• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Can you defend Trump without mentioning Hillary?

Can You Defend Trump Without Mentioning Hillary?


  • Total voters
    38
there are only so many dummies who parrot fox news and breitbart. most news reporters are educated.

I would suspect I am better educated than almost any news reporter. So what is your point? The leftwing is made up of well educated elites who crave power and use government to gain wealth. another part of the movement are the libertines whose support of the left is mainly due the libertines hatred of the religious right. and most of the rest are those who want more government giving them more stuff. Some of those are well educated people who depend on public grants and tax dollars-like university professors and the teachers' unions. But many are the dependent sheeple who never quite make it to real adulthood and want a nanny government to take care of them
 
when you say "lamestream media" you appear to be intellectual equal of sarah palin

No. He is actually being extremely kind.

The MSM are immoral, spineless, leftist press prostitutes except that the real prostitutes are more honest, more patriotic and, generally, command more respect.
 
I would suspect I am better educated than almost any news reporter. So what is your point? The leftwing is made up of well educated elites who crave power and use government to gain wealth. another part of the movement are the libertines whose support of the left is mainly due the libertines hatred of the religious right. and most of the rest are those who want more government giving them more stuff. Some of those are well educated people who depend on public grants and tax dollars-like university professors and the teachers' unions. But many are the dependent sheeple who never quite make it to real adulthood and want a nanny government to take care of them

My education ends at trade apprenticeship and I'm as liberal as all get-out so what's your point? I learned liberalism from my father who went to sea with a grade 9 education so what's your point?
See what I mean?
I'll trade your 'nanny state' liberals for 'daddy state' conservatives- conservatives who espouse liberal values of personal rights and freedoms and no government interference but when the rubber meets the road advocate for more government power, more police power, more laws and restrictions. The government is a stern-but-fair daddy to them, the stronger the better, demanding obedience.
 
My education ends at trade apprenticeship and I'm as liberal as all get-out so what's your point? I learned liberalism from my father who went to sea with a grade 9 education so what's your point?
See what I mean?
I'll trade your 'nanny state' liberals for 'daddy state' conservatives- conservatives who espouse liberal values of personal rights and freedoms and no government interference but when the rubber meets the road advocate for more government power, more police power, more laws and restrictions. The government is a stern-but-fair daddy to them, the stronger the better, demanding obedience.

I really don't care about Canadian government when we are talking about US elections.

I don't know what you are talking about either. I don't like government pretending to be my parent-father or mother. I grew up long time ago
 
not in Journalism.

journalism isn't exactly a field that is information intensive. and on many issues reporters report on-anyone with an analytical mind can do as well or better than they can.
 
journalism isn't exactly a field that is information intensive. and on many issues reporters report on-anyone with an analytical mind can do as well or better than they can.

so it's just a big conspiracy. they call each other and get their talking points. LOL
 
I would suspect I am better educated than almost any news reporter. So what is your point? The leftwing is made up of well educated elites who crave power and use government to gain wealth. another part of the movement are the libertines whose support of the left is mainly due the libertines hatred of the religious right. and most of the rest are those who want more government giving them more stuff. Some of those are well educated people who depend on public grants and tax dollars-like university professors and the teachers' unions. But many are the dependent sheeple who never quite make it to real adulthood and want a nanny government to take care of them

Man, you are on the roll today. I was going to post the same thing.

Let me just add that those scientists who oppose the idea are very sorry very quickly when their grants are not renewed.

That is how the left makes otherwise very smart people toe the line.
 
Aw are you sad you can't defend him without mentioning three other candidates??

Okay then...you won't answer a simple question. I'm not surprised.

I judge this thread to be nothing more than a troll thread.

