• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Busted; Why The Numbers Behind Mitch McConnell's Reelection Don't Add Up

calamity said:
Can they even read beyond, you know, the third grade level?
Click to expand...
That's a ridiculous and juvenile comment! That's the kind of game grade school children play, speaking of "third grade".
 
gbg3 said:
This thread is music to my ears!!!!!!! Let this country find out who really won every race from one coast to the other. Let's dig deep and quit saying "nothing there" to all these questions!
Click to expand...
Amen.
 
Hamish Howl said:
I don't mind digging. You think McConnell's okay with it?

Gonna need lots of recounts.
Click to expand...
yeah, she’s only 600k behind. Maybe she can get some vote counters from Pennsylvania to help out.
 
Bullseye said:
yeah, she’s only 600k behind. Maybe she can get some vote counters from Pennsylvania to help out.
Click to expand...

I'm just saying we should look into it. For months and months.
 
Common Sense 1 said:
This is why McGrath lost the Senate race in Kentucky! :sneaky:(y)(y)

Just 'How Bad Was Amy McGrath's #KYSen Campaign Rollout This Week?'


It was so bad, she skipped a scheduled appearance on MSNBC.
On Sunday night, NRSC Communications Director Jesse Hunt tweeted, “How bad was Amy McGrath’s #KYSen rollout this week? She announced her run on MSNBC this past Monday and she now appears to have pulled out of her Sunday night MSNBC hit.”

Things Are Not Going Well for Amy McGrath

Amy McGrath’s campaign launch was so disastrous that she might have gotten herself a serious primary challenger
www.washingtonexaminer.com

Amy McGrath’s campaign launch was so disastrous that she might have gotten herself a serious primary challenger - Washington Examiner

It has gone from bad to worse for Democratic Kentucky Senate candidate Amy McGrath.“Kentucky Sports Radio host Matt Jones is losing his television show until the outspoken media personality makes a decision on running for U.S. Senate in 2020,” the Louisville Courier-Journal reported this week...
www.washingtonexaminer.com www.washingtonexaminer.com
Click to expand...


Too loud to hear.
 
PirateMk1 said:
Not only possible it is very probable.
Click to expand...
to what extent? Yes there are cases of Trump supporters committing election fraud. these 3 had no outcome on the actual results. To commit the type of fraud you seem to think there was would take multiple people and would have to be coordinated in such a complex way that. logic says it was not possible,

And then there were the end results. Do you really think the people smart enough to pull off this type of fraud would have let McConnell keep hi job? think about it. does that make any sense logically to you?
Do you think they wood have allowed the Dems to lose house seats? Why are those votes not fraudulent in your opinion?
 
Mycroft said:
I think for myself. I've never been a herd beast.
Does that chap your ass?
Click to expand...

Is your intention to do something with my ass?

Why would w/e you're doing in the world be related to my ass?

Is there something you would like to tell us about my ass?
 
SCrider said:
to what extent? Yes there are cases of Trump supporters committing election fraud. these 3 had no outcome on the actual results. To commit the type of fraud you seem to think there was would take multiple people and would have to be coordinated in such a complex way that. logic says it was not possible,

And then there were the end results. Do you really think the people smart enough to pull off this type of fraud would have let McConnell keep hi job? think about it. does that make any sense logically to you?
Do you think they wood have allowed the Dems to lose house seats? Why are those votes not fraudulent in your opinion?
Click to expand...

I want a full and complete audit. All elections everywhere.
 
Mycroft said:
I think for myself. I've never been a herd beast.

Does that chap your ass?
Click to expand...
Yet you somehow always arrive at precisely the same conclusion conservative media is selling each and every day. Chapter and verse.

Looks more like you're a herder, to me.
 
PirateMk1 said:
I want a full and complete audit. All elections everywhere.
Click to expand...

In other words, Allow DJT to stay in the White House until this "full and complete audit" of every election undertaken on 3 Nov 2020. Oh yeah, that would keep Nancy's majority in the House. It would also mean that all of Trump's "acting" appointees would continue to run their departments in ways that are often not too beneficial for Americans.

"All elections everywhere." just might cause a bit of turmoil in the nation but - HEY! We gotta be sure that Donnie wasn't cheated on, nevermind state legislatures, governors, mayors, town councils, judges etc etc will have no idea as to how stuff is supposed to run without positive statements on just who is to control government(s) and courts.
 
Somerville said:
In other words, Allow DJT to stay in the White House until this "full and complete audit" of every election undertaken on 3 Nov 2020. Oh yeah, that would keep Nancy's majority in the House. It would also mean that all of Trump's "acting" appointees would continue to run their departments in ways that are often not too beneficial for Americans.

"All elections everywhere." just might cause a bit of turmoil in the nation but - HEY! We gotta be sure that Donnie wasn't cheated on, nevermind state legislatures, governors, mayors, town councils, judges etc etc will have no idea as to how stuff is supposed to run without positive statements on just who is to control government(s) and courts.
Click to expand...

Please quote were I said that. I want a full and complete audit of the election. Period.
 
SCrider said:
to what extent? Yes there are cases of Trump supporters committing election fraud. these 3 had no outcome on the actual results. To commit the type of fraud you seem to think there was would take multiple people and would have to be coordinated in such a complex way that. logic says it was not possible,

And then there were the end results. Do you really think the people smart enough to pull off this type of fraud would have let McConnell keep hi job? think about it. does that make any sense logically to you?
Do you think they wood have allowed the Dems to lose house seats? Why are those votes not fraudulent in your opinion?
Click to expand...

There should ALWAYS be audits of EVERY election. To do otherwise is to allow complacency and corruption.
 
Somerville said:
Post #112 " All elections everywhere."
Click to expand...

Again state were I said DJT should remain in office while the elections were audited. Your welcome to search all the other threads as well.
 
Maybe I’m missing something but aren’t these arguments tht McConnell cheated analogous to what the GOP is accusing Dems of doing? Are the lefties admitting these are effective election fraud?
 
Bullseye said:
Maybe I’m missing something but aren’t these arguments tht McConnell cheated analogous to what the GOP is accusing Dems of doing? Are the lefties admitting these are effective election fraud?
Click to expand...

Difference has been mentioned elsewhere - the machines in Kentucky don't use paper ballots, unlike the Dominion machines. No paper trail to check, unlike the Dominion devices.
 
PirateMk1 said:
Again state were I said DJT should remain in office while the elections were audited. Your welcome to search all the other threads as well.
Click to expand...

Then you don't mind that Nancy Pelosi would become the Chief Executive until the audits are completed? You are correct - you did not specifically say that DJT would stay in the White House but considering past posts, that was the assumption I made.
 
Somerville said:
Then you don't mind that Nancy Pelosi would become the Chief Executive until the audits are completed? You are correct - you did not specifically say that DJT would stay in the White House but considering past posts, that was the assumption I made.
Click to expand...

I want a complete and total forensic audit. Period. I dont give shit who thinks they have power.
 
PirateMk1 said:
Really? Officially forensically? All 50 states? Do tell.
Click to expand...
Any thing that raises a red flag or anytime a candidate wants to recount if the percentage falls within the realm of question. You won’t accept the realists anyway so what’s the point
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom