• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Biden Keeps Lying About The US “Not Trying To Surround” China

Again, this is a lie. It's predicated on making every single detached facility a "base". Is a housing and school complex for servicemember families a "base" that threatens China? You realize most of these "bases" are smaller than a city block and contain only a bare handful of support personnel, right?

Also, what exactly makes it "terrorism" to have military bases in countries that those countries voluntarily agree to allow?

'Terrorism' is the calculated use of/threat of violence to achieve political, etc. goals. WTF DO YOU THINK IS THE REASON FOR ALL THOSE BASES ALL OVER THE PLANET?! SHEESH.

my aching christ... ugh...
 
'Terrorism' is the calculated use of/threat of violence to achieve political, etc. goals. WTF DO YOU THINK IS THE REASON FOR ALL THOSE BASES ALL OVER THE PLANET?! SHEESH.

my aching christ... ugh...
It means we're the big dog
 
I'm not terrified of debating you. I'D LOOOOOOOOOOOOOVE TO DEBATE YOU NO HOLDS BARRED. But I don't want to get thrown out for insulting you like you do to me. You're not worth it.

AND TO FURTHER ANSWER YOUR NAIVE QUESTION AGAIN: WHO KNOWS WHAT F@CKERY IS GOING ON BEHIND CLO$ED DOOR$ NOW? YOU'RE APPARATCHIK$ WILL KEEP THAT SECRET FOR DECADES!! WE DO KNOW HOW YOUR APPARATCHIK$ HAVE CONDUCTED THEMSELVES IN THE PAST BUT YOU STILL TRUST THEM. [OR AGREE WITH/DON'T CARE ABOUT WHAT THE APPARATCHIK$ HAVE DONE IN THE PAST] I DON'T TRUST THEM. PARDON ME FOR THINKING.

I'VE HEARD JOKO WAS A PAUPER WHEN HE ENTERED OFFICE AND NOW HE'S FAIRLY WEALTHY. WHERE DO YOU SUPPOSE HE GOT THE FRN$? LOL!

BTW, DID YOU TATTLE ON ME?

Translation: “I have no evidence that the President of Indonesia is a US installed puppet, but I don’t have the intellectual honesty to admit that. So I’ll mince words instead.”

****ing pathetic.

And maybe stop trolling if you don’t want to get in trouble for trolling.
 
'Terrorism' is the calculated use of/threat of violence to achieve political, etc. goals. WTF DO YOU THINK IS THE REASON FOR ALL THOSE BASES ALL OVER THE PLANET?! SHEESH.

my aching christ... ugh...

There’s a reason why “war” and “terrorism” are two separate words.

Was Russia engaging in terrorism when it sent nuclear capable bombers to Venezuela?
 
"Biden is lying. The US is deliberately surrounding China with war machinery and has been for years, and has rapidly escalated its efforts to do so during Biden’s term. There are currently no fewer than 313 US military bases in East Asia by the Pentagon’s own admission, with the Biden administration adding four new ones in the Philippines. Biden’s war machine has been busy instituting the AUKUS alliance which is specifically set up to menace China, moving nuclear-capable bombers to Indonesia, signing a military deal with Papua New Guinea, working to station missile-armed marines at Japan’s Okinawa islands, staging provocations in Taiwan, and getting into increasingly confrontational encounters with Chinese military vessels and aircraft off China’s coast as part of its dramatically increased military presence in the area.

So of course the US is trying to surround China, as evidenced by the mountains of US war machinery that are being moved into areas surrounding China. Biden can babble all he wants about wanting to secure sea lanes and protect international waters, but only a drooling idiot would believe the world’s most powerful empire is militarily surrounding its top geopolitical rival as an act of defense..."
Joined in 2014? 736 posts? Where you been boyfriend?
 
'The US' is a concept/label. Concepts/labels don't have 'interests'. Only people have interests.

ENTANGLING ALLIANCES WITH NONE.
It's a descriptive phrase, of course it's people. You didn't answer the question.
 
Do you not expect the U.S. to protect its interests around the world?

Of course! I expect the Republicrat $hit-puppet$ to meddle, steal, murder, etc. ad nau$eam, [the mo$t hideous thing$ kept $ecret] for 'Murca inc.! BUT I HATE IT!!! DON'T YOU?!
 
Of course! I expect the Republicrat $hit-puppet$ to meddle, steal, murder, etc. ad nau$eam, [the mo$t hideous thing$ kept $ecret] for 'Murca inc.! BUT I HATE IT!!! DON'T YOU?!
Send me a post card from Utopia if you ever find it.
 
Thanks for this! Unfortunately the authoritarian, imperialist, warmongering, anal sphincters who need to watch this won't.
My brother in law is one of those. I'll bet he'd watch.
 
Send me a post card from Utopia if you ever find it.

Aren't you the naive utopian? Believing your Republicrat $hit-puppets/$hit-puppetry can make the world a better/perfect place?
 
(n):poop:

HOW MANY THEN?! DO YOU OFFER ANYTHING MORE THAN REPUBLICRAT APOLOGIST BOILERPLATE?! UGH!!


"..Active duty

Most of these bases remain active today. In 2021, the US defence magazine 19FortyFive wrote that, “The U.S. Indo-Pacific Command has some 375,000 military and civilian personnel working across the Asian Pacific.”

The US maintains 56,000 active duty military personnel at more than 80 bases and other facilities across Japan, the most in any one country outside the US. About half are based in Okinawa.

Through the Cold War, the US pointed nuclear weapons at China from bases in Japan, Taiwan and South Korea.

Nuclear weapons were moved from Okinawa to the Iwakuni base near Hiroshima in 1966. When the US ambassador to Japan, Edwin O. Reischauer, learned of their presence, which was a violation of the treaty with Japan, he told the US State Department that he would resign and go public with the information if they were not removed within 90 days. The weapons were removed shortly thereafter.

Improvements in ballistic missile technology and nuclear-armed submarines mean the US no longer needs these nuclear weapons bases. Today there are still 5000 marines and two air force squadrons stationed at Iwakuni.

The US ran Okinawa via an appointed US High Commissioner until May 1972, with local people having no say, after which it was “returned” to Japan. But US troops stayed.

Power projection

Another 30,000 US personnel are based in South Korea, which the US has never left following the Korean War in the 1950s.

Camp Humphreys, southwest of Seoul in South Korea, is the largest US overseas military base in the world with more than 500 buildings. It is just 540 kilometres from the city of Dalian on the Chinese mainland, with a population of more than seven million people. That is the same distance as driving between Sydney and Wodonga on the Victorian border.

The US Army calls the base “the largest power projection platform in the Pacific”.

With the addition of the nearby Osan air base and the Kusan air base another 116 kilometres south, the US can project power both north into North Korea and west into China.

In the Philippines the US still has access to five airbases, following the closure of its large naval base at Subic Bay and the Clark air base in the early 1990s. The Financial Times reported in January that the country is planning to “allow US forces to pre-position weapons and other supplies on five more bases in addition”.

Taiwan is another key link in the chain. The US seeks to guarantee Taiwan’s de facto independence from China through arms sales and military support. A procession of US politicians including Nancy Pelosi have staged provocative visits in the last year to declare their “solidarity” with Taiwan and US President Joe Biden has repeatedly said the US would defend it against any Chinese invasion.

The US also has an agreement with Singapore that allows it to use naval and air bases there, which sit in a vital strategic chokepoint on the straits of Malacca at the entry to the South China Sea....
All at the request of the host countries, who rightfully fear China's imperialism.
 
Aren't you the naive utopian? Believing your Republicrat $hit-puppets/$hit-puppetry can make the world a better/perfect place?
I'm fine, but the country is in trouble. Liberal democrat policies have been good for me. You're the one who seems to looking for the elusive perfection. Your shit fetish is wearing thin.
 
All at the request of the host countries, who rightfully fear China's imperialism.

I'm sure corrupt $hit-puppet$ all over the planet 'reque$t thing$'. I believe ?your Republicrat $hit-puppet$ who have access to the trea$ury would be wise to deny most/all these request$. But they're obviously not very wise or honest and don't possess much common sense or decency.
 
Last edited:
I'm fine, but the country is in trouble. Liberal democrat policies have been good for me. You're the one who seems to looking for the elusive perfection. Your shit fetish is wearing thin.

Your "Liberal Democrat vs. Conservative Republican" $hit-puppet fetish has worn to zero.

But thanks for the readership.
 
Your "Liberal Democrat vs. Conservative Republican" $hit-puppet fetish has worn to zero.

But thanks for the readership.
You may be right about that, because it seems we're closer to some type of civil war since the last one. I expect it to be small, with disgruntled factions acting out, and then getting killed or jailed. If the cons get back in power, then it will deteriorate even further into something unrecognizable in this country.
 
You may be right about that, because it seems we're closer to some type of civil war since the last one. I expect it to be small, with disgruntled factions acting out, and then getting killed or jailed. If the cons get back in power, then it will deteriorate even further into something unrecognizable in this country.

People call me crazy but I'll say it again: We would have a better, more decent 'government', society, etc. if we chose names randomly 'from a phone book' [sortition] to decide who sits in public offices rather than allowing these Republicrat $hit-puppets to DOMINATE government offices.
 
People call me crazy but I'll say it again: We would have a better, more decent 'government', society, etc. if we chose names randomly 'from a phone book' [sortition] to decide who sits in public offices rather than allowing these Republicrat $hit-puppets to DOMINATE government offices.
I know George Washington was against political parties because of their vulnerability to corruption, and influence of foreign powers (both, of course, have played out somewhat). The two party system is about as stretched to the breaking point as possible, and there doesn't seem to be a kumbaya moment on the horizon.
 
Back
Top Bottom