aquapub
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Apr 16, 2005
- Messages
- 7,317
- Reaction score
- 344
- Location
- America (A.K.A., a red state)
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
Since liberals on this site (and elsewhere) cannot seem to (or are unwilling to) grasp why us conservatives (notice that WE don’t mind being called by what WE are) constantly categorize liberals together as, “the left,” or even worse, as, “liberals,” –gasp!- I will spell it out.
An example of the reasoning:
-It was a liberal who knowingly watched and made excuses to do nothing about China falling slowly into the hands of Communist butchers, despite scores of generals and advisors telling him it was a mistake.
-It was a liberal who then refused to let our military respond when Communist China poured hundreds of thousands of troops across the Korean border, slaughtering thousands of our soldiers and prolonging a nearly concluded Korean war for years to come.
-It is liberals who have opposed every step of Israel’s (a free country) existence, while repeatedly siding with the fanatical Muslim terrorist nations who rabidly slaughter innocent people continuously.
-It is liberals who called our troops baby-killers as they returned home from Vietnam, visited and aided the Viet Cong, and staged violent protests against fighting Communism in Vietnam or anywhere.
-It is liberals who incessantly screamed that Reagan was going to get us all killed when he stood up to the Soviet Union (another enemy), and eventually defeated them. (And don’t let liberals try to feed you that joke of an argument that it was Carter’s “kiss the enemy’s ass” approach that somehow brought down the Russians, as opposed to the ten years of tough Republican leadership immediately preceding Russia’s collapse.)
-It is liberals who have established this ludicrous rite of passage requiring a constant rotation of Hollywood stars and college professors making pilgrimages to worship at the feet of holy dictator, Fidel Castro, and to report back to the heathens here who actually prefer liberty what a “paradise” communist Cuba is.
It is liberals who have screamed about every single common sense step the president has taken to strengthen national security from Guantanamo Bay to the Patriot Act.
-It was a liberal Deputy Attorney General under Clinton who made the rule that the FBI and CIA were not allowed to share terrorism information.
-It was a liberal president who gave us eight years of unanswered Al Queda attacks, appeasements for North Korea, and not a stitch of progress against Saddam.
-It is liberals who compare people to Hitler when they try to deport (or do ANYTHING about) illegal immigrants.
-It is the only liberal in Bush’s cabinet (Norman Mineta) who has stood in the way of each and every airport policy that actually WOULD make us safer.
So when us conservatives hear liberals saying with a straight face that Saddam (who openly sponsored Palestinian suicide bombers, tried to have Bush senior assassinated, committed genocide with WMD, and was caught sheltering Abbu Abbas) was not connected to terrorism or a threat, we think, “Of course, they are siding with our enemies; lying for them; working against America, that’s what they do.”
But liberals don’t want people connecting all these dots and seeing liberal “accomplishments” as the huge chain of treasonous, destructive acts that they are. (I wouldn’t want to be associated with people who had sided with every single enemy this country has had in the last fifty years either.) They want the annoying fly-over state people who actually have an iota or more of patriotism and unfortunately (for liberals) sway the vote heavily to believe that this week’s excuse for doing nothing about a threat or for siding with a genocidal terror-sponsor is an isolated event; its just this once, because THIS situation calls for “restraint.”
So they peddle this phony outrage about Republicans simplifying their views by calling them all, “liberals” or, “the left.”
We aren’t simplifying anything. And we don’t do it because we are trying to demonize liberals. We call liberals, “liberals” because, for one, that’s what they are, and two there is an enormous history of this left-wing treachery that people need to be aware of before buying this week’s steaming load about why our enemies are actually the good guys and why, “just this once,” we should just bend over and take it.
Conservatives are proud of what they stand for. Liberals are the only ones who constantly run from what they are.
-If I am for free gun rights, I am pro-gun because, I am supporting a right that will put more guns on the streets. I am not pro-“the choice to have a gun.” That is just a copout PRO-ABORTIONISTS use to avoid being affiliated with the horrific partial-birth abortions they protect. (If it is so horrid that even its defenders don’t want to be associated with it, shouldn’t that tell you something about supporting it?)
-Another typical liberal “re-packaging” of something horrible to make it sound better is when liberal pseudo-historians call the left’s calculated refusal to interfere with bloodthirsty psycho-communists taking over China, “letting China find its own path.” The correct wording would be more like “voluntarily losing China to communism” or “sending lambs to the slaughter.”
Conservatives aren’t calling liberals, “liberals” to insinuate that they are united in some organized conspiracy either. (ACTUAL paranoia is almost exclusively a product of the left.)
Again, it is to sort out who stands for what, and to demonstrate to people who they are siding with when they get sucked into bogus left-wing hype.
If you are ever in the dark about which party stands where on an issue, ask yourself which side is working against freedom, our troops, and/or America’s economy/interests, and you will find the left.
They have sided with every tyrant from Stalin to Castro (and almost all enemies of freedom – not coincidentally- have left-wing parties: Stalin, Lenin, Mao, Castro-communist, Nazi stands for National Socialist, even Napoleon conducted his reign of terror under a liberal label.) and the greater the genocide, the more liberals seem to defend them.
