- Joined
- Mar 29, 2013
- Messages
- 42,372
- Reaction score
- 9,143
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
I can’t disagree with that and I don’t think that is what the evolutionists are saying, but rather than using the plural every single time, they use the term LUCA to indicate the life form that is the foundation of all the rest without claiming how many individuals there were, since obviously they can’t know at this point. I pretty sure they’re not saying that there was just one.
What your article says is not conclusive, Watsup.
Last Universal Common Ancestor had a complex cellular structure | News Bureau | University of Illinois“This is the only organelle to our knowledge now that is common to eukaryotes, that is common to bacteria and that is most likely common to archaea,” Seufferheld said. “It is the only one that is universal.”
The study lends support to a hypothesis that LUCA may have been more complex even than the simplest organisms alive today, said James Whitfield, a professor of entomology at Illinois and a co-author on the study.
you will find that he does in fact show that the accusations of James Tour made against macroevolution are false in that he claimed that polyphosphate storage organelle is NOT present in all three domains of life — bacteria, archaea and the eukaryotes, which include animals, plants and fungi.
This is from an evolutionary scientist that actually does research, not someone who does critiques as a hobby like the dilettante Tour as regards evolution.
And, you're wrong again about James Tour. BECAUSE..........you don't read.
An Open Letter to My Colleagues | Articles | Inference: International Review of ScienceCellular and organelle bilayers, which were once thought of as simple vesicles, are anything but.
They are highly functional gatekeepers. By virtue of their glycans, lipid bilayers become enormous banks of stored, readable, and re-writable information. The sonication of a few random lipids, polysaccharides, and proteins in a lab will not yield cellular lipid bilayer membranes.
Mes frères, mes semblables, with these complexities in mind, how can we build the microsystem of a simple cell? Would we be able to build even the lipid bilayers? These diminutive cellular microsystems—which are, in turn, composed of thousands of nanosystems—are beyond our comprehension.
Last edited: