• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Clinton reportedly has ‘medical episode’ at 9/11 ceremony

The only reason why people are unable to let this issue go is because the person of interest is Hilliary Clinton, and the standard bias is that she is always lying unless she is telling the truth.

nonsense.

a well known person keeps getting caught dealing with something other then the truth.

the only reason this isn't a bigger deal in the media is they provide her shade because Trump terrifies them.
 
You know what lying through sampling error is? Catch every cough and clearing of the throat on video, compile it, and falsely create a "she's gonna die!" narrative. If the same was done to you it would give the perception that you had a week to live.



Also, love the anonymous witness story. This narrative is bull**** and I'm pretty sure you know that it's bull****.

You liberals are amazing. Whatever happens regarding Hillary, your common retort is in effect: "Let's move on...nothing to see here". What happened at the 911 ceremony was not pulled out of thin air by the right. It was breaking news coming from all news sources including left wing sources.
 
nonsense.

a well known person keeps getting caught dealing with something other then the truth.

the only reason this isn't a bigger deal in the media is they provide her shade because Trump terrifies them.

The press is not the only one terrified of a Trump impeachment.
 
You liberals are amazing. Whatever happens regarding Hillary, your common retort is in effect: "Let's move on...nothing to see here". What happened at the 911 ceremony was not pulled out of thin air by the right. It was breaking news coming from all news sources including left wing sources.

The sudden concern for women's health from the right is what surprises me.
 
Nice dodge but, you didn't address my question.

Do I need to say even more about the overreaction about her health? Was it wise, maybe not, but it was necessary to be there because she is a woman. She has to show no weakness because that will be held much more against her than it would against a male candidate IMO.
 
we don't know if any of this is the truth. On Saturday, she was not admitting to pneumonia, or that anything was wrong at all. the media is not going to uncover the truth either, and we all saw how this thread began. even when people are seeing things with their own eyes, her supporters will pretend we are crazy. they act pretty much like you are acting now.

Yep...the pneumonia claim came only after the suggestion of Hillary simply overheating in 80 degree weather with low humidity did not work. Based on the chronic cough, I can buy that she has pneumonia. I just do not necessarily buy that it is her primary illness. The coughing fits have been going on since she started her campaign. If she has pneumonia, it's probably secondary to whatever her real issue may be.
 
That is what I am talking about. It isn't about what you care about. It is about what large portions of her base thinks. That was my point in the first place. Their perception is relevant.

Did DWS tamper with ballots? Did she award delegates to Clinton that should have gone to Sander's.

Extraordinary claims take extraordinary evidence and so far I have not seen anything.

Hilliary Clinton won fair and square.
 
The press is not the only one terrified of a Trump impeachment.

the press not reporting because of their bias is scary too. you would agree if you didn't have the same agenda, and since I don't think you have the same integrity I have, here we are.
 
For your information, we were highly concerned about what would happen if President McCain had to resign and Sarah Palin got the nuclear codes.

Off topic, but what would make you worry about Palin and the codes?
 
the press not reporting because of their bias is scary too. you would agree if you didn't have the same agenda, and since I don't think you have the same integrity I have, here we are.

Have we met? Only ask as you seem to presume much?
 
No, I just don't like people saying that the system was rigged when Hilliary won the primary fair and square.

When Hillary had roughly 500 delegates before the first damn primary vote was taken in any state, that's not what any objective person would call "fair and square". As long as the democrats maintain that ludicrous super-delegate system where the super delegates are not accountable to any actual voters, their presidential primary system is effectively rigged.Hillary stated out with a 500 delegate lead. That's hard for any challenger to overcome.
 
I'm more confident that your position will be whatever is best for Hillary because it is what is best for Hillary

What is best is keeping Trump from the WH, and his finger away from the launch codes.
 
When Hillary had roughly 500 delegates before the first damn primary vote was taken in any state, that's not what any objective person would call "fair and square". As long as the democrats maintain that ludicrous super-delegate system where the super delegates are not accountable to any actual voters, their presidential primary system is effectively rigged.Hillary stated out with a 500 delegate lead. That's hard for any challenger to overcome.

Is there a rule prohibiting super delegates from endorsing early?
 
Did DWS tamper with ballots? Did she award delegates to Clinton that should have gone to Sander's.

Extraordinary claims take extraordinary evidence and so far I have not seen anything.

Hilliary Clinton won fair and square.

You are arguing a different point than I am and you still aren't getting it. Never mind.
 
No I seriously want to know, what makes you think the primary election was rigged If no dirty tricks occurred?

I was never arguing against that point. I explained what I said, twice, and you still missed it. Like I said, nevermind.
 
Back
Top Bottom