- Joined
- Sep 2, 2017
- Messages
- 33,607
- Reaction score
- 5,193
- Location
- GDL/Sweden
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Centrist
"We're very lucky that they're so f*cking stupid." - A Ukrainian Soldier, 2022
100% agree with you , too late for Moscow ´s ulusA couple of weeks ago, Putin might have had a window in which he could have declared victory, withdrawn his forces from Ukraine, and kept control of the Donbas and Crimea. But with Ukraine not only surviving but now driving Russia back in some cases, Zelensky probably no longer feels it has to compromise on anything beyond remaining a neutral country.
100% agree with you , too late for Moscow ´s ulus
dont forget that many middle age man are losing their jobs , and can´t find the new one. specially small cities in Muscovy heart landPutin's in a dangerous position. As I put it in another thread, a dictator can put down a grassroots revolt, and he can put down a revolt of the elites, but if the elites and grassroots unite against him...night night, Putin.
ps , great video on this subjectPutin's in a dangerous position. As I put it in another thread, a dictator can put down a grassroots revolt, and he can put down a revolt of the elites, but if the elites and grassroots unite against him...night night, Putin.
Then why would they make such a risky airborne operation if it was not to try to blitz Kyiv? And Russia had 2 CAA's and elements of a third in the north at the beginningThat's not necessarily true. You would also want to seige kyiv if you want to draw away their forces. For russia, their most elite units have always been in southeast the entire time. Kyiv has been a battle of cannon fodder on both sides.
But that was not their primary objectiveMariupol is a major city.
I mean, if you think opening multiple fronts and significantly pushing on all of them, especially the south toward Dnipro, Odessa, and Mariupol was not trying to do anything to annex the country you are mistaken. I do believe taking the Donbass is a limited war goal as compared to trying to capitulate the country and make grand, sweeping advances.Is annexing the donbass really a limited goal? I don't think so. If I wanted to annex british columbia, i would expect to fight all of canada. Putin just escalated it quickly, but he didn't really do anything to annex the entire country.
OfcThat being said, i expect any deal to require Ukraine to stay of nato/EU.
I didn't say they didn't WANT kyiv. They do. Taking kyiv would put the russians in the ideal position for negotiations. Hence why they are trying to take it, and establish air superiority throughout the country from the beginning.Then why would they make such a risky airborne operation if it was not to try to blitz Kyiv?
Again, if russia's main goal was taking kyiv, much more of their regular elite units would have been concentrated there. I said from the beginning of this invasion, that putin was only interested in the donbass, and initially, i was confused that he would do a full scale attack on all parts of ukraine. However, I see the wisdom in him doing so.......it's a brutal tactic, and i'm not sure it 'worked'. But it seems mariupol has already fallen, or on the very verge of falling. The azov battallian and extremist groups there have all but been destroyed, the south is entirely his.And Russia had 2 CAA's and elements of a third in the north at the beginning
But that was not their primary objective
I mean, if you think opening multiple fronts and significantly pushing on all of them, especially the south toward Dnipro, Odessa, and Mariupol was not trying to do anything to annex the country you are mistaken. I do believe taking the Donbass is a limited war goal as compared to trying to capitulate the country and make grand, sweeping advances.
Ofc
dont forget that many middle age man are losing their jobs , and can´t find the new one. specially small cities in Muscovy heart land
And corrupt:"We're very lucky that they're so f*cking stupid." - A Ukrainian Soldier, 2022
They wanted to take Kyiv quickly not to have the upper hand in negotiations, such a large force amassed at the border was not just to pressure Ukraine to the negotiating table, but to secure Putin's legacy as a conqueror and the rejuvenator of the Russian empire through total annexation and imposition of a puppet government.I didn't say they didn't WANT kyiv. They do. Taking kyiv would put the russians in the ideal position for negotiations. Hence why they are trying to take it, and establish air superiority throughout the country from the beginning.
There were elite units, Spetznaz, VDV, Chechens, PMCs, along with the regular army. Putin was never looking to just take the Donbass, such an invasion was meant as a grand sweeping operation, capitulating Ukraine and dazzling Putin with glory.Again, if russia's main goal was taking kyiv, much more of their regular elite units would have been concentrated there. I said from the beginning of this invasion, that putin was only interested in the donbass, and initially, i was confused that he would do a full scale attack on all parts of ukraine. However, I see the wisdom in him doing so.......it's a brutal tactic, and i'm not sure it 'worked'. But it seems mariupol has already fallen, or on the very verge of falling. The azov battallian and extremist groups there have all but been destroyed, the south is entirely his.
