I have not offered any opinions.
I have no such misunderstanding.
The 2nd prevents most of the gun regulation you would like to implement. Other amendments preclude the rest.
You keep saying it, but you provide nothing but your words to support the position you take and the attacks you make on my position. Those words mean jack. Get specific, or not, no difference to me.
As you know, this is quite false. I've given you the constitutional basis for why you can't do what you wish to do.
I've been very specific.
Then why don't you repeat it? Just more of the same blah blah blah. Let's try this.
I have no obligation to.
As you know, this is demonstrably false. There is a written record in this thread showing you that.
I don't know. You are either too lazy to do it, or you are telling lies about doing it.
Of course you do
I have no obligation to keep refuting you. I've done it, you know that I have done it, and there is a written record of it in the thread. You are free to reference that post as many times as you would like.
If you think I would ask a nutter like you for something I already knew? Your opinion of yourself is way too high.
you didn't know, until I schooled you. Now you do.
Meanwhile, the constitution precludes you from implementing the restrictions you want, as you’ve been shown. You’ve been schooled on NFA items, NICS, the constitution etc. it’s gone from amusing to just sad now.