In fact, the only freedom liberals are for is the freedom to violate someone else’s rights, as with abortion, racist hiring preferences, etc. Well, Okay. They do stand up for some issues of actual freedom, but only as it applies to Muslim terrorists and child-rapists. They are the antithesis of genuine freedom.
An example of the reasoning:
-It was a liberal who knowingly watched and made excuses to do nothing about China falling slowly into the hands of Communist butchers, despite scores of generals and advisors telling him it was a mistake.
-It was a liberal who then refused to let our military respond when Communist China poured hundreds of thousands of troops across the Korean border, slaughtering thousands of our soldiers and prolonging a nearly concluded Korean war for years to come.
-It is liberals who have opposed every step of Israel’s (a free country) existence, while repeatedly siding with the fanatical Muslim terrorist nations who rabidly slaughter innocent people continuously.
-It is liberals who called our troops baby-killers as they returned home from Vietnam, visited and aided the Viet Cong, and staged violent protests against fighting Communism in Vietnam or anywhere.
-It is liberals who incessantly screamed that Reagan was going to get us all killed when he stood up to the Soviet Union (another enemy), and eventually defeated them. (And don’t let liberals try to feed you that joke of an argument that it was Carter’s “kiss the enemy’s ass” approach that somehow brought down the Russians, as opposed to the ten years of tough Republican leadership immediately preceding Russia’s collapse.)
-It is liberals who have established this ludicrous rite of passage requiring a constant rotation of Hollywood stars and college professors making pilgrimages to worship at the feet of holy dictator, Fidel Castro, and to report back to the heathens here who actually prefer liberty what a “paradise” communist Cuba is.
It is liberals who have screamed about every single common sense step the president has taken to strengthen national security from Guantanamo Bay to the Patriot Act.
-It was a liberal Deputy Attorney General under Clinton who made the rule that the FBI and CIA were not allowed to share terrorism information.
-It was a liberal president who gave us eight years of unanswered Al Queda attacks, appeasements for North Korea, and not a stitch of progress against Saddam.
-It is liberals who compare people to Hitler when they try to deport (or do ANYTHING about) illegal immigrants.
-It is the only liberal in Bush’s cabinet (Norman Mineta) who has stood in the way of each and every airport policy that actually WOULD make us safer.
So when us conservatives hear liberals saying with a straight face that Saddam (who openly sponsored Palestinian suicide bombers, tried to have Bush senior assassinated, committed genocide with WMD, and was caught sheltering Abbu Abbas) was not connected to terrorism or a threat, we think, “Of course, they are siding with our enemies; lying for them; working against America, that’s what they do.”
But liberals don’t want people connecting all these dots and seeing liberal “accomplishments” as the huge chain of treasonous, destructive acts that they are. (I wouldn’t want to be associated with people who had sided with every single enemy this country has had in the last fifty years either.) They want the annoying fly-over state people who actually have an iota or more of patriotism and unfortunately (for liberals) sway the vote heavily to believe that this week’s excuse for doing nothing about a threat or for siding with a genocidal terror-sponsor is an isolated event; its just this once, because THIS situation calls for “restraint.”
So they peddle this phony outrage about Republicans simplifying their views by calling them all, “liberals” or, “the left.”
We aren’t simplifying anything. And we don’t do it because we are trying to demonize liberals. We call liberals, “liberals” because, for one, that’s what they are, and two there is an enormous history of this left-wing treachery that people need to be aware of before buying this week’s steaming load about why our enemies are actually the good guys and why, “just this once,” we should just bend over and take it.
Conservatives are proud of what they stand for. Liberals are the only ones who constantly run from what they are.
-If I am for free gun rights, I am pro-gun because, I am supporting a right that will put more guns on the streets. I am not pro-“the choice to have a gun.” That is just a copout PRO-ABORTIONISTS use to avoid being affiliated with the horrific partial-birth abortions they protect. (If it is so horrid that even its defenders don’t want to be associated with it, shouldn’t that tell you something about supporting it?)
-Another typical liberal “re-packaging” of something horrible to make it sound better is when liberal pseudo-historians call the left’s calculated refusal to interfere with bloodthirsty psycho-communists taking over China, “letting China find its own path.” The correct wording would be more like “voluntarily losing China to communism” or “sending lambs to the slaughter.”
Conservatives aren’t calling liberals, “liberals” to insinuate that they are united in some organized conspiracy either. (ACTUAL paranoia is almost exclusively a product of the left.)
Again, it is to sort out who stands for what, and to demonstrate to people who they are siding with when they get sucked into bogus left-wing hype.
If you are ever in the dark about which party stands where on an issue, ask yourself which side is working against freedom, our troops, and/or America’s economy/interests, and you will find the left.
They have sided with every tyrant from Stalin to Castro (and almost all enemies of freedom – not coincidentally- have left-wing parties: Stalin, Lenin, Mao, Castro-communist, Nazi stands for National Socialist, even Napoleon conducted his reign of terror under a liberal label.) and the greater the genocide, the more liberals seem to defend them.
In fact, the only freedom liberals are for is the freedom to violate someone else’s rights, as with abortion, racist hiring preferences, etc. Well, Okay. They do stand up for some issues of actual freedom, but only as it applies to Muslim terrorists and child-rapists. They are the antithesis of genuine freedom.