It seems that what you were looking for is "We have lovely national forests and our apple pie is to die for."Yes...because my intent is clear, but people were trying to weasel out of it. I'm like a genuine positive comments about the U.S. that doesn't have negatives attached to it. And this doesn't mean that there aren't problems, there is no place that has no problems. That doesn't mean one can't be proud or positive about some aspects or accomplishments of their country.
All I see from liberals and progressives, day in and day out, is extreme criticism. Nothing positive, ever. It's gotten to the point where there is even a NYT article saying that the American flag is divisive now. There has to be something to unite over.
Right, we should unite behind this?Yes...because my intent is clear, but people were trying to weasel out of it. I'm like a genuine positive comments about the U.S. that doesn't have negatives attached to it. And this doesn't mean that there aren't problems, there is no place that has no problems. That doesn't mean one can't be proud or positive about some aspects or accomplishments of their country.
All I see from liberals and progressives, day in and day out, is extreme criticism. Nothing positive, ever. It's gotten to the point where there is even a NYT article saying that the American flag is divisive now. There has to be something to unite over.
Again, just the same coded insult based in partisanship rehashed from your previous comment.A nation's democratic institutions saved itself from fascism. Sorry that you think so low of the U.S. that you don't see this as an amazing thing. Name me for one other country that managed to use democratic institutions to stop its descent into fascism. And while I'm not a historian, I'm not sure there is one.
All of those things you wrote, without adding "so and so terrible people would be offended by this" stand on their own. Thanks for you contributions.It seems that what you were looking for is "We have lovely national forests and our apple pie is to die for."
The problem with your request is that, "lovely national forests" aside, we're a nation that is always on a journey of betterment. The journey of improvement is marked by the negative reality we climbed out of. We established our independence to rid ourselves of monarchy (a monarchist would be offended by this). Slaves were freed (a southern confederate would be offended by this). Women gained the right to vote (a misogynist would be offended by this). African Americans gained (in part) their civil liberties (a racist would be offended by this). And we saved ourselves from fascism using democratic institutions (you are offended by me saying this).
You're annoyed because mentioning the negative thing we overcame offends you. And that's not my problem; that's yours.
Where the **** did I say that?Right, we should unite behind this?
View attachment 67341409
To a person against women's right to vote, praising women's suffrage is a "coded insult." If I want to praise women's suffrage, I have no obligations to avoid making that praise in order to consider the feelings of that person. You're just on the wrong side of an important issue, and that's your problem; not mine.All of those things you wrote, without adding "so and so terrible people would be offended by this" stand on their own. Thanks for you contributions.
The point is still going over you head. All of those things you could've said straight up, without mentioning anything else.To a person against women's right to vote, praising women's suffrage is a "coded insult." If I want to praise women's suffrage, I have no obligations to avoid making that praise in order to consider the feelings of that person. You're just on the wrong side of an important issue, and that's your problem; not mine.
To somebody on the right side of an issue, praising our democratic institutions for saving us from fascism isn't a coded insult but, as you put it, a thing that stands on its own.
No, I do not. I didn't say anything that would imply that, either. Think more carefully. Given what I said, do you think I believe that unbridled and complete honesty is an unadulterated good in all situations? No, obviously I do not (and just as obviously, it is not). Do I know that there are things about my family that are evil? Yes, I do know that--there's something evil about all families. The very concept has a certain evil to it. Of course, it has good as well--and usually, families are more good than evil.Ah....so if you have a wife or family and you complement them you also throw in a couple of negatives because nothing can be talked about singularly in a positive manner. Weird.
You can't think of anything modern? My caveat is that it has to be a proven fact.The point is still going over you head. All of those things you could've said straight up, without mentioning anything else.
-we're a nation that is always on a journey of betterment
-We established our independence to rid ourselves of monarchy
-Slaves were freed
-Women gained the right to vote
-African Americans gained (in part) their civil liberties
Boom! Done. Fact is, you really only wanted to call Trump a fascist and, by proxy, anyone who supported him. That was your intent. You then generated a whole list of things to try and obfuscate and link other things to your original comment, just to insult more. You're so transparent.
Those weren't things I wrote, those were quoted from the person I was responding to. Care to try again?You can't think of anything modern? My caveat is that it has to be a proven fact.
Yet you do it, none-the-less. Now how about you try your hand at it with regard to the OP, or don't.No, I do not. I didn't say anything that would imply that, either. Think more carefully. Given what I said, do you think I believe that unbridled and complete honesty is an unadulterated good in all situations? No, obviously not. Do I know that there are things about my family that are evil? Yes, I do know that--there's something evil about all families. The very concept has a certain evil to it. Of course, it has good as well--and usually, families are more good than evil. But that's the point--if you're being completely honest, there is nothing that is wholly and thoroughgoingly good.
You should put quotes in quotations. Care to try again?Those weren't things I wrote, those were quoted from the person I was responding to. Care to try again?
I'm posting this challenge for anyone who identifies as a liberal/progressive to post something positive about the United States of America, and to do so without equivocations or disclaimers.
The point is still going over you head. All of those things you could've said straight up, without mentioning anything else.
-we're a nation that is always on a journey of betterment
-We established our independence to rid ourselves of monarchy
-Slaves were freed
-Women gained the right to vote
-African Americans gained (in part) their civil liberties
Boom! Done. Fact is, you really only wanted to call Trump a fascist and, by proxy, anyone who supported him. That was your intent. You then generated a whole list of things to try and obfuscate and link other things to your original comment, just to insult more. You're so transparent.
