- Joined
- Oct 18, 2007
- Messages
- 32,061
- Reaction score
- 21,046
- Location
- East Coast - USA
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Centrist
the only relevant factor is whether they're causing a disruption or not.
We agree.
The point is, some people appear to want to claim that vocalized praying can't ever be a disruption.
Some people want to claim that preventing vocalized praying in any given situation is a violation of rights.
My question was simply asking if there was any actual difference between thinking a prayer, and speaking a prayer.
It appears unanimous that a thought prayer is just as effective as a spoken one.
So the idea that rights are being infringed simply because, in some very specific situations, a spoken prayer isn't "allowed" appears to be preposterous.
I was looking for confirmation and information.