• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Classified documents from Biden's time as VP discovered in private office, source says

Fourteen thousand and first time. No one would send their lawyers to do an archivist's job.


An archivist would find the docs and be bound by the same law that the lawyers followed- to report it immediately to authorities. An archivist would have set the same series of events in motion.

How does that help your 'lack of transparency' claim?
 
And you've been told time and tiem and time and time and again, that there is no process for the President to declassify documents.

Before, I kept on asking the procedure specifically a President must follow to declassify. So far, no one supplied one.
 
His entire defense (excuse?) is that he, who takes classified material very, very seriously,

If you call that a defense , I saw him say that,

never stored classified documents improperly and never saw any stashed in inappropriate places, thus anything found, even in his DC office, home(s) and garage must have been placed there by (unknown?) others.

When did Biden say any of that?
 
Before, I kept on asking the procedure specifically a President must follow to declassify. So far, no one supplied one.
It’s been posted here many times. Try to pay attention.
 
Before, I kept on asking the procedure specifically a President must follow to declassify. So far, no one supplied one.

1. Maybe because that requires an explanation long enough to write a book.

2. It's OT because it's not worth a hill of beans because Biden never claimed to have declassfied anything and there's different rules and procedures for different agencies.

3. Nobody is stopping you.
 
The POTUS IS the Executive Branch, therefore he has the singular authority to declassify. No statute changes that, period.

Not only that, he delegates the power to classification/declassify documents by the President Executive Order 13526.
 
I asked for a procedure that SPICIFICALLY mentions the President that he must follow.

This is all a red herring. Trump didn't declassify them. The easiest way to tell is the fact that those documents are still classified.

Classification isn't some mystical status - it's a real-world, functional status as information control. When some piece of information is declassified, that functional status changes - and more importantly, if that status doesn't change, the information isn't declassified.
 
I asked for a procedure that SPICIFICALLY mentions the President that he must follow.

Right, but if the current information doesn't allow us to know where they originated or what classification is involved, we can only guess about whether or not any particular documents were declassfied correctly .

Biden never claimed to have declassfied anything.

How would the written procedure help us understand what happened?
 
how can you say he cooperated? It is clear he has been hiding classified docs for at least six years.
False. It seems pretty obviously much more clear that he didn't know they were there.

I say he is cooperating, because he is handing over the docs as soon as it is discovered he has them.

Now compare that to refusing to do so for 16 months and then lying about it even after a search warrant.

Now you see the difference between cooperating and not cooperating. Always glad to clarify.
 
Point being we don't know. Yet. Fact remains no POTUS can declassify nuclear secrets.

The Department of Energy, classifys nuclear information. The Department of Energy is under the Executive branch that gets its classification powers by Executive Order 13526, the President.

It would make no sense , what so ever, the President couldn't declassify nuclear secrets that he deligates down to the Department of Energy.
 
so hiding classified information in multiple locations for 2-10 years isn't a big deal for you?
Non sequitur. Strawman. Red herring. Weak sauce.

Also you might want to buy a dictionary and look up "hiding".
 
The Department of Energy, classifys nuclear information. The Department of Energy is under the Executive branch that gets its classification powers by Executive Order 13526, the President.

That's not accurate. Nuclear information is "classified" by statute, not by EO.
 
False. It seems pretty obviously much more clear that he didn't know they were there.

I say he is cooperating, because he is handing over the docs as soon as it is discovered he has them.

Now compare that to refusing to do so for 16 months and then lying about it even after a search warrant.

Now you see the difference between cooperating and not cooperating. Always glad to clarify.
So, you are telling us that Biden who is the ex-VP and current POTUS has dementia :unsure: :unsure: :unsure:
 
So, you are telling us that Biden who is the ex-VP and current POTUS has dementia
No, that's your non sequitur. If you would like to argue he has dementia because he didn't know what was in those boxes, be my guest. Make your own points.

And if you want to respond to my actual points -- instead of inventing non sequiturs -- step up to the plate.
 
No, that's your non sequitur. If you would like to argue he has dementia because he didn't know what was in those boxes, be my guest. Make your own points.

And if you want to respond to my actual points -- instead of inventing non sequiturs -- step up to the plate.
I am not saying that he has dementia. You are saying he has dementia because he does not remember he has placed classified docs in multi-insecurity locations
 
If Biden is issued a subpoena and says no, then it would be comparable to trump. That hasn't happened.
For the record, this none of this would even have been newsworthy, until Biden and the Democrats decided to try and criminalize the Presidential records act. Ironic, how Biden created the very thing that he is now in trouble for.

Seems to get worse every day for Biden. It's always the cover up that gets them.
 
You are saying he has dementia because he does not remember he has placed classified docs in multi-insecurity locations
False. That's your non sequitur. This dimestore troll con isn't going to work for you, sorry.

You're saying that means he has dementia. How very special of you.
 
You can't conduct raids in the United States without showing the court that a crime was likely committed AND that evidence of that crime is very likely to be found at the site of the search. In the Biden case, they can show neither. In the Trump case, they showed both.

Do you not understand why a search warrant was served on Trump?
Yes, because the election was coming up and they needed headlines, that's why they got that general warrant. Now, it's blown up in their collective faces. Biden is looking pretty bad.
 
Yes, because the election was coming up and they needed headlines, that's why they got that general warrant.
So the AG, the other prosecutors, the judge...

You are accusing them all, right now, of corruptly (which is to say, criminally) creating a false warrant.

So do I have that right? They are all corrupt liars. And you make these accusations of quite a few people you know nothing about to shield one Donald J Trump.

But nah... it's not a cult...
 
Back
Top Bottom