MaggieD
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Jul 9, 2010
- Messages
- 43,244
- Reaction score
- 44,664
- Location
- Chicago Area
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Moderate
By Michael Kitchen
LOS ANGELES (MarketWatch) -- The White House has approved a deal that will exempt members of Congress and their staff from some of the provisions of the Affordable Care Act, Politico reported late Thursday. Under the law, popularly referred to as Obamacare, lawmakers and their aides were required to source health insurance "created" by the law or offered through one of its exchanges, and without the subsidies they currently enjoy, the members of Congress would have faced thousands of dollars in additional premium payments each year, the report said. However, the Office of Personnel Management now plans to rule that the government can continue to make a contribution to the health-care premiums of the lawmakers and their staff, it said, citing unnamed congressional sources and a White House official.
Ever notice how these stories are always reported on Friday?
Congress to get Obamacare exemption: report - MarketWatch
Ever notice how these stories are always reported on Friday?
Congress to get Obamacare exemption: report - MarketWatch
Ever notice how these stories are always reported on Friday?
Congress to get Obamacare exemption: report - MarketWatch
Remember that "saving money" by lowering health care costs was the stated goal of the PPACA law. Why would Obama not want to save the taxpayers all of that money?
The more we learn of "what's in the bill" the less popular it becomes. Naturally, King Barrack, is able to "fine tune" the implementation of the PPACA law all by using his own magical executive powers. The unions (public and private) are now very upset as they have supposedly lost their ability to offer "better" medical insurance plans to their members. That equal treatment under the law is most inconvenient for the friends of Barrack, so it must be waived, out of "fairness", of course.
The one thing that has me wondering about the whole shootin' match is why!!! is it taking until October 1st to see the rates? You can bet those rates are already in place and have been for some time.
Am I reading this wrong? It sounds like this isn't an exemption, rather just a ruling that federal health benefits do, in fact, apply to purchasing insurance on the new exchange.
So, to clarify:
Congress and their aids are not "exempt" from Obamacare. They never have been. What came up recently was that while Congress and their aids were required by Obamacare to participate in the newly-created exchanges, it wasn't clear that the current health care subsidies that all federal employees get would be applicable to the exchange. There wasn't a clear ruling that they were allowed to apply that subsidy to the new exchanges.
This report clarifies that yes, they can do that. They get the same benefits as before, and are still required to purchase a plan on the new exchanges.
Somebody explain to me the problem.
Members of Congress and their staffs would be the only employees of a large employer in the exchanges...
[...]
The concern, as a Roll Call story explained, was that the government wouldn’t be able to make contributions toward the federal employees’ premiums, at least at the beginning of 2014. That would mean employees would pick up the whole tab for their insurance policies. Right now, the government pays 72 percent of premiums on average.
Congress and an Exemption from ‘Obamacare’? | FactCheck.org
Here’s how it happened: Back during the Affordable Care Act negotiations, Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) proposed an amendment forcing all members of Congress and all of their staffs to enter the exchanges. The purpose of the amendment was to embarrass the Democrats. But in a bit of jujitsu of which they were inordinately proud, Democrats instead embraced the amendment and added it to the law.
No, Congress isn’t trying to exempt itself from Obamacare
Ever notice how these stories are always reported on Friday?
Congress to get Obamacare exemption: report - MarketWatch
What’s not well understood is the origin of this ruling. Uniquely, lawmakers and their aides had to get insurance “created” by the Affordable Care Act or “offered through an exchange.” This provision — stuck into the Affordable Care Act by Sen. Chuck Grassley, an Iowa Republican, basically as an intended poison pill — only applied to Congress and to no one else.
That is still the case. The current plans go away. House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi issued a statement Thursday night saying lawmakers and their staffs must enroll in an exchange by Oct. 1.
The ruling by the OPM means that the government will contribute to those plans — just as it does now, and just as most private-sector employees have their health insurance paid for, in part or in whole, by their employers.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?