Soap, the intentionally obtuse thing isn't working for ya.
You didn't answer. Why is an archivist better than a lawyer? Is there something applicable here that an archivist could do but a lawyer can't?
Maybe pick one of these -
1. Biden was told that the Penn Center offices had to be cleared out. He knew/remembered that there were TS docs there so he should have
a. Told his lawyers to find them and give them to the NARA.
b. Hired an archivist, who would quickly find, and lawfully report secret docs to NARA.
c. Should have gotten some dumb movers so no one would ever find out.
2. Biden was told that the Penn Center offices had to be cleared out. He remembered there was some important stuff and should have -
a. Told his lawyers to get it organized and ready to be moved out.
b. Hired an archivist to get it organized and ready to be moved out.
***
The Penn Center Nov. 2 ,
DE garage, Dec. 22
DE personal library Jan 11 , 12
Beach home DE, (docs found =0)
Is there anywhere else they should look?
There were 3 locations where as many as 30 docs have been found.
in two locations documents were found on different days. The number from the personal library is 6 . On a calendar it looks like the trickle is a matter of the results of a search being announced before the search was concluded. Yesterday the Times wrote that the Biden legal team has finished .
No requests have come from NARA for additional docs. The FBI hasn't requested further actions. No subpeona has been issued. Hur is on the job. That's why I'm asking if transparency is an issue at this point in the story. And I can't get a straight answer about what this theory is. How did his lawyers help him hide something? When it appears they helped by reacting to the discovery by stopping the inventory and calling in the authorities. That's what the law calls for in that event.
How and why did his lawyers help him hide anything?