- Joined
- Jul 30, 2017
- Messages
- 12,099
- Reaction score
- 3,439
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Slightly Conservative
Bloomberg is such a hypocrite, hopefully he will never be President.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/bl...ivate-force-on-john-hopkins-university-campus
Bloomberg is such a hypocrite, hopefully he will never be President.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/bl...ivate-force-on-john-hopkins-university-campus
Because he's a politician and because he's a billionaire.can anyone make a rational argument as to why assholes like Bloomberg be allowed a greater level of firepower for his personal protection over other citizens?
Because he's a politician and because he's a billionaire.
There is a difference between being pro-gun and pro-2nd amendment. Because I am sure Nancy Pelosi, Diane Fiensteine, Michael Bloomberg, Barrack Obama, The Queen of England,Kim Jong-un, and various dictators, leftist politicians and other elites are pro-gun when it comes having someone with guns protecting their asses. But would not let the average person use a firearm to protect themselves.
can anyone make a rational argument as to why assholes like Bloomberg be allowed a greater level of firepower for his personal protection over other citizens?
You left Donnie Twump out of that list.
https://thehill.com/homenews/admini...-the-guns-first-go-through-due-process-second
Nothing stopping a private citizen from hiring a private security firm to protect them. Why are right wingers such cowards that they actually think they need protection? A famous person, a politician is no the same as a regular Dick and Jane
Nothing stopping a private citizen from hiring a private security firm to protect them. Why are right wingers such cowards that they actually think they need protection? A famous person, a politician is no the same as a regular Dick and Jane
Depends on what extent you want limits on the types of arms.Once again, the right being too stupid to even know what hypocrisy is. Fox news told them in a headline that it was hypocritical, so it must be. You can be for gun regulations, and trained private security having guns. You can want background checks, and limits on the types of arms and still be for the 2nd amendment.
Wanting protection does not make you a coward, its called being smart, its called being prepared.Nothing stopping a private citizen from hiring a private security firm to protect them. Why are right wingers such cowards that they actually think they need protection?
And yet its the left that is all for the regular Dick and Jane.A famous person, a politician is no the same as a regular Dick and Jane
Wanting protection does not make you a coward, its called being smart, its called being prepared.
Speaking of being prepared I find it outrageous that Bloomberg is an Eagle Scout, he should be stripped of his Eagle rank.
And yet its the left that is all for the regular Dick and Jane.
can anyone make a rational argument as to why assholes like Bloomberg be allowed a greater level of firepower for his personal protection over other citizens?
They believe they're lives are worth more than ours.
Some here believe that, too.
That's why Leftists can't be trusted with our civil rights.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?