Wow dear lord banning lunch from home...liberals gone wild
Do you think the rule would stand if challenged?
So when the little heavy set boy or girl walks into the lunch room and pours out 6 candy bars and 2 sugary soft drinks from their lunchbox, you think that is ok.
Should we allow these little kids to have cigarettes after their lunch too. After all why should the "government" be allowed to take away their smoking rights.
Second person I get to ask:
Do I now get to choose one person as representative of conservatives? Because this is just one principal making this decision.
I get to pick anyone I want. You get to pick this individual. Deal?
I sure do, because the last time I checked, we still live in America, not the Soviet Union, or China.
"Liberty", isn't selective, based on the whims of the government's agenda.
This is true. People do things that they shouldn't all the time.The sad - and most infuriating thing - is that it shouldn't even be there to need challenging in the first place.
I don't think it's reason to call our entire moderns society into question just because one lady made up some poorly thought-out rule.We are in worse shape (no pun intended) than we ever imagined as far as an over-reaching govt.
School's food is the only option for some kids - chicagotribune.com
Really, school lunches? they know better than you or I what we should feed our children? I think this is far out of bounds.
Any school that bans homemade lunches also puts more money in the pockets of the district’s food provider, Chartwells-Thompson. The federal government pays the district for each free or reduced-price lunch taken, and the caterer receives a set fee from the district per lunch.
As far as I can see, the issue is about health and nothing more, But some would rather make it out to be some sort of constitutional rights issue.
Why don't you start sending your own learning materials with your kids if you don't trust the school to make the right decisions.
Isn't it funny that we would allow the government to feed their minds, yet people want to riot in the streets if the government has a say in what goes into their stomachs.
This is true. People do things that they shouldn't all the time.
I don't think it's reason to call our entire moderns society into question just because one lady made up some poorly thought-out rule.
You wanted the government to call all the shots. Well, you got it.
As far as I can see, the issue is about health and nothing more, But some would rather make it out to be some sort of constitutional rights issue.
Why don't you start sending your own learning materials with your kids if you don't trust the school to make the right decisions.
Isn't it sad that we would allow the government to feed their minds, yet people want to riot in the streets if the government has a say in what goes into their stomachs.
So when the little heavy set boy or girl walks into the lunch room and pours out 6 candy bars and 2 sugary soft drinks from their lunchbox, you think that is ok.
I always find it fascinating that the same libs who come up with these screwy and intrusive things are the first to declare the sanctity of personal choice and one's freedom over their own body when it comes to abortion but somehow that rule doesn't apply to other situations that involve personal choice and/or personal autonomy.
It would not surprise me that this is in someone's contract....guaranteeing X-number of meals.
As usual, folks, follow the money. It usually provides the answers.
Bingo! You have hit the nail square on the head.
I will always remember how the govt. food pyramid used to dictate 8 glasses of milk a day. Turns out it was a direct hand up to the dairy industry.
Must've been really old.Bingo! You have hit the nail square on the head.
I will always remember how the govt. food pyramid used to dictate 8 glasses of milk a day. Turns out it was a direct hand up to the dairy industry.
Well, for one, it didn't "dictate" anything.
Next, it never recommended 8 glasses of milk a day.
You eat dinosaurs?we eat about 80% paleo, it woudln't fly if the goverment dictated what I eat.
The Soviet Union Nor China would ban bring-to-school lunches.
You don't know that. "That", being whatever your incoherent sentence implies.
The Soviet Union Nor China would ban bring-to-school lunches.
Or it's more plausible you believe theyd rather have their students hungry by government decree.
Save the capitalization of the word 'nor' the sentence is fine. Sorry you have trouble reading it.
Frankly, I never saw kids in China bringing lunches to school from home... just saying
But...but...you're like...from there. What the hell could you possibly know?!? :rofl
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?