- Joined
- Apr 13, 2011
- Messages
- 34,951
- Reaction score
- 16,311
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Socialist
From reddit post: LiveLeak.com - Checkpoint No Consent, Warrantless Vehicle Search, Right to
http://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/co...
Video @: Checkpoint No Consent, Warrantless Vehicle Search, Right to - YouTube
Man refuses to roll down his window to a checkpoint. He continues to take pictures, as the sheriff comes over they motion him to go to a secondary area and they bash his window in while he is in his car. Is this a bit excessive and goes against our rights? I think so. No warrant was presented.
Video @: Checkpoint No Consent, Warrantless Vehicle Search, Right to - YouTube
Man refuses to roll down his window to a checkpoint. He continues to take pictures, as the sheriff comes over they motion him to go to a secondary area and they bash his window in while he is in his car. Is this a bit excessive and goes against our rights? I think so. No warrant was presented.
Video @: Checkpoint No Consent, Warrantless Vehicle Search, Right to - YouTube
Man refuses to roll down his window to a checkpoint. He continues to take pictures, as the sheriff comes over they motion him to go to a secondary area and they bash his window in while he is in his car. Is this a bit excessive and goes against our rights? I think so. No warrant was presented.
If checkpoints are legal in that state, then I have no problem with what they did. He wouldn't even talk to them. If a copper gives you a lawful order, you obey. Period.
He was making some sort of test case of himself. It probably cost him a couple hundred dollars. Stupid. Serves him right.
Video @: Checkpoint No Consent, Warrantless Vehicle Search, Right to - YouTube
Man refuses to roll down his window to a checkpoint. He continues to take pictures, as the sheriff comes over they motion him to go to a secondary area and they bash his window in while he is in his car. Is this a bit excessive and goes against our rights? I think so. No warrant was presented.
This is a perfect example of my "more liberal taser use" position. People should get tased for asking stupid questions.
A couple hundred bucks? It will be more than that, he's gonna get all sorts of charges and need a lawyer, and blah blah blah. This whole thing is designed to siphon money away from the People.
A couple hundred bucks? It will be more than that, he's gonna get all sorts of charges and need a lawyer, and blah blah blah. This whole thing is designed to siphon money away from the People.
Man, you'd be tazed non-stop.
hahahah
This is a perfect example of my "more liberal taser use" position. People should get tased for asking stupid questions.
I support tasing people for supporting checkpoints.
Warrants aren't always needed for a search, or for a stop.
This guy was an ass hole who was looking for trouble. He should have rolled down his window, at least partially.
No, the whole thing is designed to handle stupid idiots. Didn't realize he had charges; should've known that. Maybe he learned a lesson.
Does that post make any sense?
Anyway, after they broke the window they should tased the **** outta 'm.
If checkpoints are legal in that state, then I have no problem with what they did. He wouldn't even talk to them. If a copper gives you a lawful order, you obey. Period.
If checkpoints are legal in that state, then I have no problem with what they did. He wouldn't even talk to them. If a copper gives you a lawful order, you obey. Period.
He was making some sort of test case of himself. It probably cost him a couple hundred dollars. Stupid. Serves him right.
Thats what this guy's actions were..... A ploy to siphon money away from the people by trying his damnedest to create a situation where he could try to sue someone.
Dumb ass...... You can't tell me his actions served any legitimate purpose whatsoever.
What lawful order? He refused a search, which is WELL within his rights. I hope you're not one of those "do whatever the police tell you" types who opposes people citing their rights.
If he wasn't being detained he should be free to go. What PC did they have to detain him in secondary inspection? From his story (and yes of course if he is full of it it'll come out in court) they had none.
I really hate these bull**** "interior" border patrol checkpoints. They can occur far from any border and treat the coasts as our borders too:
View attachment 67150136
Of course it does. You said people should be tazed for stupid comments, I just mentioned that if stupid comments are the limitation, you'd be tazed constantly. Follow now? It was pretty funny.
When does the State ever have to learn their lesson? Seems to me that it's always the individual who has to learn the lesson of Government Domination.
I wrote 'stupid questions'.
So you are saying that Border Patrol shouldn't use a USSC approved method (checkpoint) to attempt to do what a large percentage of the American population (The People) have employed them to do (because Border security is their job)???
What lesson is there to be learned from this?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?