Do you have something personally you want to say? Remember, it's caveated with not making a backhanding insult about Trump, which is basically what your article is. Ya'll do understand that the United States didn't pop into existence in 2016, right?American Pride Ticks Up From Last Year's Record Low
After reaching new lows last year, the percentages of U.S. adults who are extremely or very proud to be Americans have recovered somewhat, mostly because of increases among Democrats.news.gallup.com
You butted into a conversation with someone else, without informing yourself of the context. That's your fault, not mine. Try again, but actually answer the OP.You should put quotes in quotations. Care to try again?
Wrong. It means that we've seen constant improvement.I like examples. "We're on a journey of betterment" without specifics is no better than "Imagine world peace." Looks fine on a bumper sticker, but not good for much else.
Nope...none of those comments did that. In fact, I didn't mention those groups at all. I know this is super hard for you.Uh oh, you just made a coded insult against monarchists.
Uh oh, you just made a coded insult against Southern Confederates.
Uh oh, you just made a coded insult against misogynists.
Uh oh, you just made a coded insult against racists.
Two different situations. My wife never asks me to tell her something about herself that is good without qualification. You're asking for something that isn't possible.Yet you do it, none-the-less. Now how about you try your hand at it with regard to the OP, or don't.
The monarchist, the misogynist, the Southern Confederate and the racist would have no problem seeing the "coded insult," just as you saw a coded insult when I praised the United States for using democratic institutions to reverse fascism. It says far more about the offended party than the speaker.Wrong. It means that we've seen constant improvement.
Nope...none of those comments did that. In fact, I didn't mention those groups at all. I know this is super hard for you.
You don't get to choose which comments I respond to, you don't know how to use the quote function, I did answer the OP and "your" thread has too many foolish rules.You butted into a conversation with someone else, without informing yourself of the context. That's your fault, not mine. Try again, but actually answer the OP.
Sure, but that implies we aren't perfect...which just proves my point. Further, are we really doing the very best we can do? I doubt it.-we're a nation that is always on a journey of betterment
This could only be an unadulterated good if there were nothing evil in our history...but of course, there is.-We established our independence to rid ourselves of monarchy
Sure. How many were not freed (e.g. died before emancipation)? Here, you're talking about justice finally delivered after a long injustice--but justice is never an unadulterated good. Ask the family of a murder victim which they would rather--to have their loved one back so that no trial or investigation were ever necessary, or to see the murderer caught and punished appropriately? I suspect nearly 100% would opt for the former; and (crucially) anyone can recognize that the former is much more good than the latter. We do the latter only because it's the best we can do in this world...which is again exactly my point. We can only ever manifest a partial good.-Slaves were freed
See above re: slavery, and make the appropriate substitutions here. Furthermore, are there unwise women who exercise their franchise unwisely? Surely there are, just as there are unwise men who do the same--hard to figure out how you could call an unwise person with power a good thing.-Women gained the right to vote
See above re: slavery and women's franchise.-African Americans gained (in part) their civil liberties
Now, aren't all of the above preferable to the alternative? Absolutely! If there are slaves, we should free them. If women may not vote, we should ensure that they may. If members of a race are not equal before the law, we should ensure that they become so. But preferable and wholly good are not the same thing.Boom! Done. Fact is, you really only wanted to call Trump a fascist and, by proxy, anyone who supported him. That was your intent. You then generated a whole list of things to try and obfuscate and link other things to your original comment, just to insult more. You're so transparent.
The US has provided great gifts to the world: a modern form of representative democracy, plus our singular contributions of jazz and rock and roll.I'm posting this challenge for anyone who identifies as a liberal/progressive to post something positive about the United States of America, and to do so without equivocations or disclaimers.
Yes, you're free to make idiotic responses due to you butting into a conversasion that you didn't bother to obtain the context for. Fire away.You don't get to choose which comments I respond to, you don't know how to use the quote function, I did answer the OP and "your" thread has too many foolish rules.
No, you didn't, and I addressed that. If you can't answer the question then I agree that it's best for you to "be out" of the thread.I'm out. Have a great day!
It's actually quite easily met. Many have done it already.Two different situations. My wife never asks me to tell her something about herself that is good without qualification. You're asking for something that isn't possible.
Do I think there's good about this country? You bet! It's full of lots of good people--most people at all points of the political spectrum are generally good people (just not perfectly good, and of course there are bad people too). We try to do good things in the world (we screw it up pretty often, though). People are significantly free--more than in most other countries and certainly more than has historically been the case in most parts of the world (but we've still got a lot of room for improvement, especially where power interacts with freedom). There are lots of public libraries (but knowledge is a double-edged sword). We have fantastic wealth (that should probably be distributed in more egalitarian fashion). There are lots and lots of lovely trees (some of which are dying due to environmental destruction and climate change).
You didn't ask us to simply pay America a compliment. You provided a more complicated challenge--one that, again, cannot be met.
It's best for me to be out of the thread? HAHAHA.Yes, you're free to make idiotic responses due to you butting into a conversasion that you didn't bother to obtain the context for. Fire away.
No, you didn't, and I addressed that. If you can't answer the question then I agree that it's best for you to "be out" of the thread.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?