If someone is not capable of feeding their child breakfast, they have much larger problems. Maybe even bordering on abuse.
Where is the line on what taxpayers have to support other people's children? Government schools are SUPPOSED to be for educational purposes not glorified child care centers.
Pointing out the barriers to poor kids attending charter schools that are privately operated that everybody says is open to all students. But based on your post it would appear you concur that families unable to afford the meals and the transportation and the absence of child care can’t afford to send these kids to the charter school so they must continue to send their students to the public school as it offers food and transportation and childcare. But when we pull the money out of the public school system to fund the private charter schools we are taking from the less affluent and providing for the more affluent.
But when the money is "pulled", so is the student.
the net result is kids of poor families being unable to enroll in the PUBLIC privately operated charter schools ... which receive their funding from the PUBLIC school system
what did biden promise you and your ilk, which promise(s) was not kept?
Nothing to my special interests. He did at least hint at governing as a moderate, for all Americans. That has not happened.
In what ways has he been immoderate?
What is he doing that is not moderate?
Lol
Which would be a better position if you could opt out of property taxes for schools.
You're a childless fascist who spends most of his time on DP praising Putin and the Russians. I don't think anybody cares what you have to say about educating children. We all know what kinds of things you'd like to teach them.
OK, if you want to legally establish that childless people should have no right to determine education policy I will go for that.
Nope, just people like you who want a fascist theocracy for the US and who are constantly praising dictatorships. Those people don't belong anywhere near children.