my gun rights change from state-to-state to. So why is it okay to discriminate against gun owners?
You have to be kidding. I give up
Lmao, the right to bear arms shall not be infringed. That's the only right I see. Which state doesn't let you own guns?
I can carry a concealed handgun in my state and all states that have reciprocity.
I can't in illinois or California.
That is different because that law is actively enforced. Where I could adopt a child in Texas but I'm not guaranteed the right to.
Not sure it would, Neo-Nazis are not a protected class. Fundamentally, yes it should force them to because it's the same thing. But this is a very carefully scripted, and maintained one-way road.
Perhaps the reason why you don't hear as much about Muslim florists and Muslim bakers being forced to sell flowers to same sex couples and bake them cakes is the fact that Muslims are only about 1% of the total population of the United States. However, their business would be compelled to sell to them by the same anti-discrimination laws that apply to every one else. .
...or for not being gay, or for not knowing if you are gay, or for not being able to spell "gay," or for using the word "gay" to mean "happy," because it is an "emploment at will" state.In Texas it is legal to fire you for being gay.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGBT_employment_discrimination_in_the_United_States#State_law
...or for not being gay, or for not knowing if you are gay, or for not being able to spell "gay," or for using the word "gay" to mean "happy," because it is an "emploment at will" state.
No, that's prohibited by federal law.Can they fire you for being black?
I can carry a concealed handgun in my state and all states that have reciprocity. I can't in illinois or California.
No, that's prohibited by federal law.
But they do. Cab drivers refuse whoever they want. All the time.
Well, not for lack of trying. A bill has been introduced in just about every congressional session since the early Clinton years.It should be the same for gays
I doubt he has the mental acuity.
You're going to have to cite specifically the law and the state or municipality that forbade people from seeing their Partners in the hospital.
I imagine such law would have been relentlessly attacked I would have gone after it. And if it does exist I'd like to know
Okay this is a little strange. You associate laws regarding homosexuals as anti-discrimination. That maybe their purpose. But are they necessary. I don't recall ever being discriminated in housing due to my sexual orientation. I've never even been asked that on an application. Not at work and I've worked in very masculine dominated fields.
The existence of laws does not directly equate to lack of discrimination States may not have a problem with this.
You show me more than a statistical zero of homosexuals being discriminated against in the United States.
If "religious beliefs" require practicing discrimination it is no longer protected by the Constitution. Therefore a change of vocation is their only answer. This is settled law from the 1960's.
Yeah, that last sentence is pretty mind blowing. Lol, I can't get fired for having a wife. He can be fired for being married to a guy. He doesn't find it discriminatory at all. Talk about obviously fake poster.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...?hpid=hp_hp-morning-mix_mm-ban:homepage/story
I agree with the Judges decision, and I am sure some will not.
Not sure on this, but most if not all countries that have SS would not tolerate this discrimination.
Not unless they make nazis a protected class. The question we should be debating is if homosexuals should be a protected class of people.
Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk
People choose to be neo-Nazis; people don't choose to be gay.
For some reason, I'm having a hard time believing you're gay if you're unable to imagine gays being discriminated against in the U.S.
Please don't adopt a child. Please
I find myself torn on this one...here's why I think businesses should *not* be allowed to discriminate. While the highest profile cases seem to be around "frivolous" services, such as wedding cakes and videographers, if the precedent is set that they can refuse service based on sexual orientation, or any other demographic driven traits (race, age, etc), then more essential services can refuse...
The gay couple can choose another videographer.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?