- Joined
- Apr 3, 2019
- Messages
- 22,341
- Reaction score
- 9,893
- Location
- Alaska (61.5°N, -149°W)
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
Indeed, academic anarchists. It was the Libertarian Party who originally created the TEA (Taxed Enough Already) Party protests. Their very first protest was on April 15, 1977. They only protested on April 15th in the year after Democrats in Congress (and it was always the Democrats) massively increased taxes. They were a one issue party that only held a protest once or twice per decade, until Ron Paul and his fanatics took it over in 2007. Now the TEA Party is more associated with Republicans and conservatives, but only after it has been twisted beyond recognition.Exactly what I was going to post.They are like intellectual, bookish anarchists rather than Molotov cocktail throwing anarchists.
The Town That Went Feral
When a group of libertarians set about scrapping their local government, chaos descended. And then the bears moved in.newrepublic.com
There's actually a reason for society. It keeps the bears away.
The libertarian social experiment underway in Grafton was uniquely incapable of dealing with the problem [of the bears]. "Free Towners were finding that the situations that had been so easy to problem-solve in the abstract medium of message boards were difficult to resolve in person."
Hongoltz-Hetling presents, in microcosm, a case study in how a politics that fetishizes the pursuit of "freedom," both individual and economic, is in fact a recipe for impoverishment and supercharged vulnerability on both fronts at once.
I like corporations. I made a very nice career from corporations. Government and corporations were the only ones who could afford me, and I made them both pay me very well. The trick is to develop a marketable skill that is very high in demand. That puts you in the driver's seat, not the corporation or those seeking your services.Although I generally hate people who complain about "evil corporations," I do believe that most conservative libertarians are (intentionally or unintentionally) corporate shills. As government power and oversight decrease, individual power does not increase. The collective power of government is simply replaced by private forms of collective power. Without government checks, companies with lots of money can expand across multiple industries, kill competition, and effectively become governments of their own by controlling the supply to necessary goods. And it will never be as easy to take down a corporation through "market power" as it is to replace a government by going to the ballot box.
If you don't like government policy, the answer is to convince people to change it, not to structurally change government so that it has no power to do things you don't like.
Judging from the article, the residents of Grafton, New Hampshire, are complete idiots who know nothing about bears.
The residents of Grafton, New Hampshire, are idiots for allowing black bears to take over their town. It has absolutely nothing to do with their political ideology, and everything to do with their complete lack of understanding with regard to black bears.
We do not tolerate such moronic behavior in Alaska. Not only is it illegal to feed any wildlife in Alaska, if someone does so while employed they will be fired on the spot. Technically, it is even illegal to have bird-feeders in your backyard. However, I have never heard of the Alaska Department of Fish & Game prosecuting anyone for using bird-feeders.Well, yes. Who the hell feeds a bear? That's how they lose their aversion for humans.
In this case, the ideology of the town is that they cannot stop people from doing things that endanger everyone, like feeding bears.
Judging from the article, the residents of Grafton, New Hampshire, are complete idiots who know nothing about bears.
First and foremost, despite the opening explanation of the article, there are no grizzly/brown bears within 2,000 miles of New Hampshire. They are all black bears. While black bears can get as big as ~500 pounds, the vast majority weigh less than 300 pounds. Unlike grizzlies/brown bears who are very near-sighted, black bears have very good eyesight. Both types of bears are very intelligent (at least dog level intelligence), very curious, with an excellent sense of smell.
You need to be aggressive with black bears if you wish to alter their behavior. That means running towards them, shouting angrily, making yourself look as menacing as possible. That does not mean attacking, or throwing things at the bear. You should never have any kind of physical contact with any bear. It simply means to come across as aggressively as possible towards the bear. While being aggressive you also have to leave the bear a way out, otherwise it may just attack in self-defense seeing no other option.
The residents of Grafton, New Hampshire, are idiots for allowing black bears to take over their town. It has absolutely nothing to do with their political ideology, and everything to do with their complete lack of understanding with regard to black bears.
I've lived with grizzly/brown and black bears for 30 years, with hundreds of encounters, but never any problems. This past Summer was particularly interesting with regard to bears. Because the 2+ million tourists did not show up in Alaska due to COVID-19, the bears have been much bolder and more visible.
While there are certainly aggressive bears, most bears are not. Most of my grizzly/brown bear encounters have been while fishing for salmon. They wait at the edge of the forest until you catch your first salmon. They watch where you place the salmon, and when you go back to catch another they try to be sneaky and steal the salmon you just caught.
When a 10 foot long, 1,000+ pound brown bear tries to be sneaky it is difficult not to notice. All it usually takes is talking to bear to let them know they have been busted. Like a dog trying to sneak into a room they know they are not suppose to be in. At most, if they are being persistent, I might toss a ladyfinger firecracker in their general direction. They are not being aggressive, they are just looking for a free lunch. They just run off into the woods when busted.
We don't shoot our bears, unless it is absolutely necessary. We don't even close trails where bear attacks have just occurred. At best there might be a warning of an aggressive bear on the trail, but more often than not there is not even a warning.It was their political ideology which meant that there was no coherent effort to actually address the issue. From reading the article they went into a “no, you’re the statist!” death spiral real damn fast, and when hunting down and shooting some of the bears didn’t solve the problem they were paralyzed.
Oh, and at least one resident was actively feeding the bears, something which she apparently thought was none of anyone else’s business.... right up until people started getting mauled.
LOL.<snipped>
Hell, just look at the Libertarian platform. Jo J. One plank is that taxation should be voluntary because we should be free to do what we want with our money. lol.
<snipped>
LOL. Really.
We don't shoot our bears, unless it is absolutely necessary. We don't even close trails where bear attacks have just occurred. At best there might be a warning of an aggressive bear on the trail, but more often than not there is not even a warning.
We do get idiots in Alaska, as well. Like Timothy Treadwell, a tourist from San Francisco who thought he knew something about bears, until he and his girlfriend ended up being eaten by one. We also have idiots in Anchorage who like riding their mountain bikes down game trails in the forest, and then wonder why they are suddenly being mauled by a brown bear.
I am always armed for bear when I go fishing, foraging, or when walking my dogs during the Winter months. I have had more bear encounters than I can easily count in the last 30 years, but I have never felt myself threatened. I have been fortunate to not encounter aggressive bears. Alaska law requires that bears shot in self-defense have the hide, skull, paws, sex, and meat from the animal salvaged. That is an easy 4 to 6 hours worth of work, and then it all has to be hauled to the nearest Alaska Department of Fish & Game office. So the very last thing I want is to have to shoot a bear in self-defense.
My neighbors have had a couple of issues with bears, but I haven't. Primarily because they didn't secure their household trash well enough. I keep my household trash in a small shed that I wrapped with a chain-ling fence to keep out the bigger critters. I haul my trash to the landfill myself every 6 to 8 weeks. The only issues I've had with the wildlife in Alaska have been with moose, not bears. Moose are bigger than brown bears, and they fear absolutely nothing. Moose are also responsible for killing more Alaskans than bears.
Moose are easy to avoid, if you know they are there. Most deaths by moose are in the Spring and the result of someone walking in between a calf and its mother without know it. Because they are so big it is pretty easy to keep a large tree between you and the moose. Moose are obviously not predators either, so you can also run from them and not be chased. But, as I said, it does require you knowing that the moose is there.The article describes how a ”posse” formed up and shot like a dozen bears in their dens. It did nothing to deter the other bears, funnily enough.
Moose are big animals. You don’t really realize that until you see one (relatively) up close, but you probably know that already. It crazy that wolves can kill them, but I guess that’s what packs do for u
Apologies.How in the world did you attribute that post to me if I can't find my avatar anywhere in this thread?
First, I never start a sentence with the word "Hell." Second, I always type LOL in capital letters without a period. So it could not have been me.
Malfunctioning primates indeed. The bears were just being bears. Great article. Funny and sad. I'm sorry for the people who got killed because assholes took over the town. Someone should make a movie out of it.It's a function of people not understanding that it's cheaper and easier to do things as a group.
That was a town full of malfunctioning primates, and they wound up with malfunctioning bears.
I'm hoping the Trumpist party, which is what the Republican party is now, dies. I'm quite certain that the Never Trump wing has the brains and determination to become the next conservative party whether it goes by the Republican name or something else.The system mathematically guarantees that we will only ever have two parties worth mentioning.
Every time a new party becomes major, another one had to have croaked (so long, Federalists and Whigs). The GOP is croaking, and we need a conservative party. It's either you or the "constitutionalist" party which more or less wants women in burkas.
I'd prefer the libertarian party, so it would be nice if they would get serious in the midterms instead of the doomed gesture every 4 years.
Partial libertarians are fine. They want the government off their ass on stuff like drugs, sex, and who you can marry. Me too. But the Big-L ones are virtually indistinguishable from anarchists or communists, the other two 'systems' that propose no government.
Partial libertarians are fine. They want the government off their ass on stuff like drugs, sex, and who you can marry. Me too. But the Big-L ones are virtually indistinguishable from anarchists or communists, the other two 'systems' that propose no government.
I had a brief flirtation with the LP. I even visited their presidential convention, as a friend of mine was a delegate and I happened to be in Chicago that weekend. Wow, what a bunch of idiots. Nothing ever gets done because every person in the party refuses to stick together with others on policy because they are all super macho individuals who refuse to ever compromise. 50 years of wank from the party, they have never elected anyone to any position of actual power, but they brag about winning uncontested races for county water boards....
Oh, man. This is hillarious.The Town That Went Feral
When a group of libertarians set about scrapping their local government, chaos descended. And then the bears moved in.newrepublic.com
There's actually a reason for society. It keeps the bears away.
Wait, what exactly are you saying about my card table blanket fort?Libertarians think they can create their utopia. About all they can do is put blankets over card tables and pretend they have a fort.
The system mathematically guarantees that we will only ever have two parties worth mentioning.
Perot did not alter the election 1992 or 1996 elections, any more than Trump altered the 2000 election when he ran as the Reform Party candidate for President. Perot did not receive a single Electoral College vote from any State in either election. Therefore, he had no effect on the outcome of either election.Perot altered an election and almost got a viable third party started.
Perot did not alter the election 1992 or 1996 elections, any more than Trump altered the 2000 election when he ran as the Reform Party candidate for President. Perot did not receive a single Electoral College vote from any State in either election. Therefore, he had no effect on the outcome of either election.
As has been repeatedly demonstrated, the popular vote in presidential elections doesn't mean diddly-squat. Only the Electoral College counts in presidential elections and Perot got zero EC votes. There was not a single State where Perot held the majority of the popular vote. If he had, then he would have received at the very minimum one EC vote if it were Maine or Nebraska, or a minimum of three EC votes if it was any other State or DC. Which means that Perot lost in every State, and DC.You're sure the outcome would have been the same without Perot in the race, particularly in 1992 with 19% of the vote?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?