• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

CNN desperately tries to rehabilitate Kyrsten Sinema, by allowing her to blatantly lie to their face.

CNN desperately tries to rehabilitate Kyrsten Sinema, by allowing her to blatantly lie to their face.​


File this under: "Give them enough rope, and they're bound to hang themselves"
 
Sinema is one senator who doesnt like doing her job.
 
In one post, you gave a faulty comparison between one Democratic Senator and the rest of her party.

Yeah, it's just one senator. Keep believing that. If it's not Sinema, it's Joe Manchin. If it's not Manchin it's Chris Coons. Or the Great Senate Parliamentarian. If all of these guys are replaced with progressives, then the deciding vote(s) will shift to another corporate hack and the goal post will be moved. It's a shell game. The notion that the Democratic party serves the interest of its voters is almost humorous at this point, and the only reason to vote for them is to forestall overt fascists in the Republican party. Joe Biden is almost useless, and Democratic Leadership is almost exactly aligned with Sinema and Manchin. Don't believe for a second there's significant daylight between them.

Anyways, back to the topic. CNN is desperate to rehabilitate Sinema, and next up is Joe Manchin.

Meanwhile, there is no Democratic agenda. It got left on the cutting room floor. And the audacity of these campaign slogans:



...is beyond the pale.
 
Yeah, it's just one senator. Keep believing that. If it's not Sinema, it's Joe Manchin. If it's not Manchin it's Chris Coons.

Oh yeah. Here comes the slippery slope. :rolleyes:

Or the Great Senate Parliamentarian. If all of these guys are replaced with progressives, then the deciding vote(s) will shift to another corporate hack and the goal post will be moved. It's a shell game. The notion that the Democratic party serves the interest of its voters is almost humorous at this point, and the only reason to vote for them is to forestall overt fascists in the Republican party. Joe Biden is almost useless, and Democratic Leadership is almost exactly aligned with Sinema and Manchin. Don't believe for a second there's significant daylight between them.

Anyways, back to the topic. CNN is desperate to rehabilitate Sinema, and next up is Joe Manchin.

:LOL:

Meanwhile, there is no Democratic agenda.

:ROFLMAO:

It got left on the cutting room floor. And the audacity of these campaign slogans:



...is beyond the pale.


So abortion rights mean nothing to you?
 
Arizona isn’t exactly a progressive state. Neither is West Virginia.

I don’t know why progressive think that just because these Senators are democrats, they’re progressives.

Would a progressive win in either state? Likely not.
 
Senator Sinema is doing a fine job.
She will pull many votes from the Republican side if she continues with her moderate voting.

Do agree CNN is propaganda most of the time.
 
I blocked all mentions of "Sinema" and "Manchin" from my Twitter feed. Did that make the problem of Sinema and Manchin go away? Obviously not. Did it lower my blood pressure and improve my Twitter experience by eleventy million percent? You bet your goddamn ass it did.
 
I blocked all mentions of "Sinema" and "Manchin" from my Twitter feed. Did that make the problem of Sinema and Manchin go away? Obviously not. Did it lower my blood pressure and improve my Twitter experience by eleventy million percent? You bet your goddamn ass it did.
Color all of us surprised
 
I blocked all mentions of "Sinema" and "Manchin" from my Twitter feed. Did that make the problem of Sinema and Manchin go away? Obviously not. Did it lower my blood pressure and improve my Twitter experience by eleventy million percent? You bet your goddamn ass it did.
Blocking all mention of Sinema and Manchin? Oh my? Thanks must be given to both Senators. They are the check to the radical democrats.
 
Yeah, it's just one senator. Keep believing that. If it's not Sinema, it's Joe Manchin. If it's not Manchin it's Chris Coons. Or the Great Senate Parliamentarian. If all of these guys are replaced with progressives, then the deciding vote(s) will shift to another corporate hack and the goal post will be moved. It's a shell game. The notion that the Democratic party serves the interest of its voters is almost humorous at this point, and the only reason to vote for them is to forestall overt fascists in the Republican party. Joe Biden is almost useless, and Democratic Leadership is almost exactly aligned with Sinema and Manchin. Don't believe for a second there's significant daylight between them.

Anyways, back to the topic. CNN is desperate to rehabilitate Sinema, and next up is Joe Manchin.

Meanwhile, there is no Democratic agenda. It got left on the cutting room floor. And the audacity of these campaign slogans:



...is beyond the pale.


Then maybe progressives should run better candidates than Jill Stein and Cynthia McKinney if they want to be taken seriously.
 
Kristen Sinema is garbage.

That being said, the progressives haven't done shit except shoot themselves in the foot.
 
Oh yeah. Here comes the slippery slope. :rolleyes:

There is no slippery slope here, only empirical reality.


Are you gullible enough to believe that Democratic Leadership actually supported the Build Back Better agenda?


See above. And didn't Biden spend his vacation at the home of David Rubenstein, voluntarily?

So abortion rights mean nothing to you?

So what are the Democrats doing about it if we elect more of them?
 
Then maybe progressives should run better candidates than Jill Stein and Cynthia McKinney if they want to be taken seriously.

Have you figured out a way to blame progressives yet for the upcoming midterm slaughter? If not, I'm sure FiveThirtyEight will provide one.
 

CNN desperately tries to rehabilitate Kyrsten Sinema, by allowing her to blatantly lie to their face.​


File this under: "Give them enough rope, and they're bound to hang themselves"

Not sure why people still watch this swill, anyway. I used to watch MSNBC, until I stood outside my bubble, and realized they are just as bad as the rest of them.
 
Have you figured out a way to blame progressives yet for the upcoming midterm slaughter? If not, I'm sure FiveThirtyEight will provide one.

Yawn. I’ll believe it when it see it. Until then, it reeks of fearmongering.

And again, if progressives want to be taken seriously they shouldn’t run nuts like Cynthia McKinney.
 
Arizona isn’t exactly a progressive state. Neither is West Virginia.

Based on what? Certainly not policy. Show me a non-billionaire in West Virginia who doesn't want lower prescription drug prices, paid family leave, higher wages, child tax credit, etc.

Would a progressive win in either state? Likely not.

The original outline for Biden's agenda had a 77% approval rate in West Virginia. If you can't win on those numbers, just ****ing give up politics.
 
Yawn. I’ll believe it when it see it. Until then, it reeks of fearmongering.

And when you believe it, you'll blame progressives, as is your usual method of operation.

And again, if progressives want to be taken seriously they shouldn’t run nuts like Cynthia McKinney.

Should they run Andrew Cuomo instead?
 
And when you believe it, you'll blame progressives, as is your usual method of operation.



Should they run Andrew Cuomo instead?

Even a moron like Andrew Cuomo would have been better than a woman who claimed “Zionists did 9/11”.
 
Back
Top Bottom