- Joined
- May 22, 2012
- Messages
- 118,303
- Reaction score
- 83,562
- Location
- Uhland, Texas
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian
No, I believe that we (the United States) are a family and families worked together for the benefit of everyone in the familyl even though some in the family are not able to do their own share of the economic duties. Everyone in a family participates in the well-being of the family but it may not be on an economic basis.
This idea that I have has been proven successful in many places such as New Zealand, Norway, Finland, Denmark and other places where the wealth is shared overall with those capable of more getting more but not to the detriment of the ones that are achieving less. A place where happiness, well being, health and other issues are as important as the economics of it.
I am not "demanding" a greater share of someone else's paycheck. What I am demanding is that people fulfill their responsabilities of being a member of a family. If you are not willing to do that, then go and buy an island of your own and do all you want.
In this family, you are enjoying the benefit of laws, buildings, roads, services, assistance when ill and sick, and of people that will do what they can for you when you are in need. You need to do the same.
Any US ctity, county or state is free to do (or at least try) that 'extended family' sysem yet, for some reason, none have elected to do so. Might the reason be that folks subjected to the addition of added 'family members' to support that just don't see the need to work to support themselves is not as appealing as you make it out to be?