• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

China built hundreds of AI data centers to catch the AI boom. Now many stand unused. - MIT Technology Review (1 Viewer)

Surrealistik

DP Veteran
Joined
Dec 6, 2015
Messages
11,772
Reaction score
7,644
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Undisclosed

A year or so ago, Xiao Li was seeing floods of Nvidia chip deals on WeChat. A real estate contractor turned data center project manager, he had pivoted to AI infrastructure in 2023, drawn by the promise of China’s AI craze.

At that time, traders in his circle bragged about securing shipments of high-performing Nvidia GPUs that were subject to US export restrictions. Many were smuggled through overseas channels to Shenzhen. At the height of the demand, a single Nvidia H100 chip, a kind that is essential to training AI models, could sell for up to 200,000 yuan ($28,000) on the black market.

Now, his WeChat feed and industry group chats tell a different story. Traders are more discreet in their dealings, and prices have come back down to earth. Meanwhile, two data center projects Li is familiar with are struggling to secure further funding from investors who anticipate poor returns, forcing project leads to sell off surplus GPUs. “It seems like everyone is selling, but few are buying,” he says.

Just months ago, a boom in data center construction was at its height, fueled by both government and private investors. However, many newly built facilities are now sitting empty. According to people on the ground who spoke to MIT Technology Review—including contractors, an executive at a GPU server company, and project managers—most of the companies running these data centers are struggling to stay afloat. The local Chinese outlets Jiazi Guangnian and 36Kr report that up to 80% of China’s newly built computing resources remain unused.

Tech reporting/analysis website mainstay Tom's Hardware is even less optimistic:


Triggered by the rise of generative AI applications, China rapidly expanded its AI infrastructure in 2023 – 2024 and built hundreds of new data centers using both state and private funding. But this boom has since lost momentum. Facilities that cost billions of dollars now sit underused, returns are falling, and the market for GPU rentals has collapsed. To make the matters worse, many data centers became outdated before they were even fully operational as market conditions have changed, according to MIT Technology Review.

Personally I find none of this surprising in light of the fundamental unprofitability of the overwhelming majority of AI enterprises (which bleed if not hemorrhage money), both now and in the foreseeable future and the sheer impossibility of many data center build projections which would demand implausible if not outright impossible expansions of energy infrastructure. While Deep Seek has certainly hurt the case for hardware and data centers (ironically this has also done substantial damage to Chinese business interests as mentioned in the above article), this decline in interest was already ongoing prior to its advent as investor interest gradually (and understandably) began to cool with regards to AI. This state of affairs should be heeded with concern not just in China, but domestically as well as the AI bubble appears poised to deflate; one that Wall Street has invested heavily in.
 
Part of the problem with communism (or state-run corporatism or whatever China thinks it is now) is that the central planners are constantly guessing how much to allocate to their various economic engines. And they often guess wrong. Which is why in China, you can see plenty of lightly-used superhighways, entire ghost cities, and wasted AI centers...even as the country's real estate market and financial system teeter on collapse.

Communism is horrible.
 
Part of the problem with communism (or state-run corporatism or whatever China thinks it is now) is that the central planners are constantly guessing how much to allocate to their various economic engines. And they often guess wrong. Which is why in China, you can see plenty of lightly-used superhighways, entire ghost cities, and wasted AI centers...even as the country's real estate market and financial system teeter on collapse.

Communism is horrible.
Unfortunately AI is also very much a bubble over here as well, with the sector facing many of the same fundamental issues.
 
Part of the problem with communism (or state-run corporatism or whatever China thinks it is now) is that the central planners are constantly guessing how much to allocate to their various economic engines. And they often guess wrong. Which is why in China, you can see plenty of lightly-used superhighways, entire ghost cities, and wasted AI centers...even as the country's real estate market and financial system teeter on collapse.

Communism is horrible.



Command economies
 
Part of the problem with communism (or state-run corporatism or whatever China thinks it is now) is that the central planners are constantly guessing how much to allocate to their various economic engines. And they often guess wrong. Which is why in China, you can see plenty of lightly-used superhighways, entire ghost cities, and wasted AI centers...even as the country's real estate market and financial system teeter on collapse.

Communism is horrible.


Which China is not.

The highways etc are make work projects,

The data centers were primarily private companies developing them, the mass housing also done from private companies. Chinese people tend not to trust banks and prefer property to store wealth. Many middle class Chinese brought multiple properties as a store of wealth.

So much like the Tulip mania people brought and developers built to meet the demand
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom