Well?
Not going to load the 1st post with evidence for my opinion. I will let the poll speak for itself.
Well?
Not going to load the 1st post with evidence for my opinion. I will let the poll speak for itself.
well you leave out a very important part . . . Safer than what?
Well you leave out a very important part . . . Safer than what?
Safer than a society that bans civilians from owning guns
it makes homeowners safer
Like Mexico?
Like Australia
At the end of the day I feel 1,000 times more safe in Canada than anywhere in the US.
Australia banned guns for personal protection.Civilians in Australia are allowed to own guns.
I made a change to the wording for my vote. That is IMHO although I do not own a gun it makes homeowners safer. Especially in suburban and rural area, where police response time will not be fast enough if someone breaks into my home. Actually thought about getting a gun during the riots of 2020.
Australia banned guns for personal protection.
Would you be down to do the same here?
Foreign threats who know we are one of the most armed populations in the world.
Which is meaningless, because you can own one for sport shooting, and still use it to murder people.
Rigorous permitting of select guns sounds like common sense regulation to me. You down for that?
It occurs to me that you talk a lot about drunk driving. We have laws against drunk driving, yet people still do it. Maybe we should abolish those laws because they don’t stop 100% of drunk driving
Foreign countries are skeered to try a land invasion of the USA because they know JoeBob and Cletus-Sue have AR15s. LMAO. Spectacularly stupid concept imo.
No, I'm not, any more than I'm down for "rigorous permitting" for consumption of "select" types of alcohol.
That's a silly comment. I don't know anyone who seriously thinks we should abolish the gun laws we currently have.
Reasonable minds can differ over whether we should have stricter gun laws or driving laws. If the people who are pushing for stricter gun laws really cared about saving lives, however, they would be focusing a significant portion of those efforts on saving lives from drunk and reckless drivers. But they don't do that because they're hypocrites: they only care about saving lives if it requires OTHER people to give up something.
the fact that we have an armed population is likely daunting.
Which we do, moonshine is illegal.
That’s not what pro-Gun people say. They say that since criminals break laws, more laws are pointless.
Cars, booze, and guns are not equal. Cars serve a purpose.
Obviously we tolerate a lot of collateral damage because of their use case.
Alcohol is more debatable. Guns have the weakest use case. How can one argue it’s necessary they must shoot skeet in order to get through life.