• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Clinton Campaign Will Participate in Stein’s State Recounts

zimmer

Educating the Ignorant
Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Dec 19, 2008
Messages
24,380
Reaction score
7,805
Location
Worldwide
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Conservative
Isn't this rich... all the talk about Trump not accepting election results... Trump voters protesting...

ROTFLMFAO...

They really want to **** their party even worse.

You Go Girl!

Oh wow, I thought the recount stunk before, now it's an absolute open sewer. As if everyone didn't know Hillary was involved from the start.
 
Oh wow, I thought the recount stunk before, now it's an absolute open sewer. As if everyone didn't know Hillary was involved from the start.

I like that this is still a thing. Still preemptively making excuses without evidence. Hillary, therefore bad.
 
Isn't this rich... all the talk about Trump not accepting election results... Trump voters protesting...

ROTFLMFAO...

They really want to **** their party even worse.

You Go Girl!

This is why HRC couldn't inspire the D base to turn out for her in the first place; her complete lack of scruples and ethics.

Prior to Nov 8, the big story coming out of Wisconsin was DNC operatives admitting on tape to committing voter fraud. Now 3 weeks after the election, HRC feels like she has the necessary votes to win a recount. Did more DNC operatives find a way to throw some ballots in the trash? It's happened before.
 
The party of fraud wants one more go around.

They are outside the margin of error in Wisconsin, so it's all about fraud and how who the Clinton Foundation owns in Wisconsin.
 
I wonder how much the campaign donated to stein's effort. They knew they couldn't do anything outwardly, after their complaints about trump not accepting the results...

I suspect they were doing a lot behind the scenes (quietly of course), though.
 
Actually, it's more of a fund raising gimmick. No doubt the Foundation is using it, too.
 
Well, on the one hand it is a valid part of the process. Recounts happen all the time at all levels of elections...even in High School. ;)

The issues I have with this attempt include:

1. Jill Stein being the point person for this recount. She has no political dog in this fight because she had the lowest vote support in each challenged State and virtually no chance of winning any electoral votes. Her motivations and the rapidity of successful funding are questionable.

2. Accepting the results. Hillary made much of Trump's unwillingness to commit to accepting the election results, echoed by her avid supporters prior to her losing the election. That she is now willing to buy into this recount, with the rabid support of her disappointed constituents, points to the inherent hypocrisy of their ideological positions.

3. That they think there will be no repercussions among the millions of Americans who thought the process was fairly conducted, and were appalled by the often violent reactions of the so-called Party of Tolerance and Acceptance.

4. That Congress will select someone else. That there is some weird hope that even if Hillary doesn't get enough EC votes to win, if they can reduce the EC vote enough they can then get Congress (which is controlled by the Republican Party) to select someone other than Trump (i.e. Hillary) from the remaining candidates.

Still I am not overly concerned other than by a possible delay in Trump taking office.

IMO a recount will only solidify the fact Trump won the electoral votes, and demonstrate the validity of our Founder's electoral college system. I have no fears of this so...go ahead and recount. :coffeepap:
 
Last edited:
Well, on the one hand it is a valid part of the process. Recounts happen all the time at all levels of elections...even in High School. ;)

The issues I have with this attempt include:

1. Jill Stein being the point person for this recount. She has no political dog in this fight because she had the lowest vote support in each challenged State and virtually no chance of winning any electoral votes. Her motivations and the rapidity of successful funding are questionable.

2. Accepting the results. Hillary made much of Trump's unwillingness to commit to accepting the election results, echoed by her avid supporters prior to her losing the election. That she is now willing to buy into this recount, with the rabid support of her disappointed constituents, points to the inherent hypocrisy of their ideological positions.

3. That they think there will be no repercussions among the millions of Americans who thought the process was fairly conducted, and were appalled by the often violent reactions of the so-called Party of Tolerance and Acceptance.

4. That Congress will select someone else. That there is some weird hope that even if Hillary doesn't get enough EC votes to win, if they can reduce the EC vote enough they can then get Congress (which is controlled by the Republican Party) to select someone other than Trump (i.e. Hillary) from the remaining candidates.

Still I am not overly concerned other than by a possible delay in Trump taking office.

IMO a recount will only solidify the fact Trump won the electoral votes, and demonstrate the validity of our Founder's electoral college system. I have no fears of this so...go ahead and recount. :coffeepap:

WI had two recent elections with a closer margin and there was no recount.

Hey... I'm not complaining... I love to watch the Left implode... the more idiocy they commit while being a small minority... the better for the country... as more people will realize these folks are bonkers.
 
Isn't this rich... all the talk about Trump not accepting election results... Trump voters protesting...

ROTFLMFAO...

They really want to **** their party even worse.

You Go Girl!

liberal hypocrisy at it's finest.
it is now clear who put stein up to the recount.

this was a move by Clinton insiders or Clinton herself.

what a bunch of sore losers these people are.
spouting off for months to accept the election results then won't when they lose.
 
I like that this is still a thing. Still preemptively making excuses without evidence. Hillary, therefore bad.

no evidence of hacking so a recount isn't needed.
liberals just need to accept the fact she lost,
and do what they have been preaching for months
accept the election results.
 
I know that the results of the election aren't going to actually change, but I do have to say that this entire situation is bringing a ray of sunshine into my life. :lol:
 
Well, on the one hand it is a valid part of the process. Recounts happen all the time at all levels of elections...even in High School. ;)

The issues I have with this attempt include:

1. Jill Stein being the point person for this recount. She has no political dog in this fight because she had the lowest vote support in each challenged State and virtually no chance of winning any electoral votes. Her motivations and the rapidity of successful funding are questionable.

2. Accepting the results. Hillary made much of Trump's unwillingness to commit to accepting the election results, echoed by her avid supporters prior to her losing the election. That she is now willing to buy into this recount, with the rabid support of her disappointed constituents, points to the inherent hypocrisy of their ideological positions.

3. That they think there will be no repercussions among the millions of Americans who thought the process was fairly conducted, and were appalled by the often violent reactions of the so-called Party of Tolerance and Acceptance.

4. That Congress will select someone else. That there is some weird hope that even if Hillary doesn't get enough EC votes to win, if they can reduce the EC vote enough they can then get Congress (which is controlled by the Republican Party) to select someone other than Trump (i.e. Hillary) from the remaining candidates.

Still I am not overly concerned other than by a possible delay in Trump taking office.

IMO a recount will only solidify the fact Trump won the electoral votes, and demonstrate the validity of our Founder's electoral college system. I have no fears of this so...go ahead and recount. :coffeepap:

voters should be outraged at this nonsense. 1 person is attempting to thwart a legal election.
the goal here is to make or try to make these 3 states not be able to get their electors in on time.

while she can make WI do a recount I don't see where she can make MI or PA do it or they can reject it based on
her lack of evidence.

in MI she has to prove that she was frauded out her 1% of the vote there. she can't request a recount for Clinton.
in PA she can only appeal the result it will be up to the county to decide if a recount is needed.

a judge can do it but she would have to supply actual evidence that it was hacked.
 
I know that the results of the election aren't going to actually change, but I do have to say that this entire situation is bringing a ray of sunshine into my life. :lol:

Enjoy it while you can. That ray of sunshine's about to be blotted out by the darkness. ;)
 
Actually, what is Jill Stein is just going to say "psych!!! This was just a Green Party Jobs program for people working the recount". Y'all can thank me for helping you get that Christmas present money!
 
Enjoy it while you can. That ray of sunshine's about to be blotted out by the darkness. ;)

I'm like a Brit when the sun comes out: I quickly take off my shirt and throw myself onto a lawn chair for the five minutes I'm given.
 
I wonder how many boxes of "uncounted ballots", all marked in favor of Hillary, will mysteriously turn up.
 
Actually, what is Jill Stein is just going to say "psych!!! This was just a Green Party Jobs program for people working the recount". Y'all can thank me for helping you get that Christmas present money!

Lawyers primarily.

Way To Go.

NOT.
 
I know that the results of the election aren't going to actually change, but I do have to say that this entire situation is bringing a ray of sunshine into my life. :lol:

Can I make fun of you when she loses a second time? :mrgreen:
 
Can I make fun of you when she loses a second time? :mrgreen:

Why? I don't think the recount will amount to anything. When I say that voter fraud isn't a problem, I actually believe that.
 
voters should be outraged at this nonsense. 1 person is attempting to thwart a legal election.
the goal here is to make or try to make these 3 states not be able to get their electors in on time.

while she can make WI do a recount I don't see where she can make MI or PA do it or they can reject it based on
her lack of evidence.

in MI she has to prove that she was frauded out her 1% of the vote there. she can't request a recount for Clinton.
in PA she can only appeal the result it will be up to the county to decide if a recount is needed.

a judge can do it but she would have to supply actual evidence that it was hacked.

I think you are spot on here. They get to spend millions to make Hillary look like twice the loser she already is.
 
liberal hypocrisy at it's finest.
it is now clear who put stein up to the recount.

this was a move by Clinton insiders or Clinton herself.

what a bunch of sore losers these people are.
spouting off for months to accept the election results then won't when they lose.

Donald Trump was whining for a goddamned year and a half that the system is rigged.And you cheered it right along with him. Now y'all are gonna be mad that someone is questioning the system!?
 
I know that the results of the election aren't going to actually change, but I do have to say that this entire situation is bringing a ray of sunshine into my life. :lol:

I see. Soooo, further damaging your brand, "brings a ray of sunshine" into your life. Hmmmm, interesting. Keep up the good work.
 
Donald Trump was whining for a goddamned year and a half that the system is rigged.And you cheered it right along with him. Now y'all are gonna be mad that someone is questioning the system!?

There is a difference between "the system is rigged" and "the votes were hacked", or whatever they are clutching at with this recount.

As proven without a doubt, the system was most certainly rigged. The emails, and Hillary's MSM partners proved that.

The recount? Fine, go for it.
 
Back
Top Bottom