- Joined
- Oct 28, 2019
- Messages
- 54,081
- Reaction score
- 37,519
- Location
- San Antonio
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian - Left
No, they weren’t. The Hebrews absolutely were not a notable seafaring civilization.
The Hebrews are known for their sea travels.
Example:Which means it’s easy to mistranslate things in English, as happened extensively with the King James Version.
Example:
Strong's Concordance
ruach: breath, wind, spirit
Original Word: רוּחַ
Part of Speech: Noun Feminine
Transliteration: ruach
Phonetic Spelling: (roo'-akh)
Definition: breath, wind, spirit
NAS Exhaustive Concordance
Word Origin
from an unused word
Definition
breath, wind, spirit
NASB Translation
air (2), anger (1), blast (2), breath (31), breathless* (1), cool (1), courage (1), despondency* (1), exposed (1), grief* (1), heart (1), inspired (1), mind (3), motives (1), points (1), quick-tempered* (1), side (4), sides (2), Spirit (76), spirit (127), spirits (3), strength (1), temper (2), thoughts* (1), trustworthy* (1), wind (98), winds (7), windy (2), wrath (1).
My mistake. I was thinking about the Dead Sea Scrolls.No mention of spirits in Matthew. Just a very high mountaintop.
"...Again, the devil taketh him up into an exceeding high mountain, and sheweth him all the kingdoms of the world, and the glory of them;..."
My mistake. I was thinking about the Dead Sea Scrolls.
I am a Swede and you are? Illogical.
You must be a Woman to make such a illogical statement.
The people who do the translating do not always translate correctly.
For proof, why don't you go and take some pictures of ships going over the edge.And you have to admit that seeing the entire earth from a very tall mountaintop requires a flat earth.
I agree with you 100%Very true, that's why so many of those claiming to be writing God's Word in the scriptures didnt always get it right either. Sometimes they misinterpreted, sometimes they were mistaken, sometimes they changed things to fit their own agendas.
Fortunately, God's Message, overall, does shine thru in the Bible.
I am not stupid, I am aware that there are Women who are exceptional when it comes to logic.According to you, the English language defines words very narrowly. I'll accept that.
Do you accept that your statement can only be defined then, as ignorantly misogynistic? After all, it's incorrect.
Evidence: my post here is completely logical, and based on your own words.
As a matter of fact Evolution in this universe is a falsehood, so therefore God is a matter of fact.A logical British/Swedish dual national.
I am not stupid,
You should instead be aware that men and women express logic equally. Unless you'd like to source your belief?I am aware that there are Women who are exceptional when it comes to logic.
I know nothing of that study."Facts not in evidence, you Honor!"
You should instead be aware that men and women express logic equally. Unless you'd like to source your belief?
No, they weren’t. The Hebrews absolutely were not a notable seafaring civilization.
Go ahead and provide evidence to discredit evolution and prove god is a fact then!As a matter of fact Evolution in this universe is a falsehood, so therefore God is a matter of fact.
That demonstrates a profound ignorance of evolution, and probably science in general. Evolution and abiogenesis are two different things.Evolution
Evolution is Spontaneous generation or abiogenesis, how living things originally arose from non-living material. The reason Evolution is called a theory is because it is a speculation that is not evident to this day. The argument that mutations is evidence for Evolution is not valid, because there is no evidence of one species becoming another. And that is why the links are missing. It is noted that in the fossilized rock strata, that while one group of species suddenly died out, another suddenly came into existence. Bones from dinosaurs that were not identified as such were carbon dated from 12,000 years to 6,000 years. There has also been a recent discovery of live tissue, found in a dinosaur tooth that was dated to be millions of years old.
A statement like that only proves one's lack of knowledge and understanding of evolution.Artistic depictions of life forms changing over times is not scientific proof of Evolution. If evolution was true, then why are the oldest life forms still the same today?
Your statements regarding evolution indicate otherwise.I am not stupid,
For proof, provide a picture of god!For proof, why don't you go and take some pictures of ships going over the edge.
Joshua 24:3No, they weren’t. The Hebrews absolutely were not a notable seafaring civilization.
For proof, why don't you go and take some pictures of ships going over the edge.
DID KING SOLOMON’S FLEETS VISIT AMERICA? | The Ensign Message
The Official Journal of the Ensign Trust, Londonensignmessage.com
Was King Solomon the ancient world’s first shipping magnate?
Marine archaeologist unearths evidence suggesting the biblical king’s riches were based on voyages he funded with Phoenician allieswww.theguardian.com
Joshua 24:3
But I took your father Abraham from the land beyond the Euphrates and led him throughout Canaan and gave him many descendants. I gave him Isaac,
Abraham came from the area of Turkey and Sweden. Anyway, from the Germanic tribes.
My mistake. I was thinking about the Dead Sea Scrolls.
The "land beyond the Euphrates" is Mesopotamia. Abraham did NOT come from the "area of Turkey and Sweden".
Are you one of those neo-Nazis who thinks white people are the "true Israelites"?
Artistic depictions of life forms changing over times is not scientific proof of Evolution. If evolution was true, then why are the oldest life forms still the same today?
lol...they sure do...that's why so many of those claiming to be writing God's Word in the scriptures didnt always get it right either. Sometimes they misinterpreted, sometimes they were mistaken, sometimes they changed things to fit their own agendas.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?