- Joined
- Aug 3, 2011
- Messages
- 2,149
- Reaction score
- 1,187
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian - Right
Just like I can't say I'm surprised at the excuse making whiners from the left.
Can't say I'm really shocked that the conservatives in this thread couldn't understand a fairly straightforward article that makes a somewhat tired but altogether solid point.
When you say Posts like yours, however, seem like you are making excuses for failure, instead of encouraging progress.
I tire of this site.
Maybe he was high and wanted to feel the rain on his face. Is that now a reason to be shot by a cowboy who probably should never have been issued a CCW?
Wtf?What evidence other than Zimmerman's already discredited statements show that Martin peered into windows?
Has it crossed your mind that one being on neighborhood watch has the responsibility of "looking for trouble"?
no...but attacking a guy because you are high and over-reacted when he asked you a question is.
Wtf?
Come back to reality.
His account, which is the evidence, has not been discredited.
Wrong.The original cop investigating the crime said Z was "less than truthful. And, Z's claim that the boy was looking into windows was never corroborated. You'd think that someone other than the paranoid George would have noticed that.
The Black Ghetto on the Southside of Chicago has been a White man created and enforced segregated community since the 1920's.
Too bad Trayvon wasn't armed, then both of those idiots could have stood their ground, fulfilling a gun nutter's wet dream.Wrong.
You are confused by what was said and what was meant.
Provide the quote so I can point it out. Because the officers involved believed him.
And in no way discredited what he said.
Just like your claim of not looking into homes was wrong, you will also be proven wrong on this as well.
Secondly, Trayvon's looking into windows does not need to be corroborated.
Zimmerman suspicion was sufficient and was all that was needed. Period.
Suspicion is subjective. What you find suspicious, another might not, and vise versa.
An officer was dispatched.
That is all that matters to that point.
:dohToo bad Trayvon wasn't armed, then both of those idiots could have stood their ground, fulfilling a gun nutter's wet dream.
:doh
Trayvon was not standing his ground.
He attacked.
Had he been armed, the police would still be looking for a black male that shot Zimmerman.
Yes I do know he attacked.You don't know that he attacked. The jury simply found reasonable doubt in the prosecution's case that Zimmerman shot him for no reason.
I have to agree with Fisher.
Too bad Trayvon wasn't armed, then both of those idiots could have stood their ground, fulfilling a gun nutter's wet dream.
Yes I do know he attacked.
It is the evidence.
Nothing refutes that evidence.
No, Martin would have commited murder with his gun and would be in a jail cell right now. Martin was looking for a fight.
Martin was walking home from the store, minding his own business. What planet do you live on? Your reality doesn't match that of anyone else I've encountered yet regarding this issue.
Martin was walking home from the store, minding his own business. .
Wrong.Nothing supports it either.
Dude, the trial is over, Zimmerman was believed. That means his account was accepted. Get over it. We know his account is accurate and that there is no valid reason to disbelieve him.All we know for sure is that Trayvon was walking home from the store; Zimmerman found him to be suspicious enough to call the cops; some kind of confrontation ensued after Zimmerman left his vehicle, which he was asked not to do, and the unarmed Tryvon ended up shot dead by Zimmerman, who admitted shooting him.
It wasn't some kind of confrontation. It was an attack. That is the evidence. Learn it.some kind of confrontation ensued
You have already been corrected on this. He was never told any such thing.after Zimmerman left his vehicle, which he was asked not to do,
No he was not minding his own business.Martin was walking home from the store, minding his own business.
To claim that the ghettoes of Chicago, and all the violent deaths that flow from them, are the creation of white racism is not to make an overheated charge. It is to cite the historical record.
It's hard to take black people seriously anymore.
He was hounded by Zimmerman because he was a Black who dared to be walking through his neighborhood at night. Typical sunset rule violation. And, it cost him his life.
Rule of thumb: Never go against the status quo here.
Blacks who are legitimate victims must have done something to be victims.
In my other thread about the slain athlete folks responded:
"He shouldn't have knocked on her door in that hour"
"He shouldn't have ran towards the cops"
As for Trayvon the sad part out of all this is conservatives focus on him being a supposed thug rather than a 17 year old human being who was killed by a wannabe cop.
link? I never saw anyone say that the dude should not have knocked on her door.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?