CLINTON FAILED TO HAND OVER KEY EMAIL TO STATE DEPARTMENT
BY MICHAEL BIESECKER
ASSOCIATED PRESS
Jun 23, 5:30 PM EDT
WASHINGTON (AP) -- Former Secretary Hillary Clinton failed to turn over a copy of a key message involving problems caused by her use of a private homebrew email server, the State Department confirmed Thursday. The disclosure makes it unclear what other work-related emails may have been deleted by the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee.
The email was included within messages exchanged Nov. 13, 2010, between Clinton and one of her closest aides, Deputy Chief of Staff Huma Abedin. At the time, emails sent from Clinton's BlackBerry device and routed through her private clintonemail.com server in the basement of her New York home were being blocked by the State Department's spam filter. A suggested remedy was for Clinton to obtain a state.gov email account.
"Let's get separate address or device but I don't want any risk of the personal being accessible," Clinton responded to Abedin.
Clinton never used a government account that was set up for her, instead continuing to rely on her private server until leaving office.
The email was not among the tens of thousands of emails Clinton turned over to the agency in response to public records lawsuits seeking copies of her official correspondence. Abedin, who also used a private account on Clinton's server, provided a copy from her own inbox after the State Department asked her to return any work-related emails. That copy of the email was publicly cited last month in a blistering audit by the State Department's inspector general that concluded Clinton and her team ignored clear internal guidance that her email setup violated federal standards and could have left sensitive material vulnerable to hackers.
Criteria to delete still unknown...
Former Secretary Hillary Clinton failed to turn over a copy of a key message involving problems caused by her use of a private homebrew email server, the State Department confirmed Thursday. The disclosure makes it unclear what other work-related emails may have been deleted by the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee.
News from The Associated Press
| Moderator's Warning: |
You know, you could save yourself a lot of reading, linking, and keystrokes if instead of focusing on Hillary's wrongs you focused on what she got right. Just sayin'...
That would be a very shortened list.
That would be a very shortened list.
You seem sure there would even BE a list, you know something the rest don't?
| Moderator's Warning: |
This email might just be the "smoking gun" proving that Clinton was told the risk of using her personal server, willfully ignored those risks, and then tried to cover up the fact she knew, by withholding this email from her work related emails turned over to the State Department.
That would be a very shortened list.
I rather think it would not be a list either.......
But more so a 2 volume book.............:lamo
Only if they're comic books. Which would make sense considering we ARE talking about Hillary R. Clinton after all.
This email might just be the "smoking gun" proving that Clinton was told the risk of using her personal server, willfully ignored those risks, and then tried to cover up the fact she knew, by withholding this email from her work related emails turned over to the State Department.
ZOMG!!!! This is the one. This will be the final straw that will bring her down. Any moment now she'll be getting frog-marched. Kind of tired though so wake me up when the video is live.
First of all, I do not think we will ever see Hillary getting frog marched anywhere ever. It is my steadfast belief that they have yet to make cankle chains large enough to fit her thunder thighness, queen of the predetermined DNC coronation.ZOMG!!!! This is the one. This will be the final straw that will bring her down. Any moment now she'll be getting frog-marched. Kind of tired though so wake me up when the video is live.
First of all, I do not think we will ever see Hillary getting frog marched anywhere ever. It is my steadfast belief that they have yet to make cankle chains large enough to fit her thunder thighness, queen of the predetermined DNC coronation.
So, I know this disadvantages a Progressive, logic not being a specialty required/desired, but can you give us some guesses as to good reasons she would be more inclined to be more concerned about her private emails being accessible than the highest state secrets?
I can think of a few, but lets see what you else you can come up with. The only semi-legit ones that immediately come to mind is if she had a lover, either male or female, that she did not want to become public record, or maybe she has some incurable illness that might preclude her running for president that she wanted to hide, some form of addiction such as an inordinate number of personal pizza deliveries per night to her residence or hotel room...
And while those might be semi-legit, they most certainly are not valid in comparison to risking state secrets being jeopardized. So lets hear it... what might be that important?
That would be a very shortened list.
This email might just be the "smoking gun" proving that Clinton was told the risk of using her personal server, willfully ignored those risks, and then tried to cover up the fact she knew, by withholding this email from her work related emails turned over to the State Department.
SO WHAT........
Did you read in the news report.........
".....“No known federal laws were violated and some omissions could be blamed on Clinton's highly fluid schedule, which sometimes forced late cancellations. But only seven meetings in Clinton's planning schedules were replaced by substitute events on her official calendar..... OR..... "...as government records experts said that secretaries of state have wide latitude in keeping their schedules..."
Again.....where's your smoking gun?
I think you have your threads mixed up.
This is another Clinton blunder that came out the day before, showing yet again just how secretive and untrustworthy she is.
Read post 1 again.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?