Conservatives may well be dedicated to family and friends.
Aren't they the "family values party", after all?
It is my observation that they are not dedicated to the families of
strangers, however.
Their efforts are for themselves and their own families.
Their efforts are not for the families of strangers, or the good of society as a whole.
They donate money to charities to help strangers all over the world.
So much for your argument.
It's kind of the whole nationalism/globalism thing, on a smaller scale.
Conservatives are family-focused nationalists; liberals are society-focused globalists.
Whatever that means.
Now you're conflating the notion that the United States should be given away and raped by the world with the opposition to that evil idea.
You're not providing any useful information, merely posting double-speak to avoid the fact that conservatives donate their own money, liberal steal via taxation and give that away instead.
Conservatives are insular, liberals are inclusive.
Conservatives didn't want the US in the european war of 1914. The liberal dragged us into that war for no valid purpose, and as a result of that action the US suffered, a Great Depression and a SECOND world war. It's you people on the Left who ascribe some fraction of blame on the US for the atrocities committed by Islam. It's many on the left who argue that the US shouldn't be the police force of the world (which is correct).
And then YOU want to argue that insularity isn't a good thing?
Conservatives are narrow in their focus, liberals are broader in their focus.
There's focused, and there's fuzzy. My practice in photography says that narrow focus leads to greater depth of field, wider focus makes the close details lose importance as the individual blends into the mob.
Thanks for the imagery.
A conservative might care about his children. A liberal will care about "children" in general.
Yeah, liberals really really care about children as they insist that women continue to be allowed to murder millions of them every year before they're born.
They sure care a lot.
A conservative might care about helping his homeless brother; a liberal will care about helping the homeless in general.
But only when a Republican is president. You seen any poster-font headlines about the homeless with your Messiah as president with the Democrats in control of both Houses of Congress, when the nation's real unemployment rate is well over 10%, and climbing? They're there. There's more of them, every day. They're not being discussed by the uncaring liberals who's only real concern is the concentration of political power by chosen elites. For them, the homeless only exist when they're useful.
As soon as the Democrats lose the House this November, the media will begin to regale the nation with stories about freezing and starving "homeless" again, stories that went unnoticed last December because they simply weren't covered by the left-stream media.