• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

(CNN) Trump lays into Musk, suggesting he has ‘Trump derangement syndrome’

Nope. ICE is raiding Martha's Vineyard and the Hamptons all the same which is why the NYT is so upset. Republicans are taking away all the Democrats cheap labor... again.
lol

Trump flat out told a group of donors that they could continue to employ the people who came here illegally.

Sure sounds like the people in the places you're talking about were NOT among that group of donors Trump told that to.

Maybe if the people in the places you are talking about didn't want to get raided,​
they should have been among that group of donors Trump talked to?​

🤷
 
You changed your mind?

Trump is doing things which are different than past presidents?

Again, no. For the action to be considered different, the action would be in response to the same situation. For illegal aliens that are not committing other crimes and not in gangs, Trump's response is the same. Clinton didn't have to deal with large scale foreign invasion of criminal gangs and the flood of fentanyl or the fact that the countries of origin won't take those gang members back. So give Clinton that hurdle on that subset of illegal immigrants and tell us how he would have responded and we can address whether he would have done it differently.
 
lol

Trump flat out told a group of donors that they could continue to employ the people who came here illegally.

Sure sounds like the people in the places you're talking about were NOT among that group of donors Trump told that to.

Maybe if the people in the places you are talking about didn't want to get raided,​
they should have been among that group of donors Trump talked to?​

🤷

What's the quote, Google is turning up empty.

the closest I came was this:


But that isn't what you claim he said, so I'll need your source.

In the above article Trump's plan is for gainfully employed, and otherwise law abiding illegal aliens to register with the Federal Government, be deported and fast tracked back to the US on a legal work permit... which isn't telling donors that it's OK to hire illegal aliens.
 
What's the quote, Google is turning up empty.
the closest I came was this:
But that isn't what you claim he said, so I'll need your source.
In the above article Trump's plan is for gainfully employed, and otherwise law abiding illegal aliens to register with the Federal Government, be deported and fast tracked back to the US on a legal work permit... which isn't telling donors that it's OK to hire illegal aliens.

your source says that Trump said the companies could continue to employ the people who came here illegally to take jobs


🤷
 
Again, no. For the action to be considered different, the action would be in response to the same situation. For illegal aliens that are not committing other crimes and not in gangs, Trump's response is the same. Clinton didn't have to deal with large scale foreign invasion of criminal gangs and the flood of fentanyl or the fact that the countries of origin won't take those gang members back. So give Clinton that hurdle on that subset of illegal immigrants and tell us how he would have responded and we can address whether he would have done it differently.
after you eat the cake, you no longer have it
 
your source says that Trump said the companies could continue to employ the people who came here illegally to take jobs


🤷

... The first paragraph of the article:

"President Donald Trump suggested at a Cabinet meeting Thursday that undocumented people working on farms and in hotels would be allowed to leave the country and return as legal workers if their employers vouched for them.

Why did you lie about reading the article? :rolleyes:
 
I was an eighties kid too. That spat ended in a Cobra Island civil war and and simultaneous invasions by both Destro and the Joes. So bring on the midterms...but whos Destro in this?

MTG?
I love the Eighties! Happiest time of my life. And G.I. Joe was boss!

Mark
 
So, about that.


why do interests payment fluctuate higher then GDP growth. are they adding in the 100 billions projected with tariff receipts? (Qs?)
These long term calculations have so many assumptions it's difficult to say which are forecast and just guessing

So far I'm seeing low inflation. the Big Beautiful Bill will stop tax increases . all growth factors. The problem is the deficits adding to the debt. Congress cant get a hold of spending. the mandatory entitlements have to get cut. I'd tax SSA for the entire income amount
There are things we can do, but Dems just want Trump to fail. and Republicans are fractured in purpose
 
Back
Top Bottom