CNN+ struggles to lure viewers in its early days, drawing fewer than 10,000 daily users

[The flaming lib]

Was this cnn + thing supposed to be the “new cnn” where they claim they are going to do factual reporting instead of Bias reporting? I’m waiting to see the new unbiased cnn. Got a feeling I’ll be waiting for quite a while

 

[HangLow]

CNN+ struggles to lure viewers in its early days, drawing fewer than 10,000 daily users

The paltry audience casts doubt on the future of CNN+ following the recently completed combination of Discovery and WarnerMedia

www.cnbc.com

--
Quite honestly, this (CNN+) may have the makings of a dismal failure.
With such a premier hot property as Chris Wallace, why waste him at CNN+? He would seem to be a much needed draw on the Cable Network Channel, no?
From the get-go, I was against putting Wallace at CNN+. His independent-thinking stance would be excellent at the cable channel.

​

 

[ttwtt78640]

Subscription news in general is in for a failure, though maybe not all for the same reasons. It’s corralling readers toward the lowest quality news sources.

You have to pay for Washington Post and New York Times. Fox News is free.

Who provides you with ”free” cable (internet or satellite) TV access to the Fox News channel?

 

[Cardinal]

Who provides you with ”free” cable (internet or satellite) TV access to the Fox News channel?

I’m talking about online news sources.

 

[RAMOSS]

View attachment 67387001​

That is because CNN got rolled up with Warner Discovery, and they have their own streaming service already. It makes for duplicate services, and the Warner Discovery streaming service is much more established.