Wehrwolfen
Banned
- Joined
- May 11, 2013
- Messages
- 2,329
- Reaction score
- 402
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
Obama cannot even get Harry Reid under control, so I doubt he is going to be able to get Mother Nature to sit down for a microbrewed cold one let alone get her to stop bitch slapping him.
Well someone is doing Obama's bidding. If it isn't Reid could it be Schumer?
New NASA Data Blow Gaping Hole In Global Warming Alarmism
Forbes
James Taylor
July 27, 2011
NASA satellite data from the years 2000 through 2011 show the Earth's atmosphere is allowing far more heat to be released into space than alarmist computer models have predicted, reports a new study in the peer-reviewed science journal Remote Sensing. The study indicates far less future global warming will occur than United Nations computer models have predicted, and supports prior studies indicating increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide trap far less heat than alarmists have claimed.
Study co-author Dr. Roy Spencer, a principal research scientist at the University of Alabama in Huntsville and U.S. Science Team Leader for the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer flying on NASA's Aqua satellite, reports that real-world data from NASA's Terra satellite contradict multiple assumptions fed into alarmist computer models.
"The satellite observations suggest there is much more energy lost to space during and after warming than the climate models show," Spencer said in a July 26 University of Alabama press release. "There is a huge discrepancy between the data and the forecasts that is especially big over the oceans."
[Excerpt]
Read more:
New NASA Data Blow Gaping Hole In Global Warming Alarmism
There are discrepancies about the issue and there have already been proven hoaxes found that show that Al Gore and Obama both are blowing smoke up you know where.
It is the other way around. Obama is doing Reid's bidding.
“Ninety-seven percent of climate scientists agree that climate-warming trends over the past century are very likely due to human activities,1and most of the leading scientific organizations worldwide have issued public statements endorsing this position. The following is a partial list of these organizations, along with links to their published statements and a selection of related resources.”
Climate Change: Consensus
Science denialists are hilarious.
This sort of thing shows why a little bit of science in an idiot's hand is a bad thing. It also shows why calling things global warming instead of pollution is causing problems. We have a problem with our air quality. It is getting worse. We see very real problems of pollutants. These things are not getting better, they are getting worse as we advance into more industry. We have large populations of the world just starting to get industrial like the first world. The populations and need for resources of people just getting into our new technology era dwarf those who are already in it. Whether or not you think the world is going to end from this is irrelevant. There is a reality we already face that pollution is becoming problematic to our health and survival.
Since you appreciate science you should be aware that pollutants become more concentrated as you move up the food chain. Since we are on top that is bad for us. If our soil becomes spoiled to where we cannot grow non-toxic food in it anymore we have a real problem. if you do not want to believe in global warming, I don't blame you. You should believe in the effects of pollution making your food and water contaminated with crap, or perhaps a lot more expensive to produce. Those effects are very real and we are already seeing them as a result of our use of things like fossil fuels.
By Dr. Tim Ball and Tom Harris
6/26/2013
President Barack Obama’s naïve and error-riddled speech at Georgetown University on Tuesday clearly demonstrated that he is serious about trying to stop global climate change. However, like the tide, climate change is a natural event of such proportions that it is largely unaffected by human activities. Obama ignores that the “official climate science” on which he bases America’s climate and energy policies has been washed away by 17 years without global warming, despite atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) — the gas Obama blames for rising temperatures — continuing to increase primarily due to the emissions of China and India.
(Excerpt)
Read more:
PJ Media » Blowing Smoke: Obama Climate Speech Riddled With Lies
"In foisting many of the same policies on America that have already failed in Europe, the president appears to be counting on U.S. media to continue to hide the significance of Climategate and the recent halt in planetary warming". Keep moving folks nothing to see here. Obama will calm and lower the seas and while he's at it stop the use of coal, nuclear and all types of fuel in America unless Americans are ready to pay higher and higher costs. See what gasoline and diesel fuel is costing Americans today compared to what Americans paid before Obama was elected and then re-elected.
That's amazing. All of those people are saying and doing on the job what their employer is telling them to say and do on the job.
I bet that's the only profession in which this surprising activity goes on.
Examples?
Er uh wolf, you’re jumping the gun there buddy. The original republican lie is that global warming is a hoax. The current republican lie is that the earth is warming but its natural. The future republican narrative will be “okay, its real and man made but wont be as bad as predicted”. And I hope the climate scientists quoted in the Forbes editorial are right but why did you chose to believe them? I thought all climate scientists are liars. And Spencer’s data was used for a decade to claim global warming was a hoax. At least now he acknowledges it real.NASA satellite data from the years 2000 through 2011 show the Earth's atmosphere is allowing far more heat to be released into space than alarmist computer models have predicted, reports a new study in the peer-reviewed science journal Remote Sensing. The study indicates far less future global warming will occur than United Nations computer models have predicted, and supports prior studies indicating increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide trap far less heat than alarmists have claimed.
Er uh wolf, you’re jumping the gun there buddy. The original republican lie is that global warming is a hoax. The current republican lie is that the earth is warming but its natural. The future republican narrative will be “okay, its real and man made but wont be as bad as predicted”. And I hope the climate scientists quoted in the Forbes editorial are right but why did you chose to believe them? I thought all climate scientists are liars. And Spencer’s data was used for a decade to claim global warming was a hoax. At least now he acknowledges it real.
Anyhoo, since you jumped the gun with the future republican narrative, do you admit that your first ‘editorial’ was lying?
sorry wolf, your new lying editorials do nothing about the fact that your 2nd editorial proved your first editorial was lie. Are we going to discuss the contradictory editorials you posted or are you just going to mindlessly post more lying editorials? no need to answer.
And why do you think you have post blogs and editorials? because you cant use facts. When you call somebody a liar, you post what they said and prove why its a lie. You continue to post editorials that assure us people are lying. remember the first editorial you posted in this thread. It assured us President Obama was lying. Sadly but not surprisingly, it was lying.
page 1Global Warming - NASA Scientist Dr. Hansen caught again,
...
Then explain the above. According to you there are no lies as long as Progressives say it's so.
You're missing the point. You keep posting editorials that assure us people are lying. In addition to me proving your first editorial was lying, you proved your first editorial is lying. See how you don't want to discuss that. You just keep posting more editorials. And Sen Inhofe saying somebody is lying is just like all your other editorials: he assures us they are lying. It doesn't prove it. again, your editorials only prove your determination to believe lies. Hey remember how your 'editorials' assured us President Obama was born in Kenya and his BC was a fake. at what point do you realize that you are being lied to?
97 % of climate scientists say global warming is real and man made. 1000s of lying editorials cant make that fact go away.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?