Tschuss, dude.
 
so it's just a big conspiracy. they call each other and get their talking points. LOL

nope, birds of a feather flock together. Its an echo chamber among the urban liberal elite who tend to include the MSM.
 
nope, birds of a feather flock together. Its an echo chamber among the urban liberal elite who tend to include the MSM.

now you sound like fox and friends and sarah palin again.
 
now you sound like fox and friends and sarah palin again.

you seem really clued into what fox and friends and or Sarah Palin sound like

you a fan of theirs?
 
so it's just a big conspiracy. they call each other and get their talking points. LOL

That sophomoric view of conspiracies does not make you look very smart.

The boot lickers know from experience how to survive without calling anyone. Darwin at his best.
 
That sophomoric view of conspiracies does not make you look very smart.

The boot lickers know from experience how to survive without calling anyone. Darwin at his best.


I don't think you are correct. the left wing echo chamber thrives on hearing their same views repeated over and over. The thought of left wingers actually acting independently and alone is hard to believe.
 
you seem really clued into what fox and friends and or Sarah Palin sound like

you a fan of theirs?

i don't live in an echo chamber I listen to all kinds of media.

I also read a lot. Makes me proficient in may disciplines.
 
i don't live in an echo chamber I listen to all kinds of media.

I also read a lot. Makes me proficient in may disciplines.


That's good, I do too. I like to know what the forces of collectivism and socialism are up to!
 
I really don't care about Canadian government when we are talking about US elections.

I don't know what you are talking about either. I don't like government pretending to be my parent-father or mother. I grew up long time ago

We're talking about liberal-conservative, not Canadian-American. And you do know what I'm talking about. Unless you honestly believe that your blanket slur of liberals with nanny-state references is true and my blanket slur of conservatives and daddy-state worship is false. Is that it? When I echo your partisan hacking you don't know what I'm talking about?
 
The entire point of "defending Trump" has to do with what Trump is part of --- the election. So....defending Trump against what or who? Hillary. The two go hand-in-hand. It's silly to ask someone to defend their own candidate without mentioning the other candidate's name.

Without mentioning Hillary? No. But that is who he is running against.

Let's try it another way: if you can't make a good case for Trump as an effective President, then he probably would not be. The case for Trump as an effective President should NOT require the need to mention Hillary.
 
We're talking about liberal-conservative, not Canadian-American. And you do know what I'm talking about. Unless you honestly believe that your blanket slur of liberals with nanny-state references is true and my blanket slur of conservatives and daddy-state worship is false. Is that it? When I echo your partisan hacking you don't know what I'm talking about?


NOt all liberals need or want the government taking care of them. Some want to be the parents in this relationship The power hungry ones or those who think they are smarter than everyone else. and of course there is the libertine segment who hate the religious right and detest often uneducated "faithful" calling them sinners. That tends to make up many of the people I went to college with who are voting Hillary.
 
Let's try it another way: if you can't make a good case for Trump as an effective President, then he probably would not be. The case for Trump as an effective President should NOT require the need to mention Hillary.

There's not a good case for either person to be an effective President.
 
Let's try it another way: if you can't make a good case for Trump as an effective President, then he probably would not be. The case for Trump as an effective President should NOT require the need to mention Hillary.

Less taxes
no more gun restrictions
Judges who respect the second amendment
less uncontrolled immigration
not being worried about "rent a riots" like BLM and other quasi-criminal support groups
more respect for our military

There you go
 
That's good, I do too. I like to know what the forces of collectivism and socialism are up to!

leave the military industrial complex, ag subsidies and tax loopholes for corporations OUT of this.
 
There's not a good case for either person to be an effective President.

probably true so we look at the policies

as I have noted, A gop majority in the two houses will be a check on EITHER

a Democrat majority in both houses will be a check on Trump but will let Hillary do just about anything she wants

which is another good reason to support Trump even if you don't like him.
 
leave the military industrial complex, ag subsidies and tax loopholes for corporations OUT of this.

so you think Hillary is actually going to piss off wall street given how much money they gave her? If you really don't like corporations, you should have voted for nutty Bernie. Hillary is as big or bigger corporate whore than Trump. I think most of the Fat Cat CEOs are lining up behind Hillary
 
Back
Top Bottom