• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Biden has no clue about the constitution like most leftist.

L

ludin

DP Veteran
Joined
Dec 3, 2013
Messages
57,470
Reaction score
14,587
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
www.foxnews.com

Biden takes heat after saying confirming Barrett would not be 'constitutional’

Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden is facing pushback to his claim that Republican efforts to confirm Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court are not “constitutional.”
www.foxnews.com www.foxnews.com

biden claims confirming barrett is not constitutional.

like most leftists he doesn't have a clue what he is talking about and this guy wants to be president.
 
No one ever said Biden was very bright about anything, let alone the Constitution.
 
ludin said:
www.foxnews.com

Biden takes heat after saying confirming Barrett would not be 'constitutional’

Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden is facing pushback to his claim that Republican efforts to confirm Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court are not “constitutional.”
www.foxnews.com www.foxnews.com

biden claims confirming barrett is not constitutional.

like most leftists he doesn't have a clue what he is talking about and this guy wants to be president.
Click to expand...

Well, republicans are hypocrites, so I'll take Biden though he errs, occasionally.

You erred, as well, because you assume all leftists are clueless about the Constitution just because Biden made an error.

In fact, most constitutional scholars are liberals. So, apparently you are clueless insofar as how to frame a proper argument.
 
ludin said:
www.foxnews.com

Biden takes heat after saying confirming Barrett would not be 'constitutional’

Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden is facing pushback to his claim that Republican efforts to confirm Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court are not “constitutional.”
www.foxnews.com www.foxnews.com

biden claims confirming barrett is not constitutional.

like most leftists he doesn't have a clue what he is talking about and this guy wants to be president.
Click to expand...
Seriously? There are 2 things Trump has never read. The Bible and the Constitution.
Biden bitching about the Supreme Court nominee is a lot better than Trump calling for arrests of all of his political foes.
But yea Biden doesn’t understand the Constitution.
 
They broke a rule, then made up a rule to scuttle Garland without doing their constitutional duty, then made up yet another rule to excuse themselves from the last one. It's not "unconstitutional" for the simple reason that it isn't explicitly prohibited to just not provide advice and consent. It's just cheating. And we all know what Biden meant. Anyone seriously believe that flub is comparable to this shit?



DAWSEY: You said yesterday when you were leaving that you were skeptical of a climate change report that the government had done. Can you just explain why you’re skeptical of that report?

TRUMP: One of the problems that a lot of people like myself — we have very high levels of intelligence, but we’re not necessarily such believers. You look at our air and our water, and it’s right now at a record clean. But when you look at China and you look at parts of Asia and when you look at South America, and when you look at many other places in this world, including Russia, including — just many other places — the air is incredibly dirty. And when you’re talking about an atmosphere, oceans are very small. And it blows over and it sails over. I mean, we take thousands of tons of garbage off our beaches all the time that comes over from Asia. It just flows right down the Pacific, it flows, and we say where does this come from. And it takes many people to start off with.



How about an infographic if those were too many words?

Trumb babble 2.png
 
OscarLevant said:
Well, republicans are hypocrites, so I'll take Biden though he errs, occasionally.

You erred, as well, because you assume all leftists are clueless about the Constitution just because Biden made an error.

In fact, most constitutional scholars are liberals. So, apparently you are clueless insofar as how to frame a proper argument.
Click to expand...

biden is 100% wrong just like you are. there is nothing unconstitutional about her confirmation.

yes you ate clueless as you cannot say what is unconstitutional about her confirmation.

liberals are not leftists. too bad there are few actual liberals left.

yes leftists are clueless.
 
US&THEM said:
Seriously? There are 2 things Trump has never read. The Bible and the Constitution.
Biden bitching about the Supreme Court nominee is a lot better than Trump calling for arrests of all of his political foes.
But yea Biden doesn’t understand the Constitution.
Click to expand...
non sequitur.

what is unconstitutional about her confirmation.
 
Biden was wrong. Nothing unconstitutional about her confirmation. "Hypocritical" is the word he should stress.
 
Holy Christ, the anti-Bidenites are such a collection of dumdums.
 
ludin said:
biden is 100% wrong just like you are. there is nothing unconstitutional about her confirmation.

yes you ate clueless as you cannot say what is unconstitutional about her confirmation.

liberals are not leftists. too bad there are few actual liberals left.

yes leftists are clueless.
Click to expand...

You imply Biden is 100% wrong. No, he is wrong about the scotus appointment being unconstitutional. 100% implies he's wrong all the time which he is not. In fact, Trump is wrong closer to 100% all the time.

But, the fact that Biden is wrong about the constitutionality of the Scotus nomination negates the more salient fact that Republicans ignored the constitution when they denied Obama the appointment of Garland, revealing their hypocrisy, under the ruse of 'advise and consent' which, denying a hearing and a vote is a total violation of the spirit of the constitution, and was done out of cowardice because to give Garland a hearing and a vote, would mean they would have to listen to Garland answer all the questions put to him before the Senate hearing, and answer them competently, and it would reaffirm the concept that he was totally qualified, which would have made it far more difficult for the senate look Garland in the eye and vote him down. But, of course, you, in your phony narrative, conveniently left out these salient aspects of the cowards that dominate republicans in the Senate.

It also proves the inescapable fact that it is not 'the left' that is clueless, it is you, for two reasons:

1. Your failure to grasp the above truth
2. Your lacking of understanding that modern liberalism is on the left.

If you are thinking 'neoliberalism' that is on the right. But, you are not making such distinctions.

"Classic Liberalism" was a reaction to tyranny of European monarchy, which is what America was founded on, giving rise to the concept of 'liberal democracy" which is neither right or left, because the concept of right or left did not exist when America, which is, or is supposed to be, a liberal democracy, the concept of right or left did not exist when America was created.

Both modern liberalism nor traditional conservatism conflict with liberal democracy, they merely choose different paths of governance, that is it. This is what you are clueless about. See, both are not in conflict with liberal democracy because as to which path of governance prevails it is chosen by the electorate.

However, Trumpism is antithetical to liberal democracy for it's creeping fascistic aspects.

Therefore, it is you, in this equation, who is 'clueless'.
 
Last edited:
US&THEM said:
Seriously? There are 2 things Trump has never read. The Bible and the Constitution.
Biden bitching about the Supreme Court nominee is a lot better than Trump calling for arrests of all of his political foes.
But yea Biden doesn’t understand the Constitution.
Click to expand...
remember when Biden was angrily against packing the court? yeah....me too.
 
Good thing Biden is not a SCOTUS nominee I suppose.
 
AlphaOmega said:
remember when Biden was angrily against packing the court? yeah....me too.
Click to expand...
Barr better arrest who Trump wants or his career and his legacy are over. Trump’s words.
 
ludin said:
www.foxnews.com

Biden takes heat after saying confirming Barrett would not be 'constitutional’

Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden is facing pushback to his claim that Republican efforts to confirm Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court are not “constitutional.”
www.foxnews.com www.foxnews.com

biden claims confirming barrett is not constitutional.

like most leftists he doesn't have a clue what he is talking about and this guy wants to be president.
Click to expand...

First of all, Biden being “clueless” on a matter has no bearing on how “clueless” others (even leftists) are on a matter.

Based on the number of 5/4 SCOTUS decisions that have been made, it would appear that even some SCOTUS justices are also “clueless“ on matters of what is (or is not) Constitutional. On that basis, I will cut Biden some slack for his opinion of what is (or is not) Constitutional.
 
Biden has gotten himself wrapped around the axel of the court packing question. He has already made the correct response for this situation but seems not to have figured out he has already made the correct response.

In fact he cannot respond otherwise and should not respond otherwise. His "its unconstitutional" comment is a direct result of this nonsense.

The question of whether Biden would support court packing if elected springs from the GOP Barrett treachery. However though it appears obvious that she will be confirmed, we don't really know what opinions she will offer until she is confronted by specific cases regardless of what the Federalist Society says and what bill of goods Donnie and the GOP sells its followers based on what comes out of the Federalist Society. Its a mutation of the Courts to be selling ideology and bias as equal partners to Judicial Temperament in SC Justices or any Judge for that matter. But that is exactly the mutation the GOP and the Federalist Society is selling. It follows nicely Newt Gingrich's mutation in the House, Mitch McConnell's subsequent mutation of the Senate and culminating with mutation of mutations, BOZO the President. BOZO and Mitch have been circle jerking themselves silly. But It does appear that dawn has finally broken over the GOP cement heads as they realize they are now holding a losing hand with BOZO and try too late to create some distance.

The court packing question to Biden a hypothetical question based on an event that has not even occurred yet, the Barrett confirmation, and without even seeing a single SC opinion she has offered. Biden can only give the GOP a weapon to wield on the one hand or an issue to get the Left of the DEM party whining on the other. Its STUPID. He should just keep giving the same answer until they are all tired of asking the question and let whomever wants to yammer on do so. Forget trying to flop hither and yon Joe because the result is dumbassery like "its unconstitutional".

We already have the Commander in Chief of Dumbassery in the WH. We don't need you following along in kind Joe.
 
AlphaOmega said:
I asked for the quote. Lefties need to stop this link hiding bullshit. Do you have the quote you stated he said or not?
Click to expand...

You don't deserve anything. Therefore, you don't get anything.

You are part of the culling.
 
Nickyjo said:
Biden was wrong. Nothing unconstitutional about her confirmation. "Hypocritical" is the word he should stress.
Click to expand...
If you think Biden should use the word 'hypocritical' with regard to the nomination, then you would have a helluva time explaining this....

 
I'd have a helluva time explaining why I would ever want some anonymous people to watch a 33 minute video to find--or not find--the hidden point of that post.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom