- Joined
- Jul 27, 2014
- Messages
- 17,226
- Reaction score
- 6,895
- Location
- Mountains
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian - Right
You are not making any sense Nimby.
I'm so glad you posted something other than rhetoric !!
So Hillary has a wikipedia fan, so she's a scumbag.
Hillary made money off of investments, so she's a scumbag.
Hillary used a private email server, like her predecessor, so she's a scumbag (notice the NARA guy said what she did might be unusual, but not illegal).
Hillary has been accused of helping someone get a loan, so she's a scumbag (never you mind that the FBI found no wrongdoing).
Lastly, independent investigator Ken Starr found no evidence of wrongdoing after Hillary was accused of participating in Filegate by her *surprise* political opponents.
I KNOW WHY YOU GUYS ARE SO UPSET NOW!! I understand!! You're not mad because you have any actual proof that she's a scumbag, you're mad that she keeps making a fool out of her accusers!
Nine days until the Carnival-Barking Clown show. :lol:
Priebus/McConnell must feel like they're tied to the whipping post.
Or might that be getting dragged behind an anhydrous ammonia truck spraying a farm field ? :lamo
You are not making any sense Nimby.
(1)The state was looking to put the blame on the video.
(2)The state believed the video was related to the attack.
What's the difference between (1) and (2) ? Intent. You can't speculate someone's intent. The idea that the video was related ended up being true. So ditch that accusation. It's a bunch of partisan BS.
Libya gave us 3 days warning ?? Lol... Cite source or abandon claim. Thanks.
Try again. :roll: She used a private server and gave up a breach of National Security. She also gave up a breach to the WH.
She also discussed classified information with Sidney Blumenthal who had no security clearance.
She lied about sending out emails to Blumenthal.
Her aides also used private servers giving up breaches of Security.
Moreover we aren't upset.....were not the ones that have been brainwashed into believing Hillary is more than what she actually is and ever was. Just a feminist that got to be the First Lady. Anything after that, are nothing more than tokenships of what she was never cut out for.
Like actual reality.
The video was never related. Abandon the claim. :roll: Now you are playing like BO peep and going for some Hope and Change. :lamo
I already gave it to you with the President of Libya telling Face the Nation with the Benghazi Timeline from FactCheck.org. But I am sure I can find another for you.
Libya: We gave US three-day warning of Benghazi attack .....
American diplomats were warned of possible violent unrest in Benghazi three days before the killings of US Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three members of his team, Libyan security officials say. The claim came as the country's interim President, Mohammed el-Megarif, said his government had information that the attack on the US consulate had been planned by an Islamist group with links to al-Qa'ida and with foreigners taking part. However, the American ambassador to the UN, Susan Rice, insisted that the killings had resulted from a demonstration against a film about the Prophet Mohamed, replicating protests in Cairo, which had been "hijacked" and got out of control.
The Independent has reported diplomatic sources who said that the threat of an attack against US interests in the region was known to the US administration 48 hours before it took place. The alert was issued by the State Department's Bureau of Diplomatic Security, but not made public. A State Department spokesman maintained: "We are not aware of any actionable intelligence indicating that an attack on the US Mission in Benghazi was planned or imminent.
A senior official of the biggest militia in Benghazi, the February 17th Brigade, told CNN that he had warned US diplomats of a rapidly deteriorating security situation in Benghazi three days before the attack. "The situation is frightening, it scares us," he said he had stressed during the meeting. Mr Stevens had been back in Libya for only a short time before US security officials decided it would be safe to make the journey to Benghazi during the anniversary of the 9/11 attacks. The British consulate in the city was shut after an ambush of a convoy carrying Dominic Asquith, the UK ambassador, in which his bodyguard were injured. The UN and International Committee of the Red Cross offices had been bombed and there had been a spate of political assassinations.....snip~
Libya: We gave US three-day warning of Benghazi attack - Africa - World - The Independent
Seems you need to do some studying.....so that you have some sort of Idea as to what you are talking about. Rather than spew Leftist talking points.
Nope. I cited a source. The video was related. Try again.
Advance warning?? Boy, this is news to the US government!!!
From the senate select committee:
"There was no singular "tactical warning" in the intelligence reporting leading up to the events on September 11, 2012, predicting an attack on U.S. facilities in Benghazi on the 9/11 anniversary, although State and the CIA both sent general warning notices to facilities worldwide noting the potential security concerns associated with the anniversary. Such a specific warning should not have been expected, however, given the limited intelligence collection of the Benghazi area at the time.
To date, the Committee has not identified any intelligence or other information received prior to September 11, 2012, by the IC or State Department indicating specific terrorist planning to attack the U.S. facilities in Benghazi on September 11, 2012."
Got any evidence for any of this? Or do i just throw this into the massive pile of nonsense thrown Hillary's way by scared little conservatives that know their pathetic showing of front runners for presidential nomination are a batch of mantra preaching mannequins?
The fact-checkers.....none of them (5 or 6 of them) got that part wrong. Then there is your source.
No this isn't news to the US Government. They knew all along and knew what was going on from the second attack and from the failed attempt to kill the UK Ambassador.
Oh, from one of the Older Senate Select committees. :roll: That's why you need to study some more.
The President of Libya went on BBC news before he came to the US and went on Face the Nation and the Radio.
Next!
Look up what BO peeps CIA man Mike Morell that went and made the circuit was saying. Of course don't let those 2 hacks into the State Dept and the 2 into the WH fool you.
As for the rest.....the NY times and few others already showed Hillary's lies over Blumenthal and the emails. You were given a link to a bunch of threads on each of those issues. Your welcome to take them on. Although you will need up-to-date sources. Just sayin.
Explain to me how an "older" senate select committee somehow couldn't find this "evidence."
I already noticed your rhetorical ploy- is there some "newer" senate select committee that DID reverse this ? Or are you just blowing more hot smoke ?
Oh that's simple.....records and documents. Plus certain people had not testified. Then you had Hillary only recently giving up all her material. That which she could have gave up to the first committee. Why didn't she back then? Why did she hold the records thru 6 Benghazi committees?
Also certain FOIA's were implemented and dripped out here and there until the AP and Judicial Watch made an issue out of it.
Do you think that came from this Committee headed by Gowdy?
First paragraph doesn't make sense to me. If you have a claim, make it and cite it please.
New York Times' botched their Clinton accusation horribly. They printed a retraction. That just got skipped over by your selective review of the actual news.
This is a bunch of rhetoric.
Hillary provided records.
Cite a source to counter my claim or abandon your rebuttal.
What committee is this again. How many have there been? Did you think there was just one?
You need to go and check out those threads. Then get back me when you have caught up with whats happened.
You can do your own homework for that which made the daily news. Its not that difficult to figure out. BO, Barack Obama - The Peep. His director of the CIA Mike Morell went and made the rounds talking about Hillarys server and why He and the CIA plus other Intel and Military people all think and believe Hillary's Server was hacked. By the Russians and Chinese.
Which don't count the Romanian Hacker that got to her and her pal Blumenthal.
BeNGHAZIIIIIIIIIII!@!!!!1111!!
BeNGHAZIIIIIIIIIII!@!!!!1111!!
Look up what BO peeps CIA man Mike Morell that went and made the circuit was saying. Of course don't let those 2 hacks into the State Dept and the 2 into the WH fool you.
As for the rest.....the NY times and few others already showed Hillary's lies over Blumenthal and the emails. You were given a link to a bunch of threads on each of those issues. Your welcome to take them on. Although you will need up-to-date sources. Just sayin.
I admit i don't keep careful track of how many times conservatives beat dead horses like Benghazi and repealing the ACA.
I admit i don't keep careful track of how many times conservatives beat dead horses like Benghazi and repealing the ACA.
I read another story that said her server was set up by the secret service and there's no actual reason to believe they were hacked.
Now we have heresy vs heresy. Stalemate!
I marvel at your patience. I have a pig that I want you to teach to sing.