Black DC judge releases black teen charged with shooting AR-15 26 times into car

[RIP U.S. Democracy]

I have. You are just to uneducated on this topic to understand that fact.

No, you haven't. More lies and and even more trolling....as always from you.

 

[braindrain]

No, you haven't. More lies and and even more trolling....as always from you.

Tell me do you really think you are fooling anyone.

 

[uptower]

You forgot to add "Soros" like the article in the OP. Gotta have the anti-semitic dog whistle in there too.

It's a hidden message, like the number 88:

whose shot black rifle into black car in black neighbourhood where everything was...

The tip off was the typo - an astute reader would notice never make typos (nuh-huh, never, nosiree) and started from there.

 

[Ban Cars Not Guns]

Yes we all know a black judge can’t possibly uphold the law if the suspect is black. This must be because of race.
It’s impossible to even think up any other reason he would let this person out

So let's here it. Why did the judge release this guy if not because of race.?

 

[braindrain]

So let's here it. Why did the judge release this guy if not because of race.?

No I agree with you. The only possibility is because both the judge and the suspect were black. That’s it. The ONLY possibility.

 

[Craig234]

So let's here it. Why did the judge release this guy if not because of race.?

"hear". Because he judged his level of risk to fit this order not requiring incarceration. Of course some people want to demand zero risk - everyone charged with anything kept in solitary confinement pre-trial. If this were a white judge and white defendant, would you be hear posting screaming racism?

 

[holbritter]

Another DEI (Didn't Earn It) judge practicing pro-black racism.

Judge facing heat for releasing alleged DC teen shooter donated to Soros tied fund, posted about being 'woke'

A judge criticized for letting a teen who allegedly opened fire on a busy street out of jail before trial previously posted online about being "woke" and donated to a Soros group.

www.yahoo.com

You're descriptive sentence was not needed.
What the judge did, imo, is bad as it is. No need to bring race into it at all. How about we just condemn what the judge did without that reference, huh?


Judge should be held responsible if this guy ends up killing or injuring someone, releasing someone after they did this! WTF was he thinking?

 

[eohrnberger]

Another DEI (Didn't Earn It) judge practicing pro-black racism.

Judge facing heat for releasing alleged DC teen shooter donated to Soros tied fund, posted about being 'woke'

A judge criticized for letting a teen who allegedly opened fire on a busy street out of jail before trial previously posted online about being "woke" and donated to a Soros group.

www.yahoo.com

When you don't address the real underlying reason for firearm violence.
Hint: It's not the legal and responsible firearms owners who are the problem.
Yet, those are the people whom the gun banners want to deny their Constitutional Rights.

 

[RF667799]

Yet you still haven't told me how. I'm not taking a MAGA's word for it...sorry if that hurts your delicate feelings.


I'm not MAGA...you are. Just saying that you are MAGA DOES win the debate for me.

You people want to end American democracy and there is really no reason to attempt an intelligent debate with such people.

You might even really believe that.

 

[Toggle Almendro]

Lie.

That is incorrect. Reality is not a lie.

AR-15s are not for self-defense.

That is incorrect. AR-15s are for self defense.

Semi-automatic weapons are not for self-defense.

That is incorrect. Semi-automatic weapons are for self defense.

And the NRA and MAGA gun nuts are butthurt any time the government tries to ban these types of guns.

It is reasonable for people to object when the left violates their civil liberties.

This reliance on namecalling is a poor substitute for a compelling argument.

No idiot Repugs were making these extreme, 2nd Amendment arguments about the right to own ANY type of gun until the 1980s. That's a fact.
For the first 200 years of this country's history, nobody was making such stupid ass arguments. Not even the NRA.

Any type of gun? No one is making arguments for the ownership of nuclear artillery even today.

AR-15s kill huge amounts of people, quickly.

No they don't.

Sorry. I don't care about the white trash technical definition about what is or is not considered an assault rifle.

This reliance on namecalling is a poor substitute for a compelling argument.

If you choose to remain ignorant of what words mean, you will keep making foolish nonsense claims that have little to do with reality.

 

[rahl]

It's your fault that you obviously don't understand that the Dred Scott case had absolutely nothing to do with guns.

You need to actually read the ruling lol.

It's like going to an English class to discuss literature and the teacher makes a passing comment about the Constitution....completely irrelevant. Really moronic on your part.

It’s not my fault you don’t know the history of Supreme Court rulings regarding the 2nd amendment.

Just stick to your Dred Scott gooberism and you'll be OK....well, not really.

I’m ok now. I have over 160 years of constitutional law on my side. You have random thought bouncing in your head.

 

[RIP U.S. Democracy]

It’s not my fault you don’t know the history of Supreme Court rulings regarding the 2nd amendment.

This is last time I'm talking to you, because your MAGA trolling just ain't worth my time.

The ruling on the Dred Scott decision was about the rights of escaped slaves. It had nothing to do with the ****ing 2nd Amendment.

You have the debating skills of a squid.

 

[RIP U.S. Democracy]

You might even really believe that.

Why does the opinion of MAGA traitors matter? It doesn't.

You all forfeited your right to be taken seriously to by continuing to support Donald Trump after Jan 6.

 

[RF667799]

Why does the opinion of MAGA traitors matter? It doesn't.

You all forfeited your right to be taken seriously to by continuing to support Donald Trump after Jan 6.

You said MAGA! You win the debate again!

 

[braindrain]

You said MAGA! You win the debate again!

I honestly don’t know if I should feel sorry for him or laugh at him.
Every time he is getting his ass handed to him, he blurts out MAGA and pretends like he just won the internet.

 

[rahl]

This is last time I'm talking to you, because your MAGA trolling just ain't worth my time.

The ruling on the Dred Scott decision was about the rights of escaped slaves. It had nothing to do with the ****ing 2nd Amendment.

You have the debating skills of a squid.

Again, you need to read the ruling. And educate yourself about the history of court rulings around the 2nd amendment.

 

[Ban Cars Not Guns]

When you don't address the real underlying reason for firearm violence.
Hint: It's not the legal and responsible firearms owners who are the problem.
Yet, those are the people whom the gun banners want to deny their Constitutional Rights.

None of the gun grabbers care about safety. If they did they'd scream about cars. Americans do far far more killing with cars than guns. the gun grabbers want a dictatorship and that can't happen as long as most americans own guns.

 

[Ban Cars Not Guns]

That is incorrect. AR-15s are for self defense.

Of course. They can be used for hunting or target shooting but are not ideal for that. They are for fighting off criminals, esp the govt kind.

 

[Toggle Almendro]

They can be used for hunting or target shooting but are not ideal for that.

An AR-10 in .308 Winchester would make a pretty good deer and elk gun.