- Joined
- Jan 28, 2013
- Messages
- 94,823
- Reaction score
- 28,342
- Location
- Williamsburg, Virginia
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Please point out my agreement.
And yet you agreed with a post that claimed the woman wanted an abortion
Lie much?
I agree she did not go to the hospital for an abortion and I have made no claim why she is suing now.eace
Lucid as usual. Good afternoon, CJ. :2wave:
According to one of the articles posted by AGENT J the hospital gave her meds to stop the labor pains.
They never should have done that.
Her body was trying to expel the fetus.
If they really did give her meds to stop the contractions ( her body was trying the rid itself of the fetus before an infection set in )
then they are responsible for putting her life at risk.
Please point out my agreement.
You agreed that she was suing because the hospital would not perform an abortion
Asked and answered
And where in my post do you find this agreement?
In the words you posted
Ah. Your poor English betrays you again. The word "lucid" conveys nothing about meaning or substance, but rather deals with clarity of expression. It expresses neither agreement nor disagreement.eace
It's not my fault you don't even understand what your own words mean.
lucid means cogent.
Yes, cogent works. Still has nothing to do with agreement or disagreement.
cogent means "clear, logical, and convincing"
Yes, cogent can mean those things, but it need not mean them all in any one case, and as a meaning for "lucid" it does not. Moreover, even if an argument is convincingly made, granting that compliment still does not convey agreement.
That's not why the woman is suing. Please stop telling such obvious lies.
And yet you agreed with a post that claimed the woman wanted an abortion
Lie much?
Practitioners and institutions can have their values and no one should take that away from them, ...
Tamesha Means lawsuit: Catholic hospital 'forced miscarrying woman to deliver 18-week fetus' | Mail Online
[h=1]Catholic hospital 'risked woman's life by forcing her to deliver 18-week fetus that had no chance of survival' because of no abortion policy.[/h]
- Tamesha Means, 30, of Muskegon, Michigan, filed a lawsuit Friday against the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops
- It claims Means, then 27 and a mother-of-two, visited the hospital - the only one in her county - three times after her water broke five months early
- She says she was told to go home before she miscarried on the third visit and was forced to deliver the 18 week fetus feet-first
Shades of the debacle in Ireland where the woman died.
I don't know why people are all flustered about the possible imposition of sharia law when there is a christian version just as bad and already in place.
The American Civil Liberties Union and the ACLU of Michigan have filed a lawsuit on behalf of a pregnant woman who miscarried and was denied appropriate medical treatment because the only hospital in her county is required to abide by religious directives. The directives, written by the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, prohibited that hospital from complying with the applicable standard of care in this case.
From the OP - Catholic hospital 'risked woman's life by forcing her to deliver 18-week fetus that had no chance of survival' because of no abortion policy.
Now, tell us again who's telling obvious lies and who has a hard time believing the facts.
Just because you crank it out, doesn't make it true.
A Michigan woman is suing the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, claiming doctors at a Catholic-run hospital failed to provide appropriate care during her miscarriage
Read more: Michigan woman sues Catholic health officials, claiming hospital failed to properly treat miscarriage - NY Daily News
No one said she went to the hospital for the purpose of getting an abortion but that doesn't change the fact that the woman is suing the hospital because of their no abortion policy supposedly putting her life at risk.
Are your posts dense much?
A Michigan woman is suing the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, claiming doctors at a Catholic-run hospital failed to provide appropriate care during her miscarriage
Read more: Michigan woman sues Catholic health officials, claiming hospital failed to properly treat miscarriage* - NY Daily News
You got caught agreeing with something you knew was a lie. Now, after agreeing that lucid means cogent, you're dishonestly claiming that lucid does not mean cogent, and that the lie was convincing even though it didn't convince you. :roll:
Keep trying, but the plain meaning of English is against you.
You have been reduced to repeating "nuh-uh"
You're dismissed
Indeed. I find it difficult to debate someone who disputes the plain meaning of words.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?