• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Bush vs Hillary

  • Thread starter Thread starter FallingPianos
  • Start date Start date

Bush or Hillary?

  • Total voters
    22
F

FallingPianos

suppose that term limits didnt exist on the president, and that Bush was running for a 3rd term this coming election.

if it came down to Bush vs Hillary, who would you vote for?
 
I don't understand the point of all these hypothetical elections in the Poll section. What is the goal of the question?
 
Reps and cons hate anything Clinton.

They are freaking out that the Clinton's are winning every poll, except 1.

The only poll Clinton is losing is against a another democrat, not a rep.

ergo, more polls...
 
FallingPianos said:
suppose that term limits didnt exist on the president, and that Bush was running for a 3rd term this coming election.

if it came down to Bush vs Hillary, who would you vote for?
Click to expand...

a) A third party candidate.

b) Myself.

c) A random homeless guy.

d) My dog.

All of the above are better options than the two presented in this poll.
 
Originally posted by Psychoclown
a) A third party candidate.

b) Myself.

c) A random homeless guy.

d) My dog.

All of the above are better options than the two presented in this poll.
Click to expand...
What websites did you get that propaganda from?

I don't believe it.
 
Psychoclown said:
a) A third party candidate.

b) Myself.

c) A random homeless guy.

d) My dog.

All of the above are better options than the two presented in this poll.
Click to expand...

I agree. Let's hope this won't be the case.
 
Gibberish said:
I don't understand the point of all these hypothetical elections in the Poll section. What is the goal of the question?
Click to expand...

I dont really have a goal... I'm honestly. both are people who people have very strong opinions about. just curious, I guess.
 
Originally Posted by Psychoclown
That's a first.
Click to expand...
Here's another first...

In all those assertions made from all those websites in all my posts,
only "one" was proven to be not true.

And it wasn't from you!

Wanna take a shot at it?
 
Billo, I have better things to do with my time than debunk your propaganda links. You have absolutely no discernment when it comes to sources. Would you take a white supremist group's word for it on race relations or the Holocaust?

And come to think of it, don't you have better things to do than get into another "Billo posts propaganda BS" debate? Shouldn't you be upgrading your tin foil hat with another protective layer?

(In all seriousness, we shouldn't hijack this thread. If you want to continue this discussion, we can take it to the basement or a new thread or we can drop the banter here, your call.)
 
Originally posted by Psychoclown
Billo, I have better things to do with my time than debunk your propaganda links. You have absolutely no discernment when it comes to sources. Would you take a white supremist group's word for it on race relations or the Holocaust?

And come to think of it, don't you have better things to do than get into another "Billo posts propaganda BS" debate? Shouldn't you be upgrading your tin foil hat with another protective layer?

(In all seriousness, we shouldn't hijack this thread. If you want to continue this discussion, we can take it to the basement or a new thread or we can drop the banter here, your call.)
Click to expand...
Just like I thought, you don't have the balls or the argument to prove any of the claims false. I'm not going to hijack this thread; I'm going to start another one with this theme in mind. Because I'm sick of all these brain-dead moron's complaining these things are false soley their opinion of the websites they come from. It's disengenous at best to automatically treat something as "false" based soley on the website the particular assertion that is made.

That's all I have to say about that in this thread.

Hillary kicking Bush's a.s.s like she is her democratic rivals. Republican rivals aren't even in the election.

I said that figuratively, not literally, in case you get any ideas!
 
Originally posted by buttonpsi
It is always the better of two evils. ahhh...refreshing.
Click to expand...
The trouble is, the lesser of two evils, is still evil.

And when it comes to Bush and Hillary, that's a true statement.
 
Originally posted by buttonpsi
The problem is when an individual claims one of them is "good" which I see going on.
Click to expand...
It's only a problem if that individual is not you. As long as you decide for yourself what is good and evil...

That's not news. I'm sure you're aware of that.

For me, their both evil.
 
Billo_Really said:
It's only a problem if that individual is not you. As long as you decide for yourself what is good and evil...

That's not news. I'm sure you're aware of that.

For me, their both evil.
Click to expand...

To me, I see it as a problem for the person who thinks they aren't evil too.

I see a problem growing, a debt growing, a population growing...etc

I see dinosuars sometimes though, so maybe I am crazy... :lol:
 
Hillary TKO's Bush in 6.
 
(d) Psychoclown's dog. Most likely more intelligent than Bush and better looking than Clinton. It's a win-win situation.
 
Isn't that what this election cycle is going to be about?? It seems as if the democratic platform is running against Bush right now, and he's not up for re-election.

That said, Psychoclowns dog gets another vote. Although Billo would cry foul when ALPO stock prices started to increase under the dogs watch.
 
WI Crippler said:
Isn't that what this election cycle is going to be about?? It seems as if the democratic platform is running against Bush right now, and he's not up for re-election.

That said, Psychoclowns dog gets another vote. Although Billo would cry foul when ALPO stock prices started to increase under the dogs watch.
Click to expand...

Its not just the Democrats, the Republicans are doing everything they can to distance themselves from the disasterous presidency of Bush as well.
The reality is....as much as the GOP would like the Democrats to not remind the American people of what Bush has done to this Country, Bush is theirs. And as much as they want to run from it, they aren't going to be able to.
Yes...GWB isn't running...but that doesn't mean that the Country should turn a blind eye to what shape the GOP has put our Country in.
 
disneydude said:
Its not just the Democrats, the Republicans are doing everything they can to distance themselves from the disasterous presidency of Bush as well.
The reality is....as much as the GOP would like the Democrats to not remind the American people of what Bush has done to this Country, Bush is theirs. And as much as they want to run from it, they aren't going to be able to.
Yes...GWB isn't running...but that doesn't mean that the Country should turn a blind eye to what shape the GOP has put our Country in.
Click to expand...

Well one of the front runners is a govenor, so no real tie to the Bush Admin, or Congress. Another was a NYC mayor, and the third was an actor. Only McCain is the one that can be punished by pollsters for being a part of Geroge Bushs evil mastermind plan for killing children,black people, and arabs.
 
WI Crippler said:
Well one of the front runners is a govenor, so no real tie to the Bush Admin, or Congress. Another was a NYC mayor, and the third was an actor. Only McCain is the one that can be punished by pollsters for being a part of Geroge Bushs evil mastermind plan for killing children,black people, and arabs.
Click to expand...

Fair or not....the performance of GWB is a reflection on the GOP and something that as much as they want to, they are not going to be able to run away from. The interesting thing will be to watch how much GWB is involved in campaigning for the eventual nominee.
 
disneydude said:
Fair or not....the performance of GWB is a reflection on the GOP and something that as much as they want to, they are not going to be able to run away from. The interesting thing will be to watch how much GWB is involved in campaigning for the eventual nominee.
Click to expand...

I'll agree that George Bush has sullied the Republican image overall, and has raped the meaning of conservatism in the view of the uninformed. But my point was that 3 of the 4 leading candidates had little to nothing to do with the very platforms the democrats are running on. In fact Ron Paul has a leg up on everyone as far as voting records go.But he's not a front runner at this point.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom