• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Black DC judge releases black teen charged with shooting AR-15 26 times into car

Ban Cars Not Guns said:
Yup - that's pretty much it. When you look at what the judge did - releasing a suspect who tried to kill people - then you have to figure it's about race.
Click to expand...
Oh, so Trump wants to release the White Nationalist Proud Boys from jail because he's part of the White Nationalist Brotherhood, got it, makes sense now. (snark)
 
Roadvirus said:
So was this guy:

www.mystateline.com

Illinois man on pretrial release kills wife in murder-suicide

VILLA PARK, Ill. (WTVO) — A man arrested on domestic battery charges in Chicago was on pretrial release when he killed his wife in a murder-suicide, authorities said. Police in Villa Park were call…
www.mystateline.com www.mystateline.com


Ankle monitors are becoming as effective and big a joke as TROs.
Click to expand...
So the judge released the guy into house arrest with a GPS because the guy is black? If the guy were white the black judge would jail him, is that right?
 
RIP U.S. Democracy said:
What bullshit ruling do you speak of?
Click to expand...
Dred Scott is the first mention of the individual right to keep and bear arms. Dozens of Supreme Court rulings since, including miller, heller, Caetano, McDonald and Bruen have told you what firearms you can’t ban.
 
rahl said:
Dred Scott is the first mention of the individual right to keep and bear arms. Dozens of Supreme Court rulings since, including miller, heller, Caetano, McDonald and Bruen have told you what firearms you can’t ban.
Click to expand...
OH MY GOD!!....The Dred Scott decision has NOTHING to do with gun control. What an idiotic statement!!

Regardless...the Dred Scott decision was overturned by the 13th and 14th Amendments....because the Dred Scott decision was about the rights of escaped slaves and black people in the U.S.

And there is NO Supreme Court decision that states American citizens can own EVERY type of gun. Not even Heller. You are simply making shit up.
 
RIP U.S. Democracy said:
OH MY GOD!!....The Dred Scott decision has NOTHING to do with gun control. What an idiotic statement!!
Click to expand...
It’s the first time the Supreme Court stated it’s an individual right.
RIP U.S. Democracy said:
Regardless...the Dred Scott decision was overturned by the 13th and 14th Amendments....because the Dred Scott decision was about the rights of escaped slaves and black people in the U.S.
Click to expand...
And dozens of other scotus rulings since then have reaffirmed the individual right and what you can and can’t ban lol.
RIP U.S. Democracy said:
And there is NO Supreme Court decision that states American citizens can own EVERY type of gun. Not even Heller. You are simply making shit up.
Click to expand...
This is called a strawman. The court had told you what you can’t ban. And that’s any firearm in common use.
 
Ban Cars Not Guns said:
Another DEI (Didn't Earn It) judge practicing pro-black racism.



www.yahoo.com

Judge facing heat for releasing alleged DC teen shooter donated to Soros tied fund, posted about being 'woke'

A judge criticized for letting a teen who allegedly opened fire on a busy street out of jail before trial previously posted online about being "woke" and donated to a Soros group.
www.yahoo.com www.yahoo.com
Click to expand...
From reading that article, it appears that the judge decided house arrest was sufficient.
www.yahoo.com

Judge facing heat for releasing alleged DC teen shooter donated to Soros tied fund, posted about being 'woke'

A judge criticized for letting a teen who allegedly opened fire on a busy street out of jail before trial previously posted online about being "woke" and donated to a Soros group.
www.yahoo.com www.yahoo.com
A spokesperson for the D.C. court system told Fox News Digital all defendants "have a presumption of innocence."

"In this matter — after hearing arguments from both sides and the arguments for detention — the judge determined that 24-hour home confinement on electronic monitoring with the education and social services already in place for the defendant that release, on these strict conditions did ‘ensure the safety of the defendant and the public,'" the spokesperson added.

The spokesperson also told Fox News Digital the defense "relied heavily" on the fact that Moody had no prior encounters with law enforcement, and he was provided educational support and family and community resources.

"Judge Nolan conducted a very thorough hearing … and spoke directly with defendant about the consequences of violating any portion of the release conditions," the spokesperson said.
Click to expand...

The prosecution disagreed.
The decision to release Moody on house arrest prompted outrage from many on social media. And prosecutors with the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Washington, D.C., requested an emergency hearing scheduled for May 22 to discuss the matter and potentially reverse it.

"The government presented evidence establishing probable cause that the defendant fired an AR-15 weapon approximately 26 times at a car driving away on a public street in the 1700 block of Independence Ave SE then dissembled the firearm and hid it away in a ceiling," the prosecutors wrote.

"Despite the egregiousness of this conduct, the strength of the case, including video evidence depicting it and two identifications of the defendant as the shooter, and the statutory presumption in favor of detention pending trial, the Magistrate Judge released the defendant."
Click to expand...
And I suspect you agree with their disagreement.
 
uptower said:
Black judge releases black kid whose shot black rifle into black car in black neighbourhood where everything was blacketty-black black black.

Are you scared yet folks, have I said it enough times?

Oh one more thing...BLACK!
Click to expand...

You forgot to add "Soros" like the article in the OP. Gotta have the anti-semitic dog whistle in there too.
 
Ban Cars Not Guns said:
HAHAHA Did you really say that.?? You think affirmative action is equal opportunity????
Click to expand...
You don't know what it is, and everything you say it's a waste of time to explain to you.
 
Ban Cars Not Guns said:
Yup - that's pretty much it. When you look at what the judge did - releasing a suspect who tried to kill people - then you have to figure it's about race.
Click to expand...
You said 'you' but you meant you.
 
Terrible precedent, I guess to "woke" America shooting an AR into a car with 4 people inside 26 times is not that big of a deal. Oh, and then disassembling it and hiding the weapon later was also not that big of a deal.

If this "criminal justice reform," then modern liberalism is no more interested in public safety than the NRA already is not.
 
rahl said:
It’s the first time the Supreme Court stated it’s an individual right.
Click to expand...
So what?? So did the 2nd Amendment!! What's your point??

The Supreme Court has NEVER said that Americans can own ANY type of gun they want...PERIOD!!

The Dred Scott decision...for ****'s sake, how stupid.
 
Ban Cars Not Guns said:
Another DEI (Didn't Earn It) judge practicing pro-black racism.



www.yahoo.com

Judge facing heat for releasing alleged DC teen shooter donated to Soros tied fund, posted about being 'woke'

A judge criticized for letting a teen who allegedly opened fire on a busy street out of jail before trial previously posted online about being "woke" and donated to a Soros group.
www.yahoo.com www.yahoo.com
Click to expand...

Obviously a pretty crappy judge that should not be on the bench. Maybe race related, maybe not. The judge may be a racist. Your op is definitely racist though. imo

This judge should face some sort of removal if possible.
 
RIP U.S. Democracy said:
So what?? So did the 2nd Amendment!! What's your point??
Click to expand...
You were wrong lol.
RIP U.S. Democracy said:
The Supreme Court has NEVER said that Americans can own ANY type of gun they want...PERIOD!!
Click to expand...
The Supreme Court had told you what you can’t ban. And that is any firearm in common use.
RIP U.S. Democracy said:
The Dred Scott decision...for ****'s sake, how stupid.
Click to expand...
I’m sorry that you don’t know what you are talking about regarding constitutional law and firearms. But now that you’ve been schooled, you have no excuse.
 
rahl said:
You were wrong lol.
Click to expand...
No, you were. You mistakenly said that guns rights advocates have been saying for over 200 years that the 2nd Amendment gives you a right to own ANY type of gun.

That is factually incorrect. Gun rights advocates did not start making this absurd argument until the 1980s. And the Supreme Court has NEVER said the 2nd Amendment gives you a right to own ANY type of gun.

But please....keep pulling more irrelevant bullshit out of your ass like your ****ing ridiculous comment about the Dred Scott decision.
 
RIP U.S. Democracy said:
No, you were.
Click to expand...
Nope
RIP U.S. Democracy said:
You mistakenly said that guns rights advocates have been saying for over 200 years that the 2nd Amendment gives you a right to own ANY type of gun.
Click to expand...
Strawman. I’ve correctly pointed out they the supreme court has repeatedly told you what you can’t ban.
RIP U.S. Democracy said:
That is factually incorrect.
Click to expand...
Nope.
RIP U.S. Democracy said:
Gun rights advocates did not start making this absurd argument until the 1980s.
Click to expand...
Proven false.
RIP U.S. Democracy said:
And the Supreme Court has NEVER said the 2nd Amendment gives you a right to own ANY type of gun.
Click to expand...
Strawman. The Supreme Court had told you what can’t be banned.
RIP U.S. Democracy said:
But please....keep pulling more irrelevant bullshit out of your ass like your ****ing ridiculous comment about the Dred Scott decision.
Click to expand...
I’m sorry that you’ve had your position curb stomped. But making shit up and pretending I said it doesn’t make you any less hilariously incorrect.
 
RIP U.S. Democracy said:
Nah.


Lie. AR-15s are not for self-defense. Semi-automatic weapons are not for self-defense. And the NRA and MAGA gun nuts are butthurt any time the government tries to ban these types of guns.
Click to expand...
You do realize that posting stupid shit that demonstrates that you have zero idea what you are talking about doesn’t make a good argument right?
 
braindrain said:
You do realize that posting stupid shit that demonstrates that you have zero idea what you are talking about doesn’t make a good argument right?
Click to expand...
Sorry. I don't care about the white trash technical definition about what is or is not considered an assault rifle.
 
Ban Cars Not Guns said:
Another DEI (Didn't Earn It) judge practicing pro-black racism.



www.yahoo.com

Judge facing heat for releasing alleged DC teen shooter donated to Soros tied fund, posted about being 'woke'

A judge criticized for letting a teen who allegedly opened fire on a busy street out of jail before trial previously posted online about being "woke" and donated to a Soros group.
www.yahoo.com www.yahoo.com
Click to expand...
Yes we all know a black judge can’t possibly uphold the law if the suspect is black. This must be because of race.
It’s impossible to even think up any other reason he would let this person out
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom