Clinton Back up on the Hill to Testify, in the "hot seat."

[Pollycy]

I think it would be good or you to spend some time in some poorer neighborhoods. Get there early, 5-6 am and watch how many of these "parasites" are up, standing in the cold, waiting for a bus to go to work. See how many of these "parasites" are working 70+ hours a day. They may not be the best educated, but they are some of the hardest working people you'll ever meet.

Maybe you should consider this question, a business pays an employee minimum wage for 40 hrs a week. That's $15,000 / year. It is simply not possible for a single person to survive on that salary without some form of government assistance. That means it is not possible for ANY single person to fill that position unless they're getting assistance. No one could afford to take the job! So tell me, who's the real beneficiary of a government handout? The person working full time making X and receiving Y government benefits, or the business that would have to pay Y more in salary to fill an unsubsidised position?

I grew up poor, Mithros, at a time when there was no welfare-suck circus in existence provided to anybody by the government.

I took my first job when I was 13 years old, making 50 cents an hour, while my broken family lived in a ****ty one-bedroom apartment without hot water in the kitchen, located on top of a men's clothing store in a small town in Texas. We had to share the only bathroom located down a dark hallway with the drunk who lived in the other ****ty apartment up there. So, cry me a river....

If a person doesn't like the money he or she is making, then they can go get a different job. But nowhere is it written or implied that just because a person doesn't like the situation they're in that other people are responsible for GIVING them anything.

Parasite: Noun
"an organism that lives in or on another organism (its host) and benefits by deriving nutrients at the host's expense."

And it's your position that people who can't even support themselves should be empowered to make vital decisions for the entire United States?! No way in the world does that make sense!

But, it makes perfect sense to a ward-heeling Libocrat politician like Hillary Clinton, who has nothing to offer this nation but the promise of yet more and more and ever more welfare programs. It's been the Democrat Party's bread and butter since the 1930's....

 

[imyoda]

Dude, this is known and came out in the hearings. Try to keep up.

No.

HC is not responsible for making decisions for security requests...............Those decisions are to be made by security professionals in the State Department.............and if you were listening carefully you would know that 100 some odd requests were made by the Embassy...............many were granted while others were not......

Some times we listen and only hear what we believe or have prejudged the facts should be...............Just to meet and support what serves and bolster or belief system............ in this case those inconvenient facts do not support what you want to believe..............

Have you ever taken a course in critical thinking?

 

[j-mac]

No.

HC is not responsible for making decisions for security requests...............Those decisions are to be made by security professionals in the State Department.............and if you were listening carefully you would know that 100 some odd requests were made by the Embassy...............many were granted while others were not......

Some times we listen and only hear what we believe or have prejudged the facts should be...............Just to meet and support what serves and bolster or belief system............ in this case those inconvenient facts do not support what you want to believe..............

Have you ever taken a course in critical thinking?

Ad hom is not a win....The simple truth is that Hillary would have you believe that Chris Stevens was a personal friend of her's when she requested him for that job, then she showed that she was such a close friend of his that she ignored his requests, would not provide him with her phone number, while Ben Aflick got it....and the night of that attack, and while it was ongoing, she went home...That's some friend I tell ya.....whew....With friends like that...Well you know the rest.

 

[imyoda]

Ad hom is not a win....The simple truth is that Hillary would have you believe that Chris Stevens was a personal friend of her's when she requested him for that job, then she showed that she was such a close friend of his that she ignored his requests, would not provide him with her phone number, while Ben Aflick got it....and the night of that attack, and while it was ongoing, she went home...That's some friend I tell ya.....whew....With friends like that...Well you know the rest.

You might wish to bone up on your reading comprehension.....................because there is no personal attack..........unless you folks think your name is "WE"...........

And there ya go again with all the stuff Faux Noise and other RW operatives with talking points based upon assumptions and suppositions...........But Having been in your frame of mind at one point in my life...

I doubt you can process.........comprehend.........anything which challenges those claptrap beliefs which have been substituted for one being able to think for yourself..........

Now go back and reread the FACTS I posted and then tell us all how they square with reality........

Oh yes..............your post was a personal attack on HC................and done so without the courage of being direct............but suggesting the reader HC is one cold, callous SOB.........


Your turn.........

 

[Dittohead not!]

You might wish to bone up on your reading comprehension.....................because there is no personal attack..........unless you folks think your name is "WE"...........

And there ya go again with all the stuff Faux Noise and other RW operatives with talking points based upon assumptions and suppositions...........But Having been in your frame of mind at one point in my life...

I doubt you can process.........comprehend.........anything which challenges those claptrap beliefs which have been substituted for one being able to think for yourself..........

Now go back and reread the FACTS I posted and then tell us all how they square with reality........

Oh yes..............your post was a personal attack on HC................and done so without the courage of being direct............but suggesting the reader HC is one cold, callous SOB.........


Your turn.........

You start by saying, "There is no personal attack", then launch into an ad hominem attack.

What I'm wondering is,

Why?