- Joined
- Jul 6, 2017
- Messages
- 122,485
- Reaction score
- 19,845
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
The feds can endorse and some states can outlaw it. Those are the facts
But only better if they understand the full implications of their choice, the child cannot!
You didn't address what I wrote, instead you just made a silly non-sequitur.So some medical choices are okay to be taken out of parent’s hands and others aren’t?
False equivalency. I won't even entertain it.
Ok? I AM great.Yeah but you will be ok. Lol
What?Ok? I AM great.
In many ways.
You must have noted how superior my posts are to yours, for example.
Well I'm new here. There are just certain things that are just so absurd it needs to be ignored.Lol if everyone refused to respond to a logical fallacy the site would have hardly any posts.... and, it would be a giant upgrade.
Says the person that is OK with doing permanent life altering surgery on kids.False equivalency. I won't even entertain it.
Sure....except that there isn't anything "right" with starting a 9 year old on hormone therapy of allowing a 14 year old to get an addadicktome. I mean, the government doesn't allow kids that age to drink a beer or drive a car so what is the LEAST BIT sane about allowing gender reassignment treatment for those kids?Except it doesn't, if you actually read the White House statements all it is doing is endorsing is that kids and their families work with their doctors to do what is right for them. Isn't that the medical freedom the right is always talking about?
Current protections say only 18 and older are considered for such surgery. It's not a child. You and your 18 year old's medical decisions are none of my business.Says the person that is OK with doing permanent life altering surgery on kids.
Not only is that not what is happening at all in reality if you read the other documents linked in the White House's statement that is not what is reccomended care is either for those ages either.Sure....except that there isn't anything "right" with starting a 9 year old on hormone therapy of allowing a 14 year old to get an addadicktome. I mean, the government doesn't allow kids that age to drink a beer or drive a car so what is the LEAST BIT sane about allowing gender reassignment treatment for those kids?
Romans 1: 1-32Got a verse to back that up?
This all comes back to what the child wants.The child does not make the decision.
What is your point in this post? Whats with the" ! ".
Nope.
You know what's REALLY wrong with this? This kind of thing validates the ****ed up, woke, crazy ass parents that do shit like let their baby decide what gender it is. A big part of the reason kids end up with lunatic ideas like "gender fluidity" is because their parents are blithering idiots!Not only is that not what is happening at all in reality if you read the other documents linked in the White House's statement that is not what is reccomended care is either for those ages either.
Forget to take your meds this morning grandpa?You know what's REALLY wrong with this? This kind of thing validates the ****ed up, woke, crazy ass parents that do shit like let their baby decide what gender it is. A big part of the reason kids end up with lunatic ideas like "gender fluidity" is because their parents are blithering idiots!
In a sense yes in very rare cases.So some medical choices are okay to be taken out of parent’s hands and others aren’t?
That remains to be seen.I think in the current climate if it’s something the child wants, the medical justification can be created to support it.
Nah. There just comes a point where the stupid has to stop before somebody really gets hurt and this kind of crap merely adds an exponent to stupid.Forget to take your meds this morning grandpa?
No joke, most folks have no clue what a logical fallacy even is.Well I'm new here. There are just certain things that are just so absurd it needs to be ignored.