• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Bipartisan Concern Over Militarization of the Police

LowDown

Curmudgeon
DP Veteran
Joined
Jul 19, 2012
Messages
14,185
Reaction score
8,768
Location
Houston
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Libertarian
“I don’t see anybody from the libertarian or Republican movement who talk about small government and overstepping American citizens’ rights coming either on camera or social media to talk about [police militarization],” CNN contributor L.Z. Granderson said on Thursday.

How ignorant.

Commentators on both the left and right have expressed concern over police militarization.

“Historians looking back at this period in America’s development will consider it to be profoundly odd that at the exact moment when violent crime hit a 50-year low, the nation’s police departments began to gear up as if the country were expecting invasion — and, on occasion, to behave as if one were underway,” The National Review’s Charles C. W. Cooke wrote in June.

“If cops continue to take a warlike us-versus-them approach to policing the population, they just might bring the left and right together,” Fox host John Stossel noted that same month. “Government is reckless, whether it is intruding into our lives with byzantine regulations that destroy a fledgling business or with a flash-bang grenade like the one that critically wounded a child in a recent SWAT raid in Janesville, Georgia.”

“So you combine the cops overstepping the Constitution and their bounds …. some of them just starting to go dark inside, and the militarization of our police force and you have a very bad combination,” Glenn Beck observed in February. “How does that end?”

Washington Post commentator Radley Balko’s best-selling book, The Rise of the Warrior Cop, might be the definitive work on the subject of police militarization. Balko would hardly describe himself as left-leaning.

To be fair, left wingers don’t actually have to know things, because they have David Brock and Ezra Klein to tell them what to think and say.
 
How ignorant.

Commentators on both the left and right have expressed concern over police militarization.

To be fair, left wingers don’t actually have to know things, because they have David Brock and Ezra Klein to tell them what to think and say.

To be fair, it is just as well they didn't have tanks in Ferguson.
 
The same LZ Granderson who write a piece for CNN called "Don't be nosy about Fast and Furious" and said this:

We are a nosy country. Though to be fair, it's not entirely our fault. Between the 24/7 news cycle, social media and reality TV, we have been spoon fed other people's private business for so long we now assume it's a given to know everything. And if there are people who choose not to disclose, they must be hiding something. Being told that something's 'none of your business' is slowly being characterized as rude, and if such a statement is coming from the government, it seems incriminating. Times have changed. Yet, not everything is our business. And in the political arena, there are things that should be and need to be kept quiet. ... Heads should roll because of the Fast and Furious debacle. We don't need every detail of that operation to be made public in order for that to happen.

Don't be nosy about Fast and Furious - CNN.com

Interesting how it's okay when the entity at the center of a controversy is President Obama's administration, but in this situation, everyone needs to know every detail, and the Libertarians and Republicans need to be opining on it hourly.
 
To be fair, left wingers don’t actually have to know things, because they have David Brock and Ezra Klein to tell them what to think and say.

irony.jpg
 
doesn't seem like the right cares nearly as much
 
Libertarians have been criticizing the militarization of police since it started. We were then called crazy conspiracy theorists by both the left and the right. Now all of a sudden it's popular to criticize the police, and everyone is saying we don't speak out against it.

We just can't win. :roll:
 
Libertarians have been criticizing the militarization of police since it started. We were then called crazy conspiracy theorists by both the left and the right. Now all of a sudden it's popular to criticize the police, and everyone is saying we don't speak out against it.

We just can't win. :roll:


We've finally figured out a bipartisan approach that appeals to both republicans and democrats- blame the libertarians. :mrgreen:
 
To be fair, left wingers don’t actually have to know things, because they have David Brock and Ezra Klein to tell them what to think and say.

Yeah, and right wingers are known to be independent thinkers who don't happen to parrot one of the most laughable news networks on the planet. :roll:

The American Left has always stood against militarization and police brutality, and loudly at that, while the Right has tended to overlook such instances or dismiss them as unimportant.
 
Libertarians have been criticizing the militarization of police since it started. We were then called crazy conspiracy theorists by both the left and the right. Now all of a sudden it's popular to criticize the police, and everyone is saying we don't speak out against it.

We just can't win. :roll:

Oh! You are absolutely right.....because during civil right movement, Anti Vietnam demonstration, Anti Iraq war demonstration and Wall Street Movement it was all Libertarians that got the living shait beat out of them.

Diving Mullah
 
Oh! You are absolutely right.....because during civil right movement, Anti Vietnam demonstration, Anti Iraq war demonstration and Wall Street Movement it was all Libertarians that got the living shait beat out of them.

Yeah, actually, it largely was.
 
Yeah, and right wingers are known to be independent thinkers who don't happen to parrot one of the most laughable news networks on the planet. :roll:

The American Left has always stood against militarization and police brutality, and loudly at that, while the Right has tended to overlook such instances or dismiss them as unimportant.

The point of the OP was to point out that what you just wrote is false. Either ignorance or lying, take your pick.
 
The same LZ Granderson who write a piece for CNN called "Don't be nosy about Fast and Furious" and said this:

We are a nosy country. Though to be fair, it's not entirely our fault. Between the 24/7 news cycle, social media and reality TV, we have been spoon fed other people's private business for so long we now assume it's a given to know everything. And if there are people who choose not to disclose, they must be hiding something. Being told that something's 'none of your business' is slowly being characterized as rude, and if such a statement is coming from the government, it seems incriminating. Times have changed. Yet, not everything is our business. And in the political arena, there are things that should be and need to be kept quiet. ... Heads should roll because of the Fast and Furious debacle. We don't need every detail of that operation to be made public in order for that to happen.

Don't be nosy about Fast and Furious - CNN.com

Interesting how it's okay when the entity at the center of a controversy is President Obama's administration, but in this situation, everyone needs to know every detail, and the Libertarians and Republicans need to be opining on it hourly.

In addition to which, how many young black men have been violently killed in the St. Louis area over the past year? One hundred? And yet we only get upset as a nation over this one. With the "no snitching" campaign one gets the impression that some blacks feel that the subject of black on black crime ought to stay within the black community. In any case, a black man walking in the hood has a lot more to fear from other blacks than from the police, so I don't get this whole ginning up riots thing. Why don't they direct their ire where the real bulk of the problem is?
 
In addition to which, how many young black men have been violently killed in the St. Louis area over the past year? One hundred? And yet we only get upset as a nation over this one. With the "no snitching" campaign one gets the impression that some blacks feel that the subject of black on black crime ought to stay within the black community. In any case, a black man walking in the hood has a lot more to fear from other blacks than from the police, so I don't get this whole ginning up riots thing. Why don't they direct their ire where the real bulk of the problem is?

That's an excellent point, Lowdown. Black men are killed virtually daily in that area, yet there are never protests, looting fests, riots, and everyone from Al Sharpton to President Obama weighing in. Why is this story the one that is getting all the attention? Don't get me wrong - if the cop was wrong, he deserves to be punished. But there is a systematic problem that for some reason isn't being addressed.
 
The majority of murders in this country are black on black, and the MSM doesn't seem to care. Its a nonstory to them, same with black killing nonblack, eh whatever. Buuut white killing black, THEN you get to play the "america is a racist country" now that's a story!! Remember the Congo? Over 5,000,000
Killed and you barely heard about, why??? Black on black.
 
That's an excellent point, Lowdown. Black men are killed virtually daily in that area, yet there are never protests, looting fests, riots, and everyone from Al Sharpton to President Obama weighing in. Why is this story the one that is getting all the attention? Don't get me wrong - if the cop was wrong, he deserves to be punished. But there is a systematic problem that for some reason isn't being addressed.

There is a systemic problem with race in our law enforcement and judicial systems. It upsets people.
 
All this talk about militarization of police is distracting from one obvious point....we don't have a militarized police problem, we have a racism problem.

Why didn't the militarized police show up when Bundy and his teahadists tried to keep the BLM from enforcing federal law?
 
All this talk about militarization of police is distracting from one obvious point....we don't have a militarized police problem, we have a racism problem.

Why didn't the militarized police show up when Bundy and his teahadists tried to keep the BLM from enforcing federal law?

There's no "race problem". For one, the "teahadist" weren't being violent at the time, putting others at risk so there wasn't a need for an immediate response. Also, you know why this shooting is big news? Because it doesn't happened every day that's why. And perhaps we should wait until an actual trial before we render any judgements hmm?
 
Back
Top Bottom