- Joined
- Nov 7, 2019
- Messages
- 10,190
- Reaction score
- 2,141
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
I undertaand, but you are living in the old industrial 1800s with those concepts of what "full-time" is, and many companies do not follow that mentality.
No, I'm not. A full time job has a specific description for a variety of reasons.
Good point. But competition exists, and it may just come down to how much we value education, etc.....
The problem is there is no competition in public education. I think we would both agree that more motivated teachers tend to land in private schools more often than not for far less compensation and far more hours.
That measure is VERY narrow. Why not just have androids go to school to suck up info ??? There is a reason what most college PHDs can't teach secondary students well.......
Those androids are whooping our asses in basic sciences and math, vital things. I am not interested in racial and gender studies. I want kids to be good at math, science, and communicate effectively so they can be employed.
Well----we differ here. Your stance is way too narrow. It must leave room for governing. But yes, I would like to see a different statewide system (state police style)
I am not sure how you are defining governing in this situation. The teachers unions are far more of an interference to governance of public schools than anything else out there. Western states with weak education unions don't have a problem governing their school systems, they just don't spend what NY does.
We will disagree on the "part-time" thing. Many of the other things you seem mad about sound like a case of "if I don't have it, then you shouldn't either-------neener, neener"...............................Not sure what study out there shows that "results" would improve with any of the things you mention. We get top students and poor students in the same class with the same teacher, spending the same hours at the job. So how is it the teacher's fault?? Sounds like something else, and perhaps THAT might be focused on. "You can't chicken soup out of chicken doo-doo"
Look, we can disagree about a lot of things, part time isn't one of them. A public school teacher around here is 186 days a year, 10 days of sick/vacation time, with 5 active 45 minute periods per day and 1 prep period. That is 3 hours of actual instruction time per day and you can certainly get your grading/prep done in the remaining prep period. That's less than a four hour work day. I will be generous and round it to 5 hours assuming it is a miraculous teacher who tutors for an hour a day. That is less than 900 hours a year before vacation time etc. By every legal and tax definition that is a part time job. Yes, a contract can deem you full time, by their own definition but that is more about tenure and benefits than the actual definition.
My issue with benefits is that it is totally disconnected from reality. Find me a private employer that offers a pension plan. Find me a private employer that offers DROP plans, retiree healthcare programs, mandated raises for irrelevant education which is also paid for by the employer. Those things don't exist in the private sector. Moreover, they lead to major financial problems down the road. Again, I cite PSERs. These heavily unionized public employee states are going to get hit with waves of bankruptcies and failures for these pension and health plans. Even with a *soaring* stock market PSERs funding ratio is dropping like a stone. What do you think happens if the stock market goes flat/negative for three years? You get a handful of states who can't afford to send out pension checks. That's my problem. It is a corruption system. Politicians can't afford to bribe the unions with current budget years, so they give the unions future goodies they don't have to pay for. It happens over and over again.