• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Blowing Smoke: Obama Climate Speech Riddled With Lies

WEBemis0701_345.gif.cms

/B][/I]
Of course, one has to ADD China's to the growing total and growing Concentration of Atmospheric CO2.
Even if emissions were capped at 1990 (1980, 1950, or even 1900) levels, CO2 concentration would continue growing.


BBC News - Carbon dioxide passes symbolic mark
Carbon dioxide passes symbolic mark
10 May 2013

Daily measurements of CO2 at a US government agency lab on Hawaii have topped 400 parts per million for the first time.
The station, which sits on the Mauna Loa volcano, feeds its numbers into a continuous record of the concentration of the gas stretching back to 1958.

The last time CO2 was regularly above 400ppm was 3-5 Million years ago - before modern humans existed.
Scientists say the climate back then was also considerably warmer than it is today.


Carbon dioxide is regarded as the most important of the manmade greenhouse gases blamed for raising the temperature on the planet over recent decades.
Human sources come principally from the burning of fossil fuels such as coal, oil and gas."..."

This is the May graph at co2now.org
June will show just over 400PPM.
Great for seeing the last 50-60 year damage as well.
co2_widget_brundtland_600_graph.gif
 
Last edited:
Hmm..., When was the last time anyone got information on the loss of the ozone layer? Have any on the side of reducing CO2 and other gases into the atmosphere asked China, India and Russia do the same and reduce their pollution? I don't think so. evidence shows that the the air pollution in China alone is almost if not totally toxic to it's own population. CO2 and SO2 emissions are so high in China that it can be seen and felt.

Actually, one of the main subjects of the recent meeting between Obama and the Chinese premier was (after our NSA imbroglio) climate change "In one tangible outcome of the summit, Obama and Xi agreed to cooperate in fighting climate change by cutting the use of hydrofluorocarbons, or HFCs, which are greenhouse gases."

And if you'll think about it, if the apartment complex is stinking from all the crap in everyone's rooms, and your room is one of the worst, do you go telling everyone else to clean up their rooms before you clean up yours? Or do you set the example by cleaning out your own pigpen and THEN telling the others "See, that's how you do it!"
 
you know wolf, for a guy who cant stop posting lying editorials and made up facts, you'd think clarifying your view on GW is wouldn't be such an ordeal. Why cant you just tell us your view. tell you what. Just tell us the letter of the narrative you believe

A its all a hoax
B yes the earth is warming but its natural
C yes its warming and man made but not as bad as predicted

ABC that's how easy global warming can be

er uh wolf?
 
Back
Top Bottom