Again, being a majority doesn't in and of itself prove anything.
Actually majority decisions count for a great deal in democracies.
You didn't even read the link! How do you ever expect to become knowledgeable if you don't read? Is it a left wing requirement??
At a certain point, a dominant majority is able to institute a groupthink which shuts down debate and causes key underlying assumptions and beliefs to go unchallenged. That is what is happening in many of our universities today. Diversity in everything but thought.
I know you think that's clever. You'd have to have the school denying difference of opinions. Evidence of hiring practices specifically designed to prevent hiring. An application question, like are you now or have you ever been a conservative. Evidence that not one professor, but that's majority of professors deny differing opinions or conservative thought in the classroom. Or that the school never, ever invites conservatives to the campus. Actual evidence of something actually being done.
Only in an actual vote. Not much otherwise.
And it doesn't matter. Anyone with such a number is just plain silly.
Is this an attempt to soak a post with sarcasm and wit? Remember, if that is the case, tone and inflection is lost on the internet.
If you're serious....I started laughing at the "money" part. Most of academia easily fall in the upper class category.
This has been provided to you in the past only to have you dismiss it. Face it, you will never accept the truth.
Incredible!!! Enjoy your bliss.
No it hasn't. You can find one professor at one place. I can find the opposite at another. We've done that. Your merely won't do the hard work and do an actual objective study.
That is inaccurate. They had full access to the intelligence community's information and assessments. Nor did Rice lie, that is an inaccurate but feel-good charge laid by those who confuse their strong opposition to the Iraq war with the need to demonize their opposition.
Read the OP article.
What it sounds like to me is that the Internet has spilled out into real life.
People can act like that on the Internet, "shouting each other down", being rude, having no consequences, and not ever having to face a new view or admit they are wrong. They expound on their opinions without true give and take, they can ignore opposing views. They absorb what they want and unlike conversations in real life, do not have to address the opposing view.
That is the way protesting today seems to work. Now they can be bold in crowds, protected by Constitutional rights and other laws, and not consider the actual give and take of discourse. They feel they can beat their opponents over their heads with their views and there is no way to have a dialogue unless you resort to trying to be louder. Which only inflames, it doesnt communicate.
You've been provided with studies, you've been provided with examples, you've even been provided with liberal academics themselves all but admitting that this takes place, now you ME, j-mac, a truck driver working 70 hours a week to conduct my own study? This is why it is hard to take you seriously....
No elected official outside of the administration's national security inside circle was privy to all of the information, esp. the information they didn't want outsiders to have.
That "smoking gun is a mushroom cloud" phrase is just one example of their attempts to mislead the public into that war. If you carefully parse their words, there were few outright lies. But in total, the administrations statements created a false impression of an imminent threat. The fact that they carefully avoided outright factual lies and used well-establish propaganda techniques indicates that they knew they were misrepresenting the reality of the situation.
While former Mayor Bloomberg was making a commencement address, I believe the points he made went beyond even Higher Education to the larger issue of a willingness to listen to diverse viewpoints (something that also seems increasingly infrequent when it comes to discussions of politics/policy and economics).
No, a survey about their beliefs, for example, doesn't prove they've doing anything wrong. And cherry picked examples, just as can be done with conservatives, doesn't prove anything. And no, I didn't expect you personally to do a study. I expect those throwing **** out to actually do something that proves something. Put the same critical eye on these that you would nonsense concerning conservatives and you'll see what mean.
We have done this dance before. And judging from your continued refusal to accept empirical studies and first hand accounts of liberal progressive indoctrination throughout our education system only serves to show the dishonesty of your position.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?