I think at this point we're at a crossroads. Russia needs to quickly finish the Mariupol siege and reinforce the other fronts because Ukraine is apparently pushing closer to Kherson and if they retake it not only would that be bad PR, but Ukraine would get a morale boost and a tactical victory. Gradual gains in the Donbass are all well and good, but they need to urgently pull out troops from areas like around Kyiv and Kharkiv where no progress is being made and an assault is simply not feasible, and relocate them to other theaters.Where kyiv is going to be in play here, is whether or not russia can force ukraine to remain neutral. This is I am much more skeptical of, even if Putin had taken kyiv. I pointed this out, also, from the very beginning, there was no way a country of 144 million was going to be able to hold a country of 45 million pissed off ukrainians permanently, without expenses that russia could never have afforded even in an booming economy. The idea that Putin was going to suddenly sweep in and take the entire country....just wasn't feasible. Ukraine would have become his afghanistan on steroids.
A couple of weeks ago, Putin might have had a window in which he could have declared victory, withdrawn his forces from Ukraine, and kept control of the Donbas and Crimea. But with Ukraine not only surviving but now driving Russia back in some cases, Zelensky probably no longer feels it has to compromise on anything beyond remaining a neutral country.
so putin started this entire war, risking a defeat, just because he cared about having the reputation of being a conqueror?They wanted to take Kyiv quickly not to have the upper hand in negotiations, such a large force amassed at the border was not just to pressure Ukraine to the negotiating table, but to secure Putin's legacy as a conqueror and the rejuvenator of the Russian empire through total annexation and imposition of a puppet government.
their forces quickly seiged mariupol since this war begin and put most of their resources there. I'm sorry you don't like that fact.There were elite units, Spetznaz, VDV, Chechens, PMCs, along with the regular army. Putin was never looking to just take the Donbass, such an invasion was meant as a grand sweeping operation, capitulating Ukraine and dazzling Putin with glory.
Right well, I don't think morale is much of a factor on the ukrainian side at this point. They don't view the russians as an occupying force of which they evaluate and choose freely which side they want to take, but an invading force that cares little for their opinion of russia. Every abandoned tank raises their morale, and every dead ukrainian cements their anger toward the russian force. Russian forces simply can't worry about ukrainian morale, they should focus on establishing military victories through any means they have. 1 ukrainian soldier may have all the morale in the world, if the other 99 are dead, it means nothing.I think at this point we're at a crossroads. Russia needs to quickly finish the Mariupol siege and reinforce the other fronts because Ukraine is apparently pushing closer to Kherson and if they retake it not only would that be bad PR, but Ukraine would get a morale boost and a tactical victory. Gradual gains in the Donbass are all well and good, but they need to urgently pull out troops from areas like around Kyiv and Kharkiv where no progress is being made and an assault is simply not feasible, and relocate them to other theaters.
I'm guessing you volunteered and killed 100 russian soldiers at this point?Crying proud boy went over to play live action war and realized it was too real for him , tucked tail and ran.
And corrupt:
According to the Intel. Dept. of Ukraine MoD, only 1 out of 10 battle tanks in the storages of the 4th Russian tank division is battle-ready.
Because of this, a commander of the 13th regiment of the 4th Rus. tank division committed suicide.
He cared about his legacy, and the revival of Russia. And a limited war in Donbass would only make Ukraine more amenable to joining NATO, would it not? The Kremlin most certainly understood that Ukraine would never be forced to the negotiating table with a limited war in the Donbass, a shock operation would be needed to toppled the government and prevent NATO expansion, hence the incredibly risky airborne drop and the subsequent ground push.so putin started this entire war, risking a defeat, just because he cared about having the reputation of being a conqueror?
"Quickly". If they had the same amount of forces there as they did pushing towards Kyiv and Kharkiv, it wouldn't have taken them a literal week to surround it. You dont want to die on this hill.We're talking about the president of russia here, not a cheap democrat activist.
their forces quickly seiged mariupol since this war begin and put most of their resources there. I'm sorry you don't like that fact.
Right well, I don't think morale is much of a factor on the ukrainian side at this point. They don't view the russians as an occupying force of which they evaluate and choose freely which side they want to take, but an invading force that cares little for their opinion of russia. Every abandoned tank raises their morale, and every dead ukrainian cements their anger toward the russian force. Russian forces simply can't worry about ukrainian morale, they should focus on establishing military victories through any means they have. 1 ukrainian soldier may have all the morale in the world, if the other 99 are dead, it means nothing.
evidence please.He cared about his legacy, and the revival of Russia.
lol kysYou dont want to die on this hill.
what a dumb postI'm guessing you volunteered and killed 100 russian soldiers at this point?
Putin has repeatedly stated that the dissolution of the USSR has been the greatest geopolitical catastrophe of the 20th century (not because he was a communist since he's an anti-Bolshevik) and has invoked the glory of the Russian Empire numerous times as well being a fervent federal Russian nationalist.evidence please.
Peak discourselol kys
well, he volunteered to go there himself. What did you do?what a dumb post
why not just ask him if he did?
Evidence please, for the bolded part.their forces quickly seiged mariupol since this war begin and put most of their resources there. I'm sorry you don't like that fact.