• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Bloomberg is such a hypocrite

Bloomberg is such a hypocrite, hopefully he will never be President.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/bl...ivate-force-on-john-hopkins-university-campus

There is a difference between being pro-gun and pro-2nd amendment. Because I am sure Nancy Pelosi, Diane Fiensteine, Michael Bloomberg, Barrack Obama, The Queen of England,Kim Jong-un, and various dictators, leftist politicians and other elites are pro-gun when it comes having someone with guns protecting their asses. But would not let the average person use a firearm to protect themselves.
 
can anyone make a rational argument as to why assholes like Bloomberg be allowed a greater level of firepower for his personal protection over other citizens?
Because he's a politician and because he's a billionaire.
 
Because he's a politician and because he's a billionaire.

if the left wing gun haters were consistent, they would claim Bloomberg is a parasite and deserves LESS protection than working class people
 
There is a difference between being pro-gun and pro-2nd amendment. Because I am sure Nancy Pelosi, Diane Fiensteine, Michael Bloomberg, Barrack Obama, The Queen of England,Kim Jong-un, and various dictators, leftist politicians and other elites are pro-gun when it comes having someone with guns protecting their asses. But would not let the average person use a firearm to protect themselves.

You left Donnie Twump out of that list.

https://thehill.com/homenews/admini...-the-guns-first-go-through-due-process-second
 
Once again, the right being too stupid to even know what hypocrisy is. Fox news told them in a headline that it was hypocritical, so it must be. You can be for gun regulations, and trained private security having guns. You can want background checks, and limits on the types of arms and still be for the 2nd amendment.

Sorry right wingers, you can try to dumb down the world to your level, but it has no bearing on reality
 
can anyone make a rational argument as to why assholes like Bloomberg be allowed a greater level of firepower for his personal protection over other citizens?

Nothing stopping a private citizen from hiring a private security firm to protect them. Why are right wingers such cowards that they actually think they need protection? A famous person, a politician is no the same as a regular Dick and Jane
 
Nothing stopping a private citizen from hiring a private security firm to protect them. Why are right wingers such cowards that they actually think they need protection? A famous person, a politician is no the same as a regular Dick and Jane

I was waiting for the hysterical anti gun leftwing perspective and you provided it. Its bloomberg who wants protection and doesn't want honest citizens being able to own the same firearms as his guards. Not Right wingers
 
Nothing stopping a private citizen from hiring a private security firm to protect them. Why are right wingers such cowards that they actually think they need protection? A famous person, a politician is no the same as a regular Dick and Jane

Who gets killed or assaulted more?
 
Once again, the right being too stupid to even know what hypocrisy is. Fox news told them in a headline that it was hypocritical, so it must be. You can be for gun regulations, and trained private security having guns. You can want background checks, and limits on the types of arms and still be for the 2nd amendment.
Depends on what extent you want limits on the types of arms.

And Fox is at least more reliable than the Chicken Noodle News CNN.
 
Nothing stopping a private citizen from hiring a private security firm to protect them. Why are right wingers such cowards that they actually think they need protection?
Wanting protection does not make you a coward, its called being smart, its called being prepared.

Speaking of being prepared I find it outrageous that Bloomberg is an Eagle Scout, he should be stripped of his Eagle rank.

A famous person, a politician is no the same as a regular Dick and Jane
And yet its the left that is all for the regular Dick and Jane.
 
Wanting protection does not make you a coward, its called being smart, its called being prepared.

Speaking of being prepared I find it outrageous that Bloomberg is an Eagle Scout, he should be stripped of his Eagle rank.


And yet its the left that is all for the regular Dick and Jane.

you have to understand that lefties worship government and thus lionize those who want to expand and run big government. Liberalism-loving mankind in general but hating people individually (Warren Murphy)
 
can anyone make a rational argument as to why assholes like Bloomberg be allowed a greater level of firepower for his personal protection over other citizens?

They believe they're lives are worth more than ours.
 
That's why Leftists can't be trusted with our civil rights.

It seems the position above is "commoner lives aren't important enough to allow them to protect themselves" but "they're important enough to restrict their rights as long as the elites can still protect themselves".
 
Back
Top Bottom