• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Cocaine Cover-Up? Secret Service Shrugs Off White House White Powder Investigation Over Alleged Lack Of DNA

Michael Cole said:
Considering he was nowhere near the WH, he's moving at light speed.
Click to expand...
he was there Fri . the stuff was found Sun.
You have been listening to lying what's her face Press Sec who said the Bidens werent' there Fri
 
anatta said:
when is the last time dope was found in the WH 2x? it's Martians
Click to expand...
322 times during the Trump administration, but they covered it up, of course.
 
VySky said:
As suspected.

Nothing to see here, move along

Our government is so fricking nasty



------------------
Click to expand...

Donald Jr had it on him when he snuck in on a guided tour and it fell out out of his pocket.
That guy loves his blow.
 
Questerr said:
White House tour groups and visitors include a lot of people who have never had government jobs. How do you get their drug records?

You know there are tons of drug users, especially for cocaine, who never get any kind of criminal record that could be used as an investigation lead, right?
Click to expand...

Heck if all the people who used coke had criminal records; there'd be no brokers on Wall Street o_O

To be clear this is just my speculation; but as much sniffing as the former guy does he might be using it as well as his Jr

They have no idea how long it has been there either
 
anatta said:
what long history? Willie Nelson under Carter?
and he had it on him . .now it's 2x in like a year?
Click to expand...
grew-poppies-and.jpg


Legal at the time, but funny nonetheless.
 
Michael Cole said:
No fingerprints or recoverable DNA indicates this was a plant. Maybe Boebert put it there.
Click to expand...

No *usable* fingerprints. If the fingerprints aren’t in any existing database, they are useless unless a suspect can be identified through some other means.
 
anatta said:
no it doesnt mean it was planted evidence at all.
Click to expand...
Logically it does. People don't wipe evidence before accidentally dropping it. Since it was wiped, it's an obvious plant.

Screaming "Hunter Biden" endlessly 24 hours a day for years isn't a logical argument. For anything.
 
Questerr said:
White House tour groups and visitors include a lot of people who have never had government jobs. How do you get their drug records?
Click to expand...
You don't get their drug records. You are simply trying to take the universe of possibilities down to a manageable likely number of possibilities using deductive reasoning. I would guess you would eliminate at least half if not more than half the possibilities to a degree of credible reliability just in that effort. That is where you will start the actual investigative work.

Does everybody that comes to the WH use those cubbies? I thought it was a somewhat smaller group than EVERYBODY. Assuming there is video security footage of the area of the cubbies where it was found you would curtail your video reviews to that area.

You have the visitor logs right. If anybody has a criminal drug record, that is accessible without stepping on anyone's rights.
Questerr said:
You know there are tons of drug users, especially for cocaine, who never get any kind of criminal record that could be used as an investigation lead, right?
Click to expand...
Yup.
 
Questerr said:
No *usable* fingerprints. If the fingerprints aren’t in any existing database, they are useless unless a suspect can be identified through some other means.
Click to expand...
Sure. It could mean a partial or that it was smeared. Could mean many things. I'm just exercising my extreme right brain. I have a much better imagination than they do.
 

Questerr said:
Not just Willie Nelson, do more research.
Click to expand...
lol..Snoop claims he smoked a blunt.which has never been confirmed
but as far as I know these 2 "coincidences" are the only time it was found

1 time sure.. 2x? a pattern
 
Guess they'll have to have drug sniffing dogs at the WH now as well as metal detectors...
 
brothern said:
Have you ever met a tourist?
Click to expand...
What does that have to do with anything, "Gee going to the WH...gotta have a blast with me" Sounds pretty stupid to me.
 
jnug said:
You don't get their drug records. You are simply trying to take the universe of possibilities down to a manageable likely number of possibilities using deductive reasoning. I would guess you would eliminate at least half if not more than half the possibilities to a degree of credible reliability just in that effort. That is where you will start the actual investigative work.

Does everybody that comes to the WH use those cubbies? I thought it was a somewhat smaller group than EVERYBODY. Assuming there is video security footage of the area of the cubbies where it was found you would curtail your video reviews to that area.

You have the visitor logs right. If anybody has a criminal drug record, that is accessible without stepping one anyone's rights.

Yup.
Click to expand...

Even if you limit it to just the visitors who use those cubbies, unless you have some other kind of corroborating record that could make them a suspect, you have nothing to go on and have hit a dead end. What are you going to do, arrest everyone who used those cubbies that day and interrogate them?
 
anatta said:
lol..Snoop claims he smoked a blunt.which has never been confirmed
but as far as I know these 2 "coincidences" are the only time it was found

1 time sure.. 2x? a pattern
Click to expand...

That’s not accurate either. It’s not just celebrities.

And people wonder why I hypothesize that all Conservative positions come down to ignorance.
 
Michael Cole said:
Logically it does. People don't wipe evidence before accidentally dropping it. Since it was wiped, it's an obvious plant.

Screaming "Hunter Biden" endlessly 24 hours a day for years isn't a logical argument. For anything.
Click to expand...
it didnt say it was wiped. there was DNA. It's just another Biden mystery!
 
From a pragmatist point of view, how many millions of dollars should we spend to find out which visitor, staff-member, maintenance/custodial engineer, etc., dropped, (or planted) a hundred-dollar baggie of booger-sugar?

Enquiring minds want to know.
 
Questerr said:
That’s not accurate either. It’s not just celebrities.

And people wonder why I hypothesize that all Conservative positions come down to ignorance.
Click to expand...
3 times you have made the claim without bothering to back it up. So im not bothering to listen to you further
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom