in the second half of fiscal year 2020 (which finished...nationalinterest.org
Trump doesn't like any immigration. He reduced legal immigration during first term (but actually increase illegal immigration)
President Trump Reduced Legal Immigration. He Did Not Reduce Illegal Immigration
The population of illegal immigrants remained about the same as when he took office.www.cato.org Trump restricted legal immigration in his first term. Will it happen again?
Trump’s changes to legal immigration didn't grab many headlines, but they affected people and U.S. businesses, and some warn a second term could have more ripple effects.www.nbcnews.com A Look Back At Trump's Immigration Policies And Their Impact On Immigrants
In the first term of President Donald Trump's leadership, his main focus was to limit immigration. He issued over 400 executive actions, which changed the immigration system in the United States. Trump's administration successfully reduced the number of legal immigrants...www.theocimmigrationattorney.com
Donald Trump’s Team Takes First Steps To Cut Legal Immigration
Donald Trump reduced legal immigration in his first term, and his team has taken the first steps to do so again.www.forbes.com
I remember having this discussion on an internet chat site (not this one) years ago with "conservatives" (this was during the Bush Jr era, before their more virulent evolution into Tea Party or MAGA)- and even back then they were being very clear that they thought the poem was an obsolete idea, for back when only white people were coming to this country- but now it's time to take it down (presumably because the skin tone of the new immigrants really doesn't measure up as much).
Seems pretty incompatible with your views on immigration and American greatness. Would you support removing the poem?
“Not like the brazen giant of Greek fame,
With conquering limbs astride from land to land;
Here at our sea-washed, sunset gates shall stand
A mighty woman with a torch, whose flame
Is the imprisoned lightning, and her name
Mother of Exiles. From her beacon-hand
Glows world-wide welcome; her mild eyes command
The air-bridged harbor that twin cities frame.
"Keep, ancient lands, your storied pomp!" cries she
With silent lips. "Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me,
I lift my lamp beside the golden door!"
We can keep the statue as is, as a historical reminder of the time when we welcomed immigrants during America's still-formative years and needed people to help build our infastructure. Times have changed. We do not need nearly as many, and especially not the "wretched refuse".
We should take the entire statue down at this point.
The statue of liberty was erected in 1886, the population of the United States was 63,000,000 in 1890. The density of population in the continental US was FIVE TIMES less than today. l
My home State of California in 1890 had a population of 1.2 million. Today it has a population of 40 million. In other words, California was Thirty-three (33) less dense than today.
I don't buy into the bull excrement of "its still never enough" fanaticism, be in packing people into borders and then demanding provision of more social services, more infrastructure, more industrialization, more freeways, more traffic congestion AND more air pollution while having fewer farms, fewer nature areas, less vacant lands, and less open space.
The Statue of Liberty and the plaque that was added much later reflected an era long past. The frontier "closed" in 1890, and between then and WW1 the bulk of mass immigration flooded America, along with an equally prolific child birthing of heritage Americans. By 1920 there was 106,000 Americans.
And, I would remind those less familiar with history, this era of mass immigration was also one of plunging wages, harsher working conditions, extreme labor violence, and over 600,000 strikes - in part because so many newcomers flooded labor markets. Moreover, it was also the era of the organized crime that would flourish in immigrant communities and corrupt and terrorize much of urban America for the next 70 to 80 years.
So NO, its not never enough, it's ENOUGH IS ENOUGH. Now it is 341 million people and if that many people can't build a prosperous nation then its not a serious nation. And if more people made a nation rich, then India should have been light years ahead of America because if it (and Africa) rich in people - or something is wrong with "its never enough".
Or sanitized either.Yes.
Wait, I changed my mind. No, we should keep it because it is the country's history. Good or bad, I don't think anything should be 'removed' if they are part of history.
Monuments are for elements we choose to celebrate. You would prevent others from exercising that choice.Or sanitized either.
The military folks are the ones swarming our cities, and we didn’t invite them.I mean...who would be stupid enough to believe that the statue of liberty poem means "throw out all laws and allow 20-40 million illegal immigrants to swarm your cities..."
Monuments are for elements we choose to celebrate. You would prevent others from exercising that choice.
Museums and history books can house unsanitary relics.
You mean LE who are employed to keep the peace? I hope you're enjoying seeing LE doing their jobs tonight in the greater Los Angeles area.The military folks are the ones swarming our cities, and we didn’t invite them.
Then down the memory hole they should go.Monuments are for elements we choose to celebrate. You would prevent others from exercising that choice.
Museums and history books can house unsanitary relics.
Yet your sentiments, and even your very wording, have been voiced since the very founding of this country- even before- when it was just a bunch of British colonies.I don't buy into the bull excrement of "its still never enough population" fanaticism, it amounting to packing people into confined borders and then demanding provision of more social services, more infrastructure, more industrialization, more freeways, more traffic congestion, more housing AND more air pollution while having fewer farms, fewer nature areas, less vacant lands, desirable and safe places to live.
MAGAs aren't conservatives.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?