- Joined
- Nov 11, 2011
- Messages
- 12,895
- Reaction score
- 2,909
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Slightly Conservative
Forgive my polemics for a moment, but I can't help it:
What exactly are legitimate "issues" Nazis "bring to the table"? That immigrants shall be gassed to death? That democracy shall be abolished? Look, you're apologizing for genuine hardcore ultra-Nazis here, probably just because they have a beef with Muslims, right?
Forgive my polemics for a moment, but I can't help it:
What exactly are legitimate "issues" Nazis "bring to the table"? That immigrants shall be gassed to death? That democracy shall be abolished? Look, you're apologizing for genuine hardcore ultra-Nazis here, probably just because they have a beef with Muslims, right?
They *have* no legitimate issues on the table whatsoever. They are freedom-hating, pre-enlightenment advocates of totalitarianism. They deserve to be reeducated by force, if necessary, and when that's not possible, either be thrown into prison because they are severe threat for everybody else. America regularly even bombs such people.
That didn't happen with the Nazi "German Reich Party" which was banned in West-Germany in 1953, and neither with the communist KPD which was banned in 1956. Both bans were successful, and neo-Nazis were basically nonexistant until 1990, when they got a moderate foothold in the east. And real commies are still virtually non-existant.
Well, as I said, it was not ineffectual at all in West-Germany.
And yes, of course the underlying issues shall be addressed (and problems with immigrants are a *symptom*, not the underlying issue, since they're mere scapegoats), but hey, why not burn the candle on both sides?
If they match the criteria I stated above, yes, absolutely.
the issues facing a society are not the same as a political organizations solution
example: pressures due to unchecked immigration would be an issue. The golden dawn's solution to this would be their policy towards immigrants. You can recognize the former without supporting the later
As far as solutions are concerned, I also think many people confuse notions as to how best to deal with these loathsome people with some sort of tacit support. Seems to me that the best way to deal with them is to take away any possible appeal they might have, and in order to do that, the subject of immigration needs to dealt with in a candid and pragmatic way that actually addresses the concerns of those who might be tempted to support them otherwise.
The horrific economic situation was not caused by immigration, it was caused by catastrophic mismanagement over a number of decades and endemic political corruption.
There is no evidence that the golden dawn ordered the execution of the rapper, and no, their lives are meaningless. Ofc, as I said before, not to the state. The law is the law and all are equal in front of it. But from the point of view of society, the death or a rapper is 99.9% of the times a blessing since a source stupidity and ignorance dies. And making allowances for the 0.1% is not worth the time of day. Dead people are better people than communists or rappers.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?