My relationship does, the idea of that marriage certificate does not
Please cite the exact passage in the Constitution where marriage is listed as a right. If you can't (and you can't) you're wrong.
Only the bigots are disgusted. Rational people see this as a victory for all.
My relationship does, the idea of that marriage certificate does not
The Supreme Court may have forced this down our throats, but this just makes me hate gays where before, I didn't.
You do NOT have my permission to use my post as a signature, and to do so would violate forum rules.
I can point to fourteen Supreme Court decisions (fifteen once you count today's decision) that rules marriage is a right.
Just out: U S S.Ct. rules that there is a constitutional right to same sex marriage, going further than just ruling that states have to recognize it, if performed in a state where it's legal.
This has an impact on the 14 states that have passed laws banning it.
NOTE: The ruling was NOT just that states have to recognize it. The ruling is that it is now LEGAL, being constitutionally protected. It COULD HAVE made the ruling more narrow, but it did not. It went all the way. The matter is now settled. Gay marriage is legal, like interracial marriage is.
NBC
I'm too angry to answer you right now, jumping jack. Enjoy your victory
What a ****ing retarded lie.
This ruling violates the Constitution.
Abandoning the rule of law in favor of judicial fiat is not a victory for rationality. No bigotry against homosexuals required to see how this is an awful, awful thing for the Supreme Court to do.
You do NOT have my permission to use my post as a signature, and to do so would violate forum rules.
First of all, public accommodation laws are a different topic. Second of all, private churches aren't subject to those laws. Churches do not have to perform any ceremony they don't want to.
Plenty of actual research has been done and found no negative effects on the child. Marriage improves conditions for children.
I will remove it if prompted. It is not a taunt or taken out of context. It is a direct quote. I do not believe I need your permission under forum rules to quote you in that regard, but if I do, why not give it to me if it is how you genuinely feel and what you stand by?
I dont need to. His intent was made clear. But...1-I'm not a lawyer. 2-It isn't relevant. The decision is what it is. 3-It is irrelevant whatever other fluff mixed with the occasional legal justification they have given. Their intent was made clear. This isnt about a decision based on law...its about emotion. And finally...4-I dont have a say in this, wont be casting a vote in this so reviewing 80 pages of blather makes no sense.Try reading the other eighty pages instead of just one sentence.
OK.... and you got your law degree from what school? when? do you still practice?
Abandoning the rule of law in favor of judicial fiat is not a victory for rationality. No bigotry against homosexuals required to see how this is an awful, awful thing for the Supreme Court to do.
I will remove it if prompted. It is not a taunt or taken out of context. It is a direct quote. I do not believe I need your permission under forum rules to quote you in that regard, but if I do, why not give it to me if it is how you genuinely feel and what you stand by?
You do need permission to have a quote in your sig, and you don't have it. Do you really have to make the mods get involved in enforcement when it's already been spelled out to you?
Well, you're in the right state to hate gays; you will fit right in.
The fact that you can marry means I will not be asking my girlfriend to marry me...I don't want to share the same institution as you.
You may have won a court case, and the left-leaning folks on this site may support you, but you will NEVER be socially accepted by mainstream America.
I never had a problem with gays before today, but this is too much. I will not be your friend.
We didn't abandon the rule of law. The constitution is the supreme law of the land and the constitution was upheld today.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?