- Joined
- Jun 21, 2013
- Messages
- 16,763
- Reaction score
- 4,344
- Location
- Melbourne Florida
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Other
"in your family" means owned to most people. WTF? Additionally did you not read the OP, his family have been on their 160 acres since 1948. hardly close to the 1800s you try to claim.
Too bad those who are so outraged aren't as outraged at welfare freeloaders, or workmans comp freeloaders, or healthcare freeloaders....
When the G lied about the turtles, they lost their sympathy from me.
They would have also gotten a lot farther with a brace of attorneys then armed BLM officers playing SWAT.
They originally homesteaded a ranch in 1877. Rights to water and grazing followed to other areas where the rancher moved to. What part of that dont you understand. Or, just for arguement. Lets say you are right, and they have been there since 1946. What difference does it make? He feels the charges are unconstitutional based on its a state rights issue and not a fed issue.
Thing is you may not have heard but, They have driven off ALL the other ranchers. He is pretty much he last one in that area, guess you dont care that they are driving away food producers though huh?
The Bundy is raising grass fed beef. Most beef is grain fed. Bundy amounts to the dirty hippies who raise free range chickens and charging several bucks or more for a dozen eggs.So if you are buying beef from a regular grocery store it is grain fed.What the average person pays for beef is not being effected by closing public lands to grazing.But hey beef prices just hit an all time high! nothing to see here
So you would just sell property that has been in your family since the 1800s. Versus fight to keep it and stand strong.
If it's a state's rights issue as you say, Bundy should pay state's fees, $12 a head in Nevada, compared to $1.35 a head to the BLM .He feels the charges are unconstitutional based on its a state rights issue and not a fed issue.
Too bad those who are so outraged aren't as outraged at welfare freeloaders, or workmans comp freeloaders, or healthcare freeloaders....
So you would just sell property that has been in your family since the 1800s. Versus fight to keep it and stand strong.
If it's a state's rights issue as you say, Bundy should pay state's fees, $12 a head in Nevada, compared to $1.35 a head to the BLM .
It's not a US Govt flag.
The idea of "ancestral" rights seems to be getting pretty hot.No, then he would claim that the state doesn't exist and he is a freeman, and all that nonsense that tax cheating deadbeats say.
I'm amazed that anyone still backs this welfare queen thief.
If you're the landlord you can raise the rent for any reason you want in most states provided sufficient notice was given. If I don't like paying the rent I can move.If I raised your rent, based on a lie. How would you react?
Most of those freeloaders aren't using militias to defend their right to freeload.Too bad those who are so outraged aren't as outraged at welfare freeloaders, or workmans comp freeloaders, or healthcare freeloaders....
What a freakin' surprise, Cliven Bundy is a liar when he says "My rights are before the BLM even existed,"
What a freakin' surprise, Cliven Bundy is a liar when he says "My rights are before the BLM even existed,"
Bundy has no rights here. He needs to pay his bills like an adult and move on.
That said, if cops try to invade his property, every one of them should be shot.
This is a money matter. Just put a lien on his land if he won't pay and move on.
Please continue to defend scofflaw Bundy and his militia cowards like this until election day.So..... Bundy's claims of personal history are just as legitimate as Elizabeth Warren's, then?
Of course there is, I just said it.There is no "that said" in this case.
Liens can't be ignored. The IRS just takes the money out of your accounts. There's no cops, just an IRS clerk thousands of miles away clicking a few buttons. They could freeze all his assets making him unable to even sell a cow until the bill is played. This fact allone establishes reasonable suspicion that the state is not acting in good faith.A lien on his land will be ignored as with all other attempts beginning with Mr. Clinton.
If they don't respect due process, yeah, shoot them down. The whole reason we have the second amendment is to retain the right to kill governments who act tyrannical.Only Cops can enforce a lien, cops who you want shot down, even though the lien takes away ownership of the property.
Oh grow up.Shame on you for advocating shooting cops .
I don't get the reference.So..... Bundy's claims of personal history are just as legitimate as Elizabeth Warren's, then?
Really?
Sometimes it is better not to reply, than to make a reply that is that stupid